Revision summary
Democratization opens the agenda, access, and risks of S&T to public judgment. Habermas, Harding, Marx, Frank, and Wallerstein explain expert and core monopoly. Narmada, generics, people’s science, and digital ID are test cases. Inclusion can coexist with surveillance and gig degradation. The claim is for a public science, not against method.
Model answer
Introduction
Democratization of science and technology means that the direction of research, the ownership of tools, and the risks of application are opened to public judgment, not left only to labs, firms, and ministries. Inclusive development fails when innovation serves a core of users and dumps risk on a periphery.
Body
Why sociologists argue this
- Jurgen Habermas distinguished technical control from practical and emancipatory knowledge. Science as expert monopoly colonises the lifeworld.
- Sandra Harding’s standpoint and strong objectivity ask whose questions get funded. A science that ignores women’s work or Dalit exposure to toxins is not neutral.
- Karl Marx treated technology as a labour process under capital: machinery can degrade work even as output rises.
- Immanuel Wallerstein and Andre Gunder Frank: patents, labs, and high-tech sit in cores; dirty process and e-waste sit in peripheries.
What democratization looks like
- Public agenda-setting: farmers, patients, and forest users helping name research problems, as in some participatory plant-breeding and people’s science movements.
- Access: generic medicines, open data, and public digital goods versus enclosure.
- Risk consent: nuclear, genetic, and large-dam choices after Narmada-style hearing, not after the concrete is poured.
- Education and language: Census literacy is not enough if scientific citizenship stays English-and-metro.
Inclusive development
- Aadhaar, UPI, and platform work show technology as inclusion and as surveillance or gig degradation together.
- Green revolution raised grain and also regional and class polarisation; the next round of agri-tech repeats the question.
- SHG digital bookkeeping can include women or add unpaid admin labour.
- Climate tech without land rights will not include those Chipko first named.
Comment
- The argument is not anti-science. It is anti-oligarchy of expertise and capital in the name of development.
- Merton’s CUDOS norms already asked for communalism of knowledge; democratization extends that to direction and harm.
- Without it, “development” is growth for some and a new closed stratification of know-how.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD ST[Science and technology] --> EXP[Expert and capital monopoly] DEM[Democratization] --> AG[Public agenda access consent] EXP --> EXCL[Exclusive development] AG --> INC[Inclusive development]
Conclusion
Sociologists argue for democratizing science and technology because expertise and capital otherwise steer development toward cores and degrade work and environments at the edge. Habermas, Harding, Marx, and world-system theory support the claim. Inclusive development needs public agenda, access, and consent, as Narmada and medicine-access fights show.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Are traditional social institutions getting weakend as agents of social change in the contemporary society ? Substantiate.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2022 · Q8(b)). View answer →
-
Does this mean voters should design reactors?
No. It means goals, siting, and harm are public questions. Calculation remains specialist.
-
Is digital India already democratic S&T?
Access widened. Control of data, algorithms, and gig ratings often did not. Inclusion is unfinished.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the role of science and technology in addressing age-old taboos and superstitions -
2022 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment. -
2022 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Trace the trajectory of development perspectives on social change. -
2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Are traditional social institutions getting weakend as agents of social change in the contemporary society ? Substantiate. -
2022 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
How do you understand the relationship between patriarchy and social development ? -
2021 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine the contribution of dependency theories in understanding the present global scenario. -
2021 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Describe the role of Science and Technology in enabling us to face the challenges triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. -
2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Is humanity at the mercy of Nature, Science and Technology ? Comment in the light of pandemic situation.
More from this topic
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
To what extent can education and skill development be an agent of social change? Critically analyze.
Social Change in Modern Society
Durkheim and Parsons treat schooling as moral and role socialisation, a force of change. Human capital and capability approaches link skill to productivity and freedom. Bourdieu and correspondence theorists show reproduction of class through the school. Indian expansion of education has created new aspirations and some mobility. Coaching, English, caste and credential inflation limit the equalising effect. The extent is partial: necessary for change, insufficient as a sole agent.
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically examine the World-Systems theory of Immanuel Wallerstein in terms of development and dependency of various nations
Social Change in Modern Society
Wallerstein takes the capitalist world-economy, not the nation, as the unit of analysis. Core, semi-periphery and periphery are linked positions in one division of labour. Development of the core has been historically tied to peripheral constraint. The theory criticises Rostow-style national stages and is cousin to Frank’s underdevelopment thesis. Criticisms include thin treatment of internal class, culture and new industrial cores. It remains a strong map of dependency, provided ranks are not treated as eternal.
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss various theories of social change. Explain the limitations of unilinear theory of social change
Social Change in Modern Society
Social change is theorised as evolution, cycle, conflict, functional adaptation and global hierarchy. Unilinear evolution claims one sequence of stages for all societies. Comte, Morgan and some readings of Marx illustrate the ladder form. Limits include Eurocentrism, teleology and weak handling of collapse and mixture. Multilinear and dependency arguments were developed against that ladder. Differentiation can be kept as a theme without a compulsory staircase.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.