Revision summary
Human development ranks education and health as ends, growth as means. Sen and Haq made this the policy language of capabilities. Liberalisation delivered growth and a private social market. The poor still face weak public school and clinic systems. India’s post-1991 record supports HD caution, not growth-alone.
Model answer
Introduction
The human development approach, after Mahbub ul Haq and Amartya Sen, treats education and health as freedoms that growth may miss. Post-liberalised India grew fast in GDP and unevenly in those freedoms.
Body
The claim
- Income is a means. Literacy, longevity, and dignity are the ends. Kerala’s earlier path was the Indian exhibit.
- Growth without capability leaves informal workers, Adivasis, and women as Sen’s unfreedoms.
Post-1991 India
- Liberalisation expanded private hospitals and schools. This raised options for the middle class and raised exclusion for those without cash, a Beteille disharmony in social policy.
- Public health and government school quality often lagged even as software and malls grew.
- Nutrition, anaemia, and learning outcomes showed that growth was not automatically human development.
Balance
- Growth can fund teachers and clinics. The approach says sequence and public provision matter more than trickle.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD GDP[Post-1991 growth] --> MC[Private school hospital] HD[Education health capability] --> F[Freedom] GDP -.->|uneven| HD
Conclusion
- Post-liberal India confirms the HD claim: growth is not enough when education and health remain class goods. The republic still needs public capability, not only a larger GDP.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Write a brief note on the Freedom of the Press.
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Does HD reject growth?
No. It rejects growth as a sufficient substitute for public education and health.
-
Is private schooling HD?
It can raise some scores. As a system it can deepen inequality of capability.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2015 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals -
2015 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical -
2015 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How far Gandhiji was trusted by the untouchables -
2015 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Feminization of poverty. -
2015 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss Marxist approach to the analysis of Indian nationalism. -
2015 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the basic tenets of Hindu religion? Is Hinduism based on monotheism or polytheism? -
2015 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Why is it necessary to implement PCPNDT Act in India? -
2015 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Main objective of Tribal sub plan (TSP)
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Elwin defined tribal freedom as protection of land, language, and self-rule. He rejected Ghurye’s assimilation of tribe into Hindu society. Isolation was a shield, not a museum, until contact was fair. Nehruvian Panchsheel borrowed this caution. Law now tries to keep that freedom as rights inside the state.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Phule linked caste domination to the robbery of the peasant. Gulamgiri and the cultivator’s whip made tillers the centre of critique. Satyashodhak schools attacked the knowledge monopoly that kept the field unfree. He is closer to anti-caste agrarian politics than to mild temple reform. Class language came later; the landlord-priest pair was already his target.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system
Caste System
Dumont treats caste as a hierarchical ideology of purity and impurity. Power and wealth are real but encompassed by ritual rank. Homo hierarchicus contrasts with Western equality as a value. Sripuram and Rampura show class and dominant caste that the ideology does not fix. The perspective is necessary for values, insufficient for land and politics.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.