Revision summary
Desai and Shah split household residence from the wider family. Karve showed regional kinship systems, not one joint-family India. Rampura, Sripuram, and Kolenda document fission without the end of kinship. Urban studies find nuclear homes with extended obligations. Gender ideology often outlasts the joint roof.
Model answer
Introduction
Indian family change is not a simple joint-to-nuclear story. Important studies show household form shifting with land, migration, and law, while kinship ideology often stays patrilineal.
Body
Village and Indological baselines
- I. P. Desai distinguished household from family and warned that co-residence is not the whole joint family.
- Irawati Karve mapped regional kinship: north, south, east, and the Himalayan belt, so structure is not one Hindu joint family.
- A. M. Shah treated the household as the observable unit and the family as a wider kin process.
Change on the ground
- Srinivas’s Rampura and Beteille’s Sripuram linked land reform and education to fission of joint living among the propertied.
- Pauline Kolenda reviewed Indian joint family studies and found regional and caste variation, not linear Westernisation.
- Leela Dube showed that Seed and Earth keeps gender structure even when the roof splits.
Urban and policy studies
- M. S. Gore and later urban family work showed nuclear living with strong extra-household kin, a modified extended family.
- Census and NFHS track smaller households, delayed marriage, and elderly living, which Yogendra Singh would read as modernization of tradition, not replacement.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Desai Shah household versus family] --> CH[Fission migration] K[Karve regions] --> CH DU[Dube gender] --> ST[Patriliny persists]
Conclusion
- The important studies agree: households are smaller and more mobile, yet lineage, dowry, and care still organise the Indian family. Structure changed; the kin map did not vanish.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Broadly compare the kinship system of North and South India.
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Did the joint family die?
Co-residence declined in many classes. Joint property, ritual, and care often continue.
-
Is the nuclear family Westernisation?
Often it is a residential adaptation to jobs and housing, still tied to natal and affinal kin.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain how land reforms brought about desired agrarian transformation. -
2022 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the challenges during village studies in India. -
2021 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Caste system studies in India have been dominated by the "book-view" initially, How did the entry of "field-view" bring about a balance in the study of Indian caste system? Discuss -
2019 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Examine the changing initiatives of the land tenure system in India -
2019 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Define patriarchy. Does it have bearings on women's entitlement in Indian family system ? Explain -
2017 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Compare the north Indian kinship System with the South Indian kinship system -
2016 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Significance of Village Studies in Indian Sociology -
2016 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Analyse the major components of Land Reform Acts. Show their effectiveness in curbing rural inequality.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Elwin defined tribal freedom as protection of land, language, and self-rule. He rejected Ghurye’s assimilation of tribe into Hindu society. Isolation was a shield, not a museum, until contact was fair. Nehruvian Panchsheel borrowed this caution. Law now tries to keep that freedom as rights inside the state.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Phule linked caste domination to the robbery of the peasant. Gulamgiri and the cultivator’s whip made tillers the centre of critique. Satyashodhak schools attacked the knowledge monopoly that kept the field unfree. He is closer to anti-caste agrarian politics than to mild temple reform. Class language came later; the landlord-priest pair was already his target.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system
Caste System
Dumont treats caste as a hierarchical ideology of purity and impurity. Power and wealth are real but encompassed by ritual rank. Homo hierarchicus contrasts with Western equality as a value. Sripuram and Rampura show class and dominant caste that the ideology does not fix. The perspective is necessary for values, insufficient for land and politics.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.