Revision summary
Patriarchy is male dominance across household, work, and state. It shapes development by hiding care, skewing property, and producing capability failure. Sen, NFHS, SHGs, and feminized labour show mixed gains and a double day. Parsons and modernisation underplayed this structure. Inclusive development must reorganise care and voice, not only output.
Model answer
Introduction
Patriarchy is a system of male dominance across household, work, sexuality, culture, and the state. Social development is the expansion of capabilities, security, and participation. The relation is not accidental. Development that leaves patriarchy intact is a partial and often self-blocking process.
Body
Patriarchy as structure
- Sylvia Walby named six structures of patriarchy. Ann Oakley made unpaid housework visible as a development variable, not a private leftover.
- Friedrich Engels tied women’s subordination to property and the monogamous family. The household still reproduces labour-power without a wage.
- Sandra Harding’s standpoint: development indicators written from a male public actor miss care, mobility, and violence.
How patriarchy shapes development
- Human development: Amartya Sen’s missing women and capability failure show that growth can coexist with sex-selective harm. NFHS sex ratio, anaemia, and agency items are the Indian dashboard.
- Education and fertility can rise while property and office stay male. That is stratified development.
- Labour: feminization of work and SHGs expand women’s market presence and can intensify the double day.
- Political development: reserved panchayat seats include women and still meet proxy representation where kin patriarchy holds.
- Environmental and displacement projects, as in Narmada, distribute costs through male land title and female livelihood in commons.
How development can unsettle patriarchy
- Schooling, own income, and law against domestic violence shift bargaining.
- Public care, land in women’s names, and enforcement of inheritance are structural, not sermon, counters.
- They do not automatically win. Backlash in honour politics and in online misogyny is also “change”.
Theoretical caution
- Parsons treated the family as latency for the system; that functional story naturalises patriarchy as development’s helper.
- Modernisation theory expected patriarchy to fade with industry. It reappears in gig ratings, caste endogamy, and office glass ceilings.
- World-system development can use cheap female labour in garments as a competitive edge, which Frank would read as a gendered periphery.
Understanding, stated
- Patriarchy is a constraint on whose development counts.
- Social development that is inclusive has to reorganise care, property, and voice, not only raise GDP.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD PAT[Patriarchy] --> CARE[Unpaid care property violence] DEV[Social development] --> CAP[Capabilities voice security] CARE --> UNQ[Unequal development] CAP --> CHAL[Can unsettle patriarchy] CHAL --> PAT
Conclusion
Patriarchy organises the household, labour, and state so that social development is unequally distributed. Oakley, Walby, Engels, Harding, and Sen make that relation thinkable. NFHS, SHGs, panchayat proxies, and Narmada show it. Development without a shift in patriarchy is growth with a male face.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Critically examine the contribution of dependency theories in understanding the present global scenario.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q7(b)). View answer →
-
Does GDP growth reduce patriarchy by itself?
No. Growth can buy sex selection and cheap female labour. Law, property, and care policy have to change too.
-
Are SHGs a sufficient anti-patriarchal development tool?
They can raise voice and income. They do not by themselves transfer land, stop violence, or end unpaid care.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the role of science and technology in addressing age-old taboos and superstitions -
2022 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment. -
2022 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Trace the trajectory of development perspectives on social change. -
2022 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Sociologists argue for democratization of science and technology for inclusive development. Comment. -
2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Are traditional social institutions getting weakend as agents of social change in the contemporary society ? Substantiate. -
2021 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine the contribution of dependency theories in understanding the present global scenario. -
2021 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Describe the role of Science and Technology in enabling us to face the challenges triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. -
2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Is humanity at the mercy of Nature, Science and Technology ? Comment in the light of pandemic situation.
More from this topic
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
To what extent can education and skill development be an agent of social change? Critically analyze.
Social Change in Modern Society
Durkheim and Parsons treat schooling as moral and role socialisation, a force of change. Human capital and capability approaches link skill to productivity and freedom. Bourdieu and correspondence theorists show reproduction of class through the school. Indian expansion of education has created new aspirations and some mobility. Coaching, English, caste and credential inflation limit the equalising effect. The extent is partial: necessary for change, insufficient as a sole agent.
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically examine the World-Systems theory of Immanuel Wallerstein in terms of development and dependency of various nations
Social Change in Modern Society
Wallerstein takes the capitalist world-economy, not the nation, as the unit of analysis. Core, semi-periphery and periphery are linked positions in one division of labour. Development of the core has been historically tied to peripheral constraint. The theory criticises Rostow-style national stages and is cousin to Frank’s underdevelopment thesis. Criticisms include thin treatment of internal class, culture and new industrial cores. It remains a strong map of dependency, provided ranks are not treated as eternal.
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss various theories of social change. Explain the limitations of unilinear theory of social change
Social Change in Modern Society
Social change is theorised as evolution, cycle, conflict, functional adaptation and global hierarchy. Unilinear evolution claims one sequence of stages for all societies. Comte, Morgan and some readings of Marx illustrate the ladder form. Limits include Eurocentrism, teleology and weak handling of collapse and mixture. Multilinear and dependency arguments were developed against that ladder. Differentiation can be kept as a theme without a compulsory staircase.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.