Revision summary
Caste has changed through Sanskritization, land, city work, and elections. Ritual service and occupation rules have weakened in many public settings. Endogamy, honour, and atrocity show that the system has not disintegrated. Politicisation of caste is mobilisation, not disappearance. Treat change and weakening as real, disintegration as a false comfort.
Model answer
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CH[Sanskritization vote job] --> W[Weaker ritual service] EN[Endogamy atrocity] --> ST[System continues] DC[Dominant caste] --> CH
Conclusion
- Dipankar Gupta’s distinction of discrete communities competing is useful. Competition is not disintegration.
Caste is changing in work and politics and weakening as a total village ritual order. It is not disintegrating while endogamy and graded inequality organise life chances.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Give some of the important studies relating to the structural changes in the Indian family system.
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Does urbanisation end caste?
It weakens some village rules. Housing, marriage, and networks often recode caste in the city.
-
Is reservation proof that caste is stronger?
It is proof that inequality was recognised. It also organises caste as a political identity.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give a critical analysis of Andre Beteille's study of Tanjore village. -
2018 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Has caste system hindered democracy and adult franchise in India. Discuss. -
2017 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How have the struggles against untouchability changed their forms and perspective from Gandhian to Ambedkarite positions? -
2017 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the changes in the cultural and structural aspects of the caste system since independence? -
2016 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
How has B.R. Ambedkar identified the features of caste system ? How is it different from the mainstream treatment of caste features ? -
2016 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss Andre Beteille account of the relationship between caste, class and power as a change from symmetrical to asymmetrical one. -
2015 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system -
2015 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How far Srinivas Sanskritization is modernizing force or traditionalizing force in understanding the changes in caste system?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Elwin defined tribal freedom as protection of land, language, and self-rule. He rejected Ghurye’s assimilation of tribe into Hindu society. Isolation was a shield, not a museum, until contact was fair. Nehruvian Panchsheel borrowed this caution. Law now tries to keep that freedom as rights inside the state.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Phule linked caste domination to the robbery of the peasant. Gulamgiri and the cultivator’s whip made tillers the centre of critique. Satyashodhak schools attacked the knowledge monopoly that kept the field unfree. He is closer to anti-caste agrarian politics than to mild temple reform. Class language came later; the landlord-priest pair was already his target.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system
Caste System
Dumont treats caste as a hierarchical ideology of purity and impurity. Power and wealth are real but encompassed by ritual rank. Homo hierarchicus contrasts with Western equality as a value. Sripuram and Rampura show class and dominant caste that the ideology does not fix. The perspective is necessary for values, insufficient for land and politics.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.