Revision summary
Dumont treats caste as a hierarchical ideology of purity and impurity. Power and wealth are real but encompassed by ritual rank. Homo hierarchicus contrasts with Western equality as a value. Sripuram and Rampura show class and dominant caste that the ideology does not fix. The perspective is necessary for values, insufficient for land and politics.
Model answer
Introduction
Louis Dumont read caste as a whole ideology of hierarchy, not as a list of customs. Homo Hierarchicus places purity and impurity above power and wealth as the principle of the system.
Body
Core of the perspective
- The encompassing Brahmanical value of purity ranks groups; the king and the merchant are powerful yet encompassed.
- Homo hierarchicus is the Indian person of ranked relations, against the Western homo aequalis of the individual.
- Separation, hierarchy, and interdependence (jajmani-type service) are expressions of one ideology.
What it explains
- Why rank can survive without matching land, which Srinivas’s dominant caste then has to explain as a field correction.
- Why endogamy and commensality feel moral, not only economic.
Critiques
- Andre Beteille’s Sripuram showed caste, class, and power coming apart; disharmony, not one sacred whole.
- M. N. Srinivas’s field view and Dalit-Bahujan writing deny that purity is the lived centre for those who face atrocity.
- A. R. Desai put production and class first.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Dumont] --> PU[Purity impurity] PU --> H[Hierarchy encompasses power] F[Srinivas Beteille] --> FV[Field class power]
Conclusion
Dumont’s caste is an ideology of purity that encompasses power. It is a strong book-view. Indian field studies keep it as one language of rank, not as the whole of the system.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Is caste system changing, weakening or disintegrating in India?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q2(a)). View answer →
-
Does Dumont deny change?
He saw modern equality as a rival value. He still theorised traditional India as hierarchical holism.
-
Is jajmani Dumont’s proof?
Interdependence fits his whole. Later work showed jajmani as uneven and often exploitative.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give a critical analysis of Andre Beteille's study of Tanjore village. -
2018 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Has caste system hindered democracy and adult franchise in India. Discuss. -
2017 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How have the struggles against untouchability changed their forms and perspective from Gandhian to Ambedkarite positions? -
2017 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the changes in the cultural and structural aspects of the caste system since independence? -
2016 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
How has B.R. Ambedkar identified the features of caste system ? How is it different from the mainstream treatment of caste features ? -
2016 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss Andre Beteille account of the relationship between caste, class and power as a change from symmetrical to asymmetrical one. -
2015 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Is caste system changing, weakening or disintegrating in India? -
2015 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How far Srinivas Sanskritization is modernizing force or traditionalizing force in understanding the changes in caste system?
More from this topic
Q4(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the different forms of untouchability still practised in India? Discuss with suitable illustrations
Caste System
Untouchability is practised exclusion on grounds of hereditary pollution, abolished in Article 17 but not in social geography. Forms include water, food, temple, housing, school and marriage bans. Manual scavenging continues despite the 2013 Act. Urban cups, sewers and housing filters are contemporary illustrations. Guru’s humiliation and Ambedkar’s annihilation agenda still describe the structure.
Q2(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What, according to Andre Beteille, are the bases of agrarian class structure in India? Analyse
Caste System
Béteille based agrarian class on land property and labour, not on caste rank. Owners, tenants and agricultural labourers are the main classes in his Tanjore study. Caste, class and power are three interacting dimensions. Ownership, control and labour remain the operational bases. Corporate farming, reverse tenancy and public works modify the actors without cancelling the scheme.
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What, according to you, are the factors responsible for the continuance of caste system in India? Explain.
Caste System
Caste continues as organisation and ideology, not only as village custom. Ambedkar’s endogamy, Dumont’s hierarchy, and Ghurye’s features still describe marriage, food and stigma. Srinivas showed mobility inside caste; Béteille and Desai linked it to land, class and power. The Constitution and reservations recast caste as a political identity rather than simply erasing it. Markets and cities loosened occupation more than they loosened kinship.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.