Revision summary
Kinship is relatedness through descent, marriage, and care, not only a joint house. Parsons’s isolated nuclear family does not describe Indian change. Later marriage, migration, divorce, and new parenthood forms diversify households. David Morgan’s practices and Karve’s regional systems are better tools than Morgan’s old stages. Gendered care and caste endogamy continue inside the new household types.
Model answer
Introduction
Kinship is the organised recognition of relatedness through descent, marriage, and care. Patterns today are changing in law, residence, and everyday practice, but they are not disappearing. The assessment must name what is new without announcing the end of the family.
Body
What older models assumed
- Lewis Henry Morgan treated kinship as a classificatory system tied to stages of society. That evolutionary ladder is no longer used as a law of progress.
- Later anthropology, including Claude Levi-Strauss, treated alliance and the exchange of spouses as structure.
- Talcott Parsons described the isolated nuclear family as the form that fitted industrial society in the United States.
- Irawati Karve mapped North and South Indian kinship as different regional systems of descent, marriage, and household.
Patterns now visible
- Later marriage, lower fertility, and longer life change the span of generations living at once.
- Dual-earner households, migration, and urban housing shrink co-residence of joint kin without ending remittance and ritual obligation.
- Divorce, remarriage, single-parent households, and live-in arrangements, recognised in some Indian judgments, multiply forms of household.
- Chosen kin and friendship care appear where marriage is delayed or refused.
- David Morgan’s family practices shift attention from a fixed group to the activities of calling, visiting, and caring that make relatedness.
- Same-sex partnerships and assisted reproduction disturb the old identity of blood, marriage, and parenthood.
Indian specificities
- Joint household ideology remains strong even when brothers live in different cities and share a village house at rites.
- Gotra, clan, and caste endogamy still organise a large share of marriages, now with matrimonial sites as a new market.
- Matrilineal pockets such as the Khasi and the Nair past show that change is not a single path from joint to nuclear.
- A. M. Shah warned against treating the joint family as a simple census headcount of co-residence.
Assessment
- The direction is toward more diverse households and more negotiated practice, not toward the death of kinship.
- Gender remains central: care still falls heavily on women even when the chart of the household looks nuclear.
- Class splits the pattern. Secure professionals buy privacy. Migrant labour depends on village kin as social security.
- Global media spread companionate marriage ideals. Property and honour continue to discipline those ideals.
How to study the change
- Combine census household type with Morgan’s practices and with Karve’s regional map.
- Do not use Parsons’s isolated nuclear family as the Indian destination.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD K[Kinship] --> D[Descent marriage care] D --> H[Diverse households] M[Migration dual earning] --> H P[Morgan family practices] --> H C[Caste endogamy honour] --> L[Continuity] H --> A[Change with continuity]
Conclusion
Kinship today is more diverse in household form, more stretched by migration, and more visible as practice than as a single joint or nuclear type. Morgan’s evolutionary stages do not explain this. Regional systems, gender, and class do. Kinship is changing in pattern. It is not finished as a social institution.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Is Weber's idea of bureaucracy a product of the historical experiences of Europe? Comment
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Has the Indian joint family ended?
Co-residence has declined in many cities. Ritual, property, and care obligations often continue across houses.
-
Is kinship only biology?
No. Law, marriage rules, and care practices make relatedness. Assisted reproduction makes that visible.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does the dramaturgical perspective enable our understanding of everyday life? -
2023 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is reference group theory a universally applicable model? Elucidate -
2023 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What, according to Robert Michels, is the iron law of oligarchy? Do lions folly and foxes in Vilfredo Pareto's theory, essentially differ from each other? Substantiate -
2023 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Do you think that common sense is the starting point of social research? What are its advantages and limitations? Explain -
2023 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Highlight the differences and similarities between totemism and animism -
2023 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the relevance of corporate social responsibility in a world marked by increasing environmental crises -
2023 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyze critically David Morgan's views on family practices -
2023 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Does women's education help to eradicate patriarchal discriminations? Reflect with illustrations
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the distinctiveness of the feminist method of social research? Comment
Sociology as Science
Feminist method starts from women’s everyday work and treats gender as power, not as an extra variable. Smith, Harding, Oakley, and Collins made standpoint, reflexivity, and intersection the core tools. It criticises Durkheim-style distance that treated the male public actor as the normal subject. Indian care work, dowry, and the double day show what occupation surveys miss. The method stays empirical. It is not a substitute for evidence.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the relationship between sociology and political science
Sociology as Science
Both disciplines study power. Political science centres the state. Sociology centres groups and everyday domination. Marx, Weber, Pareto, Michels, and Mills already joined class, party, and elite. Durkheim and Parsons treated the polity as part of a wider social system. Indian elections, Mandal, and civil society research fail if the two fields are sealed. The relation is complementary, not a hierarchy of sciences.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does the dramaturgical perspective enable our understanding of everyday life?
Sociology
Goffman reads everyday life as performance with front and back regions, teams, and face-work. The point is the shared definition of the situation, not a claim that all talk is false. Mead’s Me is made public on this stage. Asylums shows what happens when the back region is removed. The method is strong on encounters and weak as a full theory of class and the state.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.