Q1(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q3(c) Q7(a) →

Give a critical analysis of Andre Beteille's study of Tanjore village.

Topic: Caste System. Syllabus: Caste System: Perspectives (G.S. Ghurye, M.N. Srinivas, Louis Dumont, Andre Beteille); Features of caste system; Untouchability — forms and perspectives. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2018 and Caste System.

Revision summary

Sripuram split caste, class, and power in a Tanjore village. Land reform and democracy made the structure disharmonic. The study corrected harmony functionalism and a fused sacred hierarchy. Limits are Brahmin-centred fieldwork, thin gender, and one-village scale. Use it as a method, not as all of India.

Model answer

Introduction

Andre Beteille’s Sripuram study in Tanjore treated one village as a laboratory of caste, class, and power. The analysis is strong because it broke the single sacred hierarchy. It is limited because one agraharam-centred village cannot be India.

Body

What Sripuram showed

  • Brahmins, dominant peasants, and Adi-Dravida labour did not form one functional whole in M. N. Srinivas’s harmony sense.
  • Land reform and the vote shifted class and power even when caste identity remained.
  • Harmonic hierarchy, where inequality is morally accepted, gave way to a disharmonic structure: equality as public value, rank as practice.

Strengths

  • It separated three dimensions that Ghurye’s civilisational caste and Dumont’s purity often fused.
  • It kept fieldwork without pretending the village was a closed republic.

Critiques

  • The agraharam lens can over-centre Brahmins and under-see women’s kinship, which Leela Dube later insisted on.
  • A. R. Desai would still want a fuller colonial class history than one Tanjore snapshot.
  • Generalising Tamil wet-rice agrarian change to dry or tribal India is unsafe.
  • Power outside the village—parties, mills, the state—appears, but the monograph still pulls the eye inward.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  SR[Sripuram Tanjore] --> CC[Caste]
  SR --> CL[Class]
  SR --> PW[Power]
  DH[Disharmonic equality] --> SR
  LM[Scale gender] --> CR[Critique]

Conclusion

  • Beteille’s Tanjore village is a critical classic: caste is not class is not power, and modern India is disharmonic. The critique is scale, gender thinness, and the temptation to let Sripuram stand for the nation.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Has caste system hindered democracy and adult franchise in India. Discuss.

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2018 · Q7(a)). View answer →

  • Did Beteille deny Dumont?

    He denied that purity ideology is the only ranking principle on the ground.

  • Is Sripuram a dominant-caste village like Rampura?

    It is a different agrarian mix. The lesson is analytical split, not a copy of Srinivas’s Mysore.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2020 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    How does Andre Beteille justify 'middle class in India?

    View answer →

  2. 2018 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Has caste system hindered democracy and adult franchise in India. Discuss.

    View answer →

  3. 2017 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    How have the struggles against untouchability changed their forms and perspective from Gandhian to Ambedkarite positions?

    View answer →

  4. 2017 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    What are the changes in the cultural and structural aspects of the caste system since independence?

    View answer →

  5. 2016 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    How has B.R. Ambedkar identified the features of caste system ? How is it different from the mainstream treatment of caste features ?

    View answer →

  6. 2016 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Discuss Andre Beteille account of the relationship between caste, class and power as a change from symmetrical to asymmetrical one.

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Is caste system changing, weakening or disintegrating in India?

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q4(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

What are the different forms of untouchability still practised in India? Discuss with suitable illustrations

Caste System

Untouchability is practised exclusion on grounds of hereditary pollution, abolished in Article 17 but not in social geography. Forms include water, food, temple, housing, school and marriage bans. Manual scavenging continues despite the 2013 Act. Urban cups, sewers and housing filters are contemporary illustrations. Guru’s humiliation and Ambedkar’s annihilation agenda still describe the structure.

Q2(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

What, according to Andre Beteille, are the bases of agrarian class structure in India? Analyse

Caste System

Béteille based agrarian class on land property and labour, not on caste rank. Owners, tenants and agricultural labourers are the main classes in his Tanjore study. Caste, class and power are three interacting dimensions. Ownership, control and labour remain the operational bases. Corporate farming, reverse tenancy and public works modify the actors without cancelling the scheme.

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

What, according to you, are the factors responsible for the continuance of caste system in India? Explain.

Caste System

Caste continues as organisation and ideology, not only as village custom. Ambedkar’s endogamy, Dumont’s hierarchy, and Ghurye’s features still describe marriage, food and stigma. Srinivas showed mobility inside caste; Béteille and Desai linked it to land, class and power. The Constitution and reservations recast caste as a political identity rather than simply erasing it. Markets and cities loosened occupation more than they loosened kinship.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.