Q7(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks · 2 min read

← Q4(a) Q5(c) →

Technology has accelerated the process of development and dependency. Discuss.

Topic: Social Change in Modern Society. Syllabus: Social Change in Modern Society: Sociological theories of social change; Development and dependency; Agents of social change; Education and social change; Science, technology and social change. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2020 and Social Change in Modern Society.

Revision summary

Technology can raise yields, health, and administrative capacity. The same tools can deepen dependency through patents, platforms, and data rents. Frank, Wallerstein, and Cardoso map dependent development. Gig modernisation can be informalisation. Gendered care is not automatically solved by apps. Both processes accelerate; ownership decides the mix.

Model answer

Introduction

Technology raises productivity and connects markets. That can look like development. The same tools can deepen dependency when patents, platforms, and standards sit in a core. A. G. Frank and Immanuel Wallerstein named the second process. Both can run together.

Body

Acceleration of development

  • W. W. Rostow treated technique as a take-off lever. Green Revolution yields and digital public goods in India show real gains in output and delivery.
  • Max Weber’s rationalisation: calculation, records, and machines thicken modern organisation.
  • Public health techniques cut some deaths. That is development as capability, after Amartya Sen.

Acceleration of dependency

  • Frank’s development of underdevelopment: technology arrives as a package with surplus drain.
  • Patents, software stacks, and platform rents keep the periphery as a user. Cardoso’s dependent development still fits some manufacturing.
  • Labour platforms informalise work while looking modern, a capitalist shell Jan Breman would recognise.
  • Data colonialism: Indian users feed models owned elsewhere.

How they couple

  • A UPI rail can be developmental and still sit on hardware and chip dependencies.
  • Skill polarisation: a few engineers, many gig riders. Class, not only nation, is the unit.
  • Gender: care apps do not automatically end unpaid labour, as Ann Oakley would note.

Discuss

  • Technology is not a neutral accelerator. It accelerates the path already structured by class and world-system.
  • Delinking every chip is fantasy. Bargaining over standards and public tech is the political middle.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  TECH[Technology] --> DEV[Productivity health delivery]
  TECH --> DEP[Patents platforms drain]
  WS[World-system class] --> PATH[Which arrow wins]
  TECH --> PATH

Conclusion

Technology has accelerated development as productivity, health, and state capacity. It has also accelerated dependency as patents, platforms, and informalised modern work. Frank and Wallerstein remain relevant; Rostow’s one-way machine does not. Discuss both arrows, and name who owns the tool.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2022 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment.

    View answer →

  2. 2022 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Trace the trajectory of development perspectives on social change.

    View answer →

  3. 2022 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Sociologists argue for democratization of science and technology for inclusive development. Comment.

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Are traditional social institutions getting weakend as agents of social change in the contemporary society ? Substantiate.

    View answer →

  5. 2021 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Critically examine the contribution of dependency theories in understanding the present global scenario.

    View answer →

  6. 2021 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Describe the role of Science and Technology in enabling us to face the challenges triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic.

    View answer →

  7. 2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Is humanity at the mercy of Nature, Science and Technology ? Comment in the light of pandemic situation.

    View answer →

  8. 2019 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    What is civil society ? Present a note on civil society engagement with science and technology policy in India

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

To what extent can education and skill development be an agent of social change? Critically analyze.

Social Change in Modern Society

Durkheim and Parsons treat schooling as moral and role socialisation, a force of change. Human capital and capability approaches link skill to productivity and freedom. Bourdieu and correspondence theorists show reproduction of class through the school. Indian expansion of education has created new aspirations and some mobility. Coaching, English, caste and credential inflation limit the equalising effect. The extent is partial: necessary for change, insufficient as a sole agent.

Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Critically examine the World-Systems theory of Immanuel Wallerstein in terms of development and dependency of various nations

Social Change in Modern Society

Wallerstein takes the capitalist world-economy, not the nation, as the unit of analysis. Core, semi-periphery and periphery are linked positions in one division of labour. Development of the core has been historically tied to peripheral constraint. The theory criticises Rostow-style national stages and is cousin to Frank’s underdevelopment thesis. Criticisms include thin treatment of internal class, culture and new industrial cores. It remains a strong map of dependency, provided ranks are not treated as eternal.

Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

Discuss various theories of social change. Explain the limitations of unilinear theory of social change

Social Change in Modern Society

Social change is theorised as evolution, cycle, conflict, functional adaptation and global hierarchy. Unilinear evolution claims one sequence of stages for all societies. Comte, Morgan and some readings of Marx illustrate the ladder form. Limits include Eurocentrism, teleology and weak handling of collapse and mixture. Multilinear and dependency arguments were developed against that ladder. Differentiation can be kept as a theme without a compulsory staircase.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.