Revision summary
Taboos are sacred prohibitions. Superstitions are rejected causal beliefs. Science and technology weaken some of both through germ theory, vaccines, and daily tools. Weber’s disenchantment describes the public shift to calculation. Durkheim’s sacred and caste honour explain why many taboos persist. Pulse Polio and menstrual-technology debates show both gain and limit.
Model answer
Introduction
Taboos are prohibitions charged with the sacred or with pollution. Superstitions are causal beliefs that public science rejects. Science and technology can weaken both by offering rival explanations and rival techniques. They do not automatically erase them, because taboos also organise caste, gender, and honour.
Body
How science and technology address them
- Max Weber’s disenchantment named the replacement of magical means by technical calculation in public life.
- Germ theory, vaccines, and the Pulse Polio campaign reduced disease explanations that blamed spirit or fate, though rumour still attacked the same campaigns.
- Astronomy and print weakened some eclipse and omen practices in urban middle classes without ending temple ritual.
- Sanitation engineering and latrine programmes meet purity taboos around faeces and caste labour. Technology without a change in who must clean does not finish the taboo.
- Menstrual restrictions have been challenged by biology teaching and by movements around temples such as Sabarimala, with technology of pads and cups as a parallel material change.
Limits
- Durkheim’s sacred is a social fact. A laboratory result does not dissolve a group’s need for prohibition.
- New technologies create new fears, from radiation talk to vaccine rumour, which are not the old superstition but occupy the same slot of uncontrolled cause.
- Caste pollution rules can absorb scientific language and still exclude.
- Comte’s hope of a full positive age under-estimated this persistence.
Examination
- Role is real in public health, agriculture, and some gender taboos where the state and school back the technique.
- Role is limited where taboo is honour and closure rather than a mistaken cause.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD ST[Science and technology] --> D[Rival cause and tool] D --> W[Weaker omen and spirit talk] T[Taboo as honour caste gender] --> P[Persistence] ST --> P
Conclusion
Science and technology address age-old taboos and superstitions by offering calculation, vaccines, and new tools of daily life, which is Weber’s disenchantment in practice. They do not abolish the sacred as a social fact. Health campaigns show gains. Caste and gender prohibitions show the limit unless power also changes.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2022 · Q1(c)). View answer →
-
If vaccines work, why do rumours continue?
Trust, honour, and political talk organise belief. A working technique does not automatically command consent.
-
Is every ritual a superstition?
No. Ritual can mark belonging without claiming a false physical cause. Superstition is the causal claim science rejects.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically examine the roles of science and technology in social change. What is your opinion on their increasing trend in 'online' education and teaching? -
2024 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss various theories of social change. Explain the limitations of unilinear theory of social change -
2024 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically examine the World-Systems theory of Immanuel Wallerstein in terms of development and dependency of various nations -
2022 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment. -
2022 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Trace the trajectory of development perspectives on social change. -
2022 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Sociologists argue for democratization of science and technology for inclusive development. Comment. -
2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Are traditional social institutions getting weakend as agents of social change in the contemporary society ? Substantiate. -
2022 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
How do you understand the relationship between patriarchy and social development ?
More from this topic
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
To what extent can education and skill development be an agent of social change? Critically analyze.
Social Change in Modern Society
Durkheim and Parsons treat schooling as moral and role socialisation, a force of change. Human capital and capability approaches link skill to productivity and freedom. Bourdieu and correspondence theorists show reproduction of class through the school. Indian expansion of education has created new aspirations and some mobility. Coaching, English, caste and credential inflation limit the equalising effect. The extent is partial: necessary for change, insufficient as a sole agent.
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically examine the World-Systems theory of Immanuel Wallerstein in terms of development and dependency of various nations
Social Change in Modern Society
Wallerstein takes the capitalist world-economy, not the nation, as the unit of analysis. Core, semi-periphery and periphery are linked positions in one division of labour. Development of the core has been historically tied to peripheral constraint. The theory criticises Rostow-style national stages and is cousin to Frank’s underdevelopment thesis. Criticisms include thin treatment of internal class, culture and new industrial cores. It remains a strong map of dependency, provided ranks are not treated as eternal.
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss various theories of social change. Explain the limitations of unilinear theory of social change
Social Change in Modern Society
Social change is theorised as evolution, cycle, conflict, functional adaptation and global hierarchy. Unilinear evolution claims one sequence of stages for all societies. Comte, Morgan and some readings of Marx illustrate the ladder form. Limits include Eurocentrism, teleology and weak handling of collapse and mixture. Multilinear and dependency arguments were developed against that ladder. Differentiation can be kept as a theme without a compulsory staircase.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.