Revision summary
Elwin defined tribal freedom as protection of land, language, and self-rule. He rejected Ghurye’s assimilation of tribe into Hindu society. Isolation was a shield, not a museum, until contact was fair. Nehruvian Panchsheel borrowed this caution. Law now tries to keep that freedom as rights inside the state.
Model answer
Introduction
Verrier Elwin treated tribal freedom as the right to keep land, language, and council, not as a gift of sudden assimilation. Isolation for him was a shield until Adivasis could meet the plains on fair terms.
Body
Freedom as protection
- Elwin argued that colonial and Hindu plains pressure stole forest, liquor custom, and self-rule. Freedom meant a National Park style of protection, later softened into a slower joining.
- He opposed G. S. Ghurye’s view of tribes as backward Hindus. For Elwin, Hinduisation was often loss, not uplift.
- Nehru’s tribal Panchsheel later echoed this: develop without imposing, and leave land and dance intact.
What freedom was not
- It was not museum freeze. Elwin wanted medicine and schools that did not erase the village.
- It was not missionary or contractor freedom to enter as they pleased.
Limit
- Critics said isolation could stall citizenship and reservation. Integration through Schedules, PESA, and the Forest Rights Act tries to keep Elwin’s land-freedom inside the republic.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD E[Elwin] --> P[Protect land language council] G[Ghurye] --> H[Hinduisation] P --> I[Panchsheel FRA PESA]
Conclusion
Elwin’s tribal freedom is autonomy of habitat and custom against assimilation. The useful remainder is rights-based integration, not Ghurye’s Hinduisation as destiny.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Did Elwin want tribes cut off forever?
No. He wanted delayed, fair contact so land and custom were not the first things taken.
-
Is his view anti-development?
He opposed mines-and-missions development. He accepted schools and health that left self-rule standing.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2015 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical -
2015 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How far Gandhiji was trusted by the untouchables -
2015 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Feminization of poverty. -
2015 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss Marxist approach to the analysis of Indian nationalism. -
2015 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the basic tenets of Hindu religion? Is Hinduism based on monotheism or polytheism? -
2015 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Why is it necessary to implement PCPNDT Act in India? -
2015 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Main objective of Tribal sub plan (TSP) -
2015 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss B.R. Ambedkar as a wise democrat.
More from this paper
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Phule linked caste domination to the robbery of the peasant. Gulamgiri and the cultivator’s whip made tillers the centre of critique. Satyashodhak schools attacked the knowledge monopoly that kept the field unfree. He is closer to anti-caste agrarian politics than to mild temple reform. Class language came later; the landlord-priest pair was already his target.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system
Caste System
Dumont treats caste as a hierarchical ideology of purity and impurity. Power and wealth are real but encompassed by ritual rank. Homo hierarchicus contrasts with Western equality as a value. Sripuram and Rampura show class and dominant caste that the ideology does not fix. The perspective is necessary for values, insufficient for land and politics.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How far Gandhiji was trusted by the untouchables
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Gandhi’s anti-untouchability work created moral trust among many Harijans. Ambedkar rejected Gandhi’s varna frame and Congress tutelage. The Poona Pact is the hinge of political mistrust. Temple entry without structural power did not satisfy Dalit radicals. Trust was partial, moral more than constitutional.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.