Revision summary
Hind Swaraj treats modern civilisation as a moral disease. Swaraj begins as ascetic self-mastery and village duty. Satyagraha is the form of action the text commends. Khadi and national education are practical corollaries. Caste and class critiques mark the book’s democratic limit.
Model answer
Introduction
Hind Swaraj (1909) shows Gandhi as a moralist of civilisation, an ascetic of self-rule, and a man of action who wanted a different swaraj, not a brown copy of the British state.
Body
Moralist
- He judged modern civilisation as disease: railways, lawyers, and mills that empty swaraj of the soul.
- True swaraj is rule over the self and the village, not parliamentary mimicry. A. R. Desai would call this an ethical cloak over a bourgeois movement; Gandhi meant it as the movement’s test.
Ascetic
- Brahmacharya, khadi, and the rejection of luxury are political method. The body is the first colony to free.
- Hind Swaraj’s editor-reader dialogue trains desire, not only opinion.
Man of action
- Passive resistance (later satyagraha) is action without hatred, aimed at converting the opponent.
- The text is a programme: national schools, spinning, and trusteeship-type economy against industrial India.
Tension
- Ambedkar later asked whether ascetic moralism left caste standing. Hind Swaraj’s village can look harmonic in Beteille’s sense while remaining ranked.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD HS[Hind Swaraj] --> M[Moral critique of civilisation] HS --> A[Ascetic self-rule] HS --> AC[Satyagraha action]
Conclusion
In Hind Swaraj Gandhi fuses moral judgement, ascetic discipline, and civil resistance. The book is a manual of action against modern civilisation, and a limit when social revolution is the measure.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Human development approach affirms that education and health -care growth are more important than economic growth. Discuss this issue in the light of post-liberalized Indian society.
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Is Hind Swaraj anti-technology?
It is anti a civilisation that makes Indians dependent. Some tools can be used if they serve swaraj.
-
Does the book ignore untouchability?
Its centre is civilisation versus village. Caste justice is not yet Ambedkar’s question in this text.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2015 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals -
2015 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical -
2015 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How far Gandhiji was trusted by the untouchables -
2015 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Feminization of poverty. -
2015 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss Marxist approach to the analysis of Indian nationalism. -
2015 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the basic tenets of Hindu religion? Is Hinduism based on monotheism or polytheism? -
2015 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Why is it necessary to implement PCPNDT Act in India? -
2015 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Main objective of Tribal sub plan (TSP)
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Elwin defined tribal freedom as protection of land, language, and self-rule. He rejected Ghurye’s assimilation of tribe into Hindu society. Isolation was a shield, not a museum, until contact was fair. Nehruvian Panchsheel borrowed this caution. Law now tries to keep that freedom as rights inside the state.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Phule linked caste domination to the robbery of the peasant. Gulamgiri and the cultivator’s whip made tillers the centre of critique. Satyashodhak schools attacked the knowledge monopoly that kept the field unfree. He is closer to anti-caste agrarian politics than to mild temple reform. Class language came later; the landlord-priest pair was already his target.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system
Caste System
Dumont treats caste as a hierarchical ideology of purity and impurity. Power and wealth are real but encompassed by ritual rank. Homo hierarchicus contrasts with Western equality as a value. Sripuram and Rampura show class and dominant caste that the ideology does not fix. The perspective is necessary for values, insufficient for land and politics.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.