Q4(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks · 1 min read

← Q1(e) Q4(b) →

Discuss Marxist approach to the analysis of Indian nationalism.

Topic: Perspectives on the study of Indian society. Syllabus: Perspectives on the study of Indian society: Indology (G.S. Ghurye); Structural functionalism (M.N. Srinivas); Marxist sociology (A.R. Desai). Same official PYQ from year-wise 2015 and Perspectives on the study of Indian society.

Revision summary

Desai treated nationalism as a product of colonial economic change. The national movement expressed bourgeois aims while mobilising other classes. The approach explains material stakes better than spiritual histories. Ambedkar and subaltern work show caste and the peasant as more than a class shadow. Communalism remains a limit of a class-only nation story.

Model answer

Introduction

The Marxist approach reads Indian nationalism as a class project inside colonial capitalism, not as a spiritual awakening. A. R. Desai’s Social Background of Indian Nationalism is the classic statement.

Body

Desai’s core

  • British rule created railways, a bourgeoisie, a working class, and a new intelligentsia. Nationalism grew from these material relations.
  • The Congress-led movement expressed bourgeois needs for a national market and office, while drawing peasant and worker energy.
  • Caste and religion are real, but class and colonial economy are the motor.

What it captures

  • Why landlords, mill owners, and professionals sat inside the same flag with different stakes.
  • Why agrarian radicals such as Phule and later peasant struggles sit uneasily with a purely cultural nation.

Limits

  • Ambedkar showed that the nation could ignore graded inequality. Culture is not only superstructure.
  • Subaltern studies charged that Desai still centred elite politics.
  • Partition and communalism need more than a class remainder.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  C[Colonial capitalism] --> B[Bourgeois nationalism]
  B --> CN[Congress nation]
  P[Peasant worker] --> CN
  CA[Caste communal] --> CR[Critique of class-only]

Conclusion

Marxist analysis of Indian nationalism is strongest on colonial capitalism and bourgeois leadership. It must be completed by caste, gender, and communal fracture, or the nation looks too much like a class unfolding.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2015 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals

    View answer →

  2. 2015 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical

    View answer →

  3. 2015 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    How far Gandhiji was trusted by the untouchables

    View answer →

  4. 2015 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Feminization of poverty.

    View answer →

  5. 2015 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    What are the basic tenets of Hindu religion? Is Hinduism based on monotheism or polytheism?

    View answer →

  6. 2015 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Why is it necessary to implement PCPNDT Act in India?

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Main objective of Tribal sub plan (TSP)

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Discuss B.R. Ambedkar as a wise democrat.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

"Educational development is the only Panacea for country's all ills and evils." Critically examine the above statement with reference to NEP-2020

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Education is necessary for mobility and anti-caste citizenship but not a solo panacea. NEP 2020 reforms structure, language, vocation and equity on paper. Without teachers, public finance and jobs, it becomes credentialism and a dual private-public system. Caste, land and informal labour reproduce ills that schooling alone cannot dissolve. Phule–Ambedkar were right to start with the school and wrong if we stop there.

Q7(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

What are the Private and Public network and support systems operative in Indian society for the aged? Suggest measures to curb down the challenges before care givers of the aged

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Private support for the aged is still mainly kin, plus a small paid-care market. Public support is pensions, NPHCE and the 2007 Maintenance Act, all thin relative to need. Nuclear residence and migration weaken the joint-family guarantee without ending dependence. Caregivers, mostly women, face time poverty and little respite. Measures must combine adequate pensions, home services and gender-equal family law.

Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Bring out various factors responsible for declining of village Industries in India.

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Village industries declined through colonial competition, forest enclosure and the collapse of patronage. Post-independence mill goods, power-looms and plastics continued the squeeze. Credit, GST, and migration now pull youth out of hereditary crafts. Some clusters brand and survive; most artisan households enter informal labour. The process reorders caste occupations, not only GDP shares.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.