Revision summary
COVID-19 was organised by labs, states, and inequalities, not by gadgets alone. Merton’s science norms met vaccine nationalism. Apps and WFH extended bureaucratic control; gig riders took exposure. Digital divide and reverse migration split the experience. Beck’s risk and dependency of patents mark the politics of S&T.
Model answer
Introduction
COVID-19 was a biological event organised by science, the state, and everyday inequality. Robert Merton’s sociology of science, Ulrich Beck’s risk society, and Michel Foucault’s biopolitics are better guides than a hymn to gadgets. Technology saved lives and rationed them.
Body
Science as institution
- Merton’s CUDOS norms (communism of knowledge, universalism, disinterestedness, organised scepticism) were strained by vaccine nationalism and preprint noise.
- Laboratories, trials, and the WHO made a global fact. Dependency theory notes who owned patents and who waited.
Technology of control and care
- Testing, sequencing, oxygen plants, and mRNA and other vaccine platforms were productive forces in Marx’s sense, suddenly politicised.
- Apps, lists, and work-from-home dashboards extended Weber’s iron cage into the phone. Surveillance mixed with relief.
- Gig delivery and platform ratings kept urban middle-class consumption alive while riders faced exposure.
Unequal experience
- Digital divide: online school and telemedicine for some; informal workers without data, documents, or a Census-stable address.
- Reverse migration was a low-tech fact of walking bodies beside a high-tech media of infection curves.
- Gendered unpaid care absorbed hospital overflow at home.
Risk, trust, and the public
- Beck’s risk society: manufactured uncertainty, expert disagreement, and blame.
- Durkheim: anomie when rules of gathering, work, and funeral broke; new rituals online.
- Civil controversy over lockdown science showed that “follow the science” is also a political sentence.
Democratisation question
- Inclusive development needs shared vaccines, open data, and occupational safety, not only a national app.
- Informal labour remained outside most techno-fixes.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD ST[Science and technology] --> VAC[Vaccines tests oxygen] ST --> APP[Apps WFH surveillance] ST --> UNQ[Patents digital divide] COVID[COVID-19] --> ST MIG[Reverse migrants] --> LOW[Low-tech walk] PROF[Salaried] --> APP
Conclusion
Science and technology shaped COVID-19 as vaccines, files, apps, and WFH, and as patent and digital inequality. Merton, Beck, Weber, and Frank’s hierarchy explain the split. The migrant walk and the laptop office were one pandemic, two technological worlds.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Is humanity at the mercy of Nature, Science and Technology ? Comment in the light of pandemic situation.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2020 · Q4(a)). View answer →
-
Did technology cause the migrant crisis?
No. Informal work and a sudden halt did. Technology then counted cases more easily than it counted walkers.
-
Is an app a public health system?
It can support tracing. Without testing, care, and food it is a file, not a hospital.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment. -
2022 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Trace the trajectory of development perspectives on social change. -
2022 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Sociologists argue for democratization of science and technology for inclusive development. Comment. -
2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Are traditional social institutions getting weakend as agents of social change in the contemporary society ? Substantiate. -
2022 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
How do you understand the relationship between patriarchy and social development ? -
2021 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine the contribution of dependency theories in understanding the present global scenario. -
2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Is humanity at the mercy of Nature, Science and Technology ? Comment in the light of pandemic situation. -
2020 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Technology has accelerated the process of development and dependency. Discuss.
More from this topic
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
To what extent can education and skill development be an agent of social change? Critically analyze.
Social Change in Modern Society
Durkheim and Parsons treat schooling as moral and role socialisation, a force of change. Human capital and capability approaches link skill to productivity and freedom. Bourdieu and correspondence theorists show reproduction of class through the school. Indian expansion of education has created new aspirations and some mobility. Coaching, English, caste and credential inflation limit the equalising effect. The extent is partial: necessary for change, insufficient as a sole agent.
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically examine the World-Systems theory of Immanuel Wallerstein in terms of development and dependency of various nations
Social Change in Modern Society
Wallerstein takes the capitalist world-economy, not the nation, as the unit of analysis. Core, semi-periphery and periphery are linked positions in one division of labour. Development of the core has been historically tied to peripheral constraint. The theory criticises Rostow-style national stages and is cousin to Frank’s underdevelopment thesis. Criticisms include thin treatment of internal class, culture and new industrial cores. It remains a strong map of dependency, provided ranks are not treated as eternal.
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss various theories of social change. Explain the limitations of unilinear theory of social change
Social Change in Modern Society
Social change is theorised as evolution, cycle, conflict, functional adaptation and global hierarchy. Unilinear evolution claims one sequence of stages for all societies. Comte, Morgan and some readings of Marx illustrate the ladder form. Limits include Eurocentrism, teleology and weak handling of collapse and mixture. Multilinear and dependency arguments were developed against that ladder. Differentiation can be kept as a theme without a compulsory staircase.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.