Q2(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks · 1 min read

← Q2(c) Q2(b) →

How has B.R. Ambedkar identified the features of caste system ? How is it different from the mainstream treatment of caste features ?

Topic: Caste System. Syllabus: Caste System: Perspectives (G.S. Ghurye, M.N. Srinivas, Louis Dumont, Andre Beteille); Features of caste system; Untouchability — forms and perspectives. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Caste System.

Revision summary

Ambedkar stressed graded inequality, endogamy, and division of labourers. Untouchability is structural contempt, not a side custom. Ghurye catalogued traits; Dumont theorised purity. Sanskritization keeps the system; Ambedkar seeks exit. The difference is indictment plus a political programme.

Model answer

Introduction

Ambedkar identified caste as a system of graded inequality, endogamy, and occupational closure that is a social order of contempt, not a harmony of functions. Mainstream catalogues listed traits; he named the mechanism and the wound.

Body

Ambedkar’s features

  • Caste is not a division of labour only. It is a division of labourers, ranked and hereditary.
  • Endogamy is the key that reproduces the system; sati, child marriage, and bans on widow remarriage police it.
  • Graded inequality sets every rung against the one below, which blocks a simple class bloc of the oppressed.
  • Untouchability is the extreme of contempt, not a small ritual extra.

Mainstream contrast

  • G. S. Ghurye listed segmentation, hierarchy, commensality, disability, and occupation. The list is useful; it can sound like a civilisational inventory.
  • Dumont placed purity ideology at the centre and encompassed power. Ambedkar placed humiliation and closed doors at the centre.
  • Srinivas’s Sanskritization is mobility inside the ladder. Ambedkar wanted the ladder broken.

Difference that matters

  • Mainstream often explains caste. Ambedkar indicts it and designs annihilation through law, conversion, and representation.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  AM[Ambedkar] --> GI[Graded inequality endogamy]
  GH[Ghurye list] --> FT[Features inventory]
  DU[Dumont] --> PU[Purity ideology]
  GI --> AN[Annihilation]

Conclusion

Ambedkar’s caste is graded, endogamous, and anti-democratic. Mainstream feature-lists describe the shell. He described the engine and demanded its destruction.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2018 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Give a critical analysis of Andre Beteille's study of Tanjore village.

    View answer →

  2. 2018 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Has caste system hindered democracy and adult franchise in India. Discuss.

    View answer →

  3. 2017 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    How have the struggles against untouchability changed their forms and perspective from Gandhian to Ambedkarite positions?

    View answer →

  4. 2017 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    What are the changes in the cultural and structural aspects of the caste system since independence?

    View answer →

  5. 2016 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Discuss Andre Beteille account of the relationship between caste, class and power as a change from symmetrical to asymmetrical one.

    View answer →

  6. 2015 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Is caste system changing, weakening or disintegrating in India?

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    How far Srinivas Sanskritization is modernizing force or traditionalizing force in understanding the changes in caste system?

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q4(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

What are the different forms of untouchability still practised in India? Discuss with suitable illustrations

Caste System

Untouchability is practised exclusion on grounds of hereditary pollution, abolished in Article 17 but not in social geography. Forms include water, food, temple, housing, school and marriage bans. Manual scavenging continues despite the 2013 Act. Urban cups, sewers and housing filters are contemporary illustrations. Guru’s humiliation and Ambedkar’s annihilation agenda still describe the structure.

Q2(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

What, according to Andre Beteille, are the bases of agrarian class structure in India? Analyse

Caste System

Béteille based agrarian class on land property and labour, not on caste rank. Owners, tenants and agricultural labourers are the main classes in his Tanjore study. Caste, class and power are three interacting dimensions. Ownership, control and labour remain the operational bases. Corporate farming, reverse tenancy and public works modify the actors without cancelling the scheme.

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

What, according to you, are the factors responsible for the continuance of caste system in India? Explain.

Caste System

Caste continues as organisation and ideology, not only as village custom. Ambedkar’s endogamy, Dumont’s hierarchy, and Ghurye’s features still describe marriage, food and stigma. Srinivas showed mobility inside caste; Béteille and Desai linked it to land, class and power. The Constitution and reservations recast caste as a political identity rather than simply erasing it. Markets and cities loosened occupation more than they loosened kinship.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.