Revision summary
NAM was India’s bipolar-era instrument: Belgrade 1961, refuse camps, keep voice. Delhi now practises multi-alignment and invests in G20, Quad and 2+2s more than in NAM theatre. Indifference is real because India was NAM’s engine; without it the Movement thins. A future remains as a Global South UN-and-development caucus, not as Cold War neutrality. Verdict: damaged as Indian doctrine, not automatically dead as a membership habit.
Model answer
Introduction
The Non-Aligned Movement, born at Belgrade 1961 after Bandung’s moral rehearsal, was India’s gift to a bipolar world: refuse camp membership, keep voice. India’s present practice is multi-alignment — Quad one week, BRICS and Moscow the next — with NAM often treated as a museum. The question is whether the Movement has a future despite that indifference, not whether Delhi will lead a revival parade.
Body
Indifference is real
Summit photography has shifted to G20, SCO, Quad and bilateral 2+2s. NonAlignment 2.0 (2012) already spoke India’s language more than NAM communiqués. Jaishankar’s energetic diplomacy uses issue-based coalitions. Younger officials read NAM as a speech, not a security system. That indifference matters because India was NAM’s intellectual engine. Without a willing engine, a 120-odd member body becomes a caucus of the willing-to-attend.
Why NAM can still live
The Global South still needs a room that is not the OECD, not NATO, and not a Chinese classroom. On Gaza, on climate finance, on WHO equity, and on tariff shocks from a returning Trump, many NAM members want a universality that is not Western by default — the theme of Q7(c). Africa and Southeast Asia did not join the Quad. They still vote at the UN in clusters NAM helped socialise. The Movement’s future is as a normative and voting caucus, not as a military non-doctrine for a world without two camps.
Verdict
- NAM has a future if it becomes a South–South consultative platform with modest aims: coordinate UN positions, defend policy space, and talk development. It has no future as Nehru’s moral bipolarity, because bipolarity is gone and India will not sacrifice the Quad for a Havana paragraph. India’s indifference is therefore damaging but not fatal. Others — Indonesia, South Africa, a returning Egypt — can convene. If they do not, NAM will linger as an annual adjective. The honest 10-mark line: the Movement survives as a Global South habit; it does not survive as India’s master doctrine.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD NAM[NAM 1961] --> CW[Cold War neutrality] NAM --> GS[Possible Global South caucus] IN[Indian indifference] --> MA[Multi-alignment] MA -.does not kill.-> GS
Conclusion
India’s indifference has retired NAM as Delhi’s organising idea. It has not erased a large membership that still needs a non-alliance roof. NAM’s future is a South caucus, or it is folklore.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Historical ties between India and Japan grew into a 'special strategic and global partnership'. Comment.
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Did India leave NAM?
No. It has de-emphasised it. Formal membership and occasional attendance are not the same as doctrinal centrality.
-
Is multi-alignment just NAM with better branding?
It shares autonomy. It drops the allergy to security minilaterals with the U.S. That drop is the indifference the question names.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
India's reluctance to perceive any 'existential threat' inevitably made the multilateral path to nuclear security a 'default option' until it decided to cross nuclear Rubicon in 1998. Identify and analyze some of the major reasons behind this shift in India's position on the nuclear question -
2024 · Q1(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
The changing global order and ongoing regional conflicts, with the global powers taking sides, have jeopardized the progress made towards disarmament in the past. Comment. -
2024 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Do you agree with the view that the USA uses NATO as a traditional tool of strategy to perpetuate its hegemony in the world? -
2024 · Q8(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the implications of the scrapping of the Free Movement Regime with Myanmar by the Indian Government on the complex ethno-political dynamics of the north-eastern region. -
2023 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"During the Cold War, the Non-Aligned Movement tried to become a Third force in World Politics, but failed because it was too large and unwieldy." Discuss -
2023 · Q3(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Account for the rise of European Union as a highly influential regional organisation -
2023 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the various constraints on American hegemony today. Which of these are likely to become more prominent in the future? -
2023 · Q6(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Arms trade, economic ties and congruent geo-political interests are no longer the three pillars of India - Russia relationship in the emerging strategic context. Comment
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the psychological approach to the study of comparative politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The psychological approach studies personality, attitudes, civic culture and cognition in comparative politics. Lasswell, Adorno, Almond and Verba, Easton and later political psychology are the main lineage. It explains voting, protest, obedience and leadership better than a constitution or a class map alone. Surveys, experiments and psychobiography are typical methods. It is a layer, not a substitute for institutions and political economy.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Neo-liberalism lightened neo-realism's dark view of international politics. Comment.
Comparative Politics
Waltzian neorealism pictures anarchy, self-help and relative gains as a dark constant. Keohane and Nye’s neoliberalism keeps anarchy but adds complex interdependence, regimes and absolute gains. Institutions reduce cheating and transaction costs; they do not create a world state. Ukraine, tariffs and health-governance shocks show both residual darkness and institutional repair. The ‘lightening’ is cooperation under anarchy, not the end of power politics.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the non-traditional security threats in the context of food and environmental crises.
Comparative Politics
Non-traditional security covers harms beyond organised military attack: food, environment, health, cyber and crime. Food security is availability, access, utilisation and stability; war, climate and export bans can all break it. Environmental crisis is a threat multiplier through climate, water, disaster and migration. UNDP 1994 human security and Buzan’s sectors supply the theory. These shocks overload the state and also force cooperation through FAO, WHO, Paris and regional reserves.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.