Revision summary
Dumont treats caste as a hierarchical ideology of purity and impurity. Power and wealth are real but encompassed by ritual rank. Homo hierarchicus contrasts with Western equality as a value. Sripuram and Rampura show class and dominant caste that the ideology does not fix. The perspective is necessary for values, insufficient for land and politics.
Model answer
Introduction
Louis Dumont read caste as a whole ideology of hierarchy, not as a list of customs. Homo Hierarchicus places purity and impurity above power and wealth as the principle of the system.
Body
Core of the perspective
- The encompassing Brahmanical value of purity ranks groups; the king and the merchant are powerful yet encompassed.
- Homo hierarchicus is the Indian person of ranked relations, against the Western homo aequalis of the individual.
- Separation, hierarchy, and interdependence (jajmani-type service) are expressions of one ideology.
What it explains
- Why rank can survive without matching land, which Srinivas’s dominant caste then has to explain as a field correction.
- Why endogamy and commensality feel moral, not only economic.
Critiques
- Andre Beteille’s Sripuram showed caste, class, and power coming apart; disharmony, not one sacred whole.
- M. N. Srinivas’s field view and Dalit-Bahujan writing deny that purity is the lived centre for those who face atrocity.
- A. R. Desai put production and class first.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Dumont] --> PU[Purity impurity] PU --> H[Hierarchy encompasses power] F[Srinivas Beteille] --> FV[Field class power]
Conclusion
Dumont’s caste is an ideology of purity that encompasses power. It is a strong book-view. Indian field studies keep it as one language of rank, not as the whole of the system.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How far Gandhiji was trusted by the untouchables
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Does Dumont deny change?
He saw modern equality as a rival value. He still theorised traditional India as hierarchical holism.
-
Is jajmani Dumont’s proof?
Interdependence fits his whole. Later work showed jajmani as uneven and often exploitative.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give a critical analysis of Andre Beteille's study of Tanjore village. -
2018 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Has caste system hindered democracy and adult franchise in India. Discuss. -
2017 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How have the struggles against untouchability changed their forms and perspective from Gandhian to Ambedkarite positions? -
2017 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the changes in the cultural and structural aspects of the caste system since independence? -
2016 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
How has B.R. Ambedkar identified the features of caste system ? How is it different from the mainstream treatment of caste features ? -
2016 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss Andre Beteille account of the relationship between caste, class and power as a change from symmetrical to asymmetrical one. -
2015 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Is caste system changing, weakening or disintegrating in India? -
2015 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How far Srinivas Sanskritization is modernizing force or traditionalizing force in understanding the changes in caste system?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Elwin defined tribal freedom as protection of land, language, and self-rule. He rejected Ghurye’s assimilation of tribe into Hindu society. Isolation was a shield, not a museum, until contact was fair. Nehruvian Panchsheel borrowed this caution. Law now tries to keep that freedom as rights inside the state.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Phule linked caste domination to the robbery of the peasant. Gulamgiri and the cultivator’s whip made tillers the centre of critique. Satyashodhak schools attacked the knowledge monopoly that kept the field unfree. He is closer to anti-caste agrarian politics than to mild temple reform. Class language came later; the landlord-priest pair was already his target.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How far Gandhiji was trusted by the untouchables
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Gandhi’s anti-untouchability work created moral trust among many Harijans. Ambedkar rejected Gandhi’s varna frame and Congress tutelage. The Poona Pact is the hinge of political mistrust. Temple entry without structural power did not satisfy Dalit radicals. Trust was partial, moral more than constitutional.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.