Revision summary
COVID-19 showed bodily dependence on nature and on laboratory technique. Exposure was socially structured: crowding, care work, migrant walks. Beck’s risk society and Latour’s hybrids fit better than raw surrender. Science healed and also excluded and surveilled. Vaccine nationalism showed hierarchy in science itself. Comment: dependent, not equally at mercy.
Model answer
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic showed humans as bodies in a viral ecology, as patients of laboratories, and as subjects of apps, lockdowns, and vaccines. Mercy here means dependence without control. Humanity was not helpless in every sense. It was exposed.
Body
Nature
- A zoonotic virus reminded us that society sits in nature, which Karl Marx already treated as metabolism with the earth.
- Density, wet markets, and global travel are social natures, not a revenge of a pure wilderness.
- Ulrich Beck’s risk society: manufactured uncertainties return as side-effects of our own organisation.
Science and technology
- Virology, oxygen plants, and mRNA platforms were conditions of survival, not optional culture.
- Bruno Latour’s hybrids: the virus-in-the-PCR-machine is neither raw nature nor pure society.
- Technology also harmed: misinformation, exclusion from telemedicine, and surveillance apps.
Mercy or relation?
- Emile Durkheim’s social facts include mortality rates that no one person authors, as the pandemic curve showed.
- Max Weber’s rationalisation met a limit: calculation lagged the pathogen.
- Informal labour and migrant walks in India showed that “humanity” was stratified. Ann Oakley’s care work and caste crowding were the real mercy map.
Comment
- At the mercy of nature: yes as bodies; no as if culture did not shape exposure.
- At the mercy of science and technology: dependent on them, and also governed by those who own labs and platforms.
- The pandemic was a teacher of interdependence, not of simple surrender.
After the peak
- Vaccine nationalism and patent fights showed science as a world-system good, after Immanuel Wallerstein’s sense of hierarchy.
- Memory of lockdown is now a social fact for a cohort.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD NAT[Viral nature] --> EXP[Exposure] SCI[Science technology] --> EXP SCI --> HEAL[Vaccine oxygen] SOC[Class caste gender] --> EXP EXP --> COV[COVID-19 situation]
Conclusion
In the pandemic, humanity was at the mercy of a natural pathogen and of the sciences and techniques that named, tracked, and sometimes healed it. Comment: dependence is real; equal mercy is false. Marx’s metabolism, Beck’s risk, and Indian migrant labour show a structured exposure, not a single human fate.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Technology has accelerated the process of development and dependency. Discuss.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2020 · Q7(a)). View answer →
-
Did science save us, or did it fail?
It produced vaccines and oxygen knowledge. It did not equally deliver them. Both are true.
-
Is the next pandemic destiny?
Ecology and travel make risk likely. Public health capacity decides how much mercy we beg.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment. -
2022 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Trace the trajectory of development perspectives on social change. -
2022 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Sociologists argue for democratization of science and technology for inclusive development. Comment. -
2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Are traditional social institutions getting weakend as agents of social change in the contemporary society ? Substantiate. -
2021 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine the contribution of dependency theories in understanding the present global scenario. -
2021 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Describe the role of Science and Technology in enabling us to face the challenges triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. -
2020 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Technology has accelerated the process of development and dependency. Discuss. -
2019 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is civil society ? Present a note on civil society engagement with science and technology policy in India
More from this topic
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
To what extent can education and skill development be an agent of social change? Critically analyze.
Social Change in Modern Society
Durkheim and Parsons treat schooling as moral and role socialisation, a force of change. Human capital and capability approaches link skill to productivity and freedom. Bourdieu and correspondence theorists show reproduction of class through the school. Indian expansion of education has created new aspirations and some mobility. Coaching, English, caste and credential inflation limit the equalising effect. The extent is partial: necessary for change, insufficient as a sole agent.
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically examine the World-Systems theory of Immanuel Wallerstein in terms of development and dependency of various nations
Social Change in Modern Society
Wallerstein takes the capitalist world-economy, not the nation, as the unit of analysis. Core, semi-periphery and periphery are linked positions in one division of labour. Development of the core has been historically tied to peripheral constraint. The theory criticises Rostow-style national stages and is cousin to Frank’s underdevelopment thesis. Criticisms include thin treatment of internal class, culture and new industrial cores. It remains a strong map of dependency, provided ranks are not treated as eternal.
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss various theories of social change. Explain the limitations of unilinear theory of social change
Social Change in Modern Society
Social change is theorised as evolution, cycle, conflict, functional adaptation and global hierarchy. Unilinear evolution claims one sequence of stages for all societies. Comte, Morgan and some readings of Marx illustrate the ladder form. Limits include Eurocentrism, teleology and weak handling of collapse and mixture. Multilinear and dependency arguments were developed against that ladder. Differentiation can be kept as a theme without a compulsory staircase.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.