Revision summary
India and Sri Lanka share people-to-people, security and neighbourhood-first ties, including the civil-war and 13th Amendment file. Chinese infrastructure credit, Colombo Port City and the Hambantota lease created economic presence with strategic meaning for Delhi. Colombo used China to hedge Indian political weight, especially on Tamil issues. The 2022 debt crisis restored India’s role as first financier and IMF-era partner. Strain is real omni-enmeshment, not a finished Chinese capture of the island.
Model answer
Introduction
India and Sri Lanka share religion, language zones, a narrow strait, and a long security intimacy, including India’s role in the civil-war years and in the 13th Amendment debate. Those deep ties have been strained as China financed infrastructure and gained economic presence, most famously at Hambantota. The analysis must hold both facts: strain is real; geography and the 2022 crisis still pull Colombo toward Delhi.
Body
Deep ties
Tamil Nadu politics, fisheries, Buddhism, and Indian tourists and investment are everyday links. India is a first responder in disaster and, in 2022, in credit, fuel and currency support when Sri Lanka’s sovereign debt collapsed. Defence dialogues and the neighbourhood-first claim treat the island as vital ground in the Indian Ocean, which is why the Indo-Pacific vocabulary of 5(d) includes Sri Lanka whether Colombo likes the label or not.
China’s economic dominance as politics
Chinese loans and contractors built ports, highways and the Colombo Port City vision. Hambantota port’s long lease after debt distress became the global example of a strategic asset shifting under commercial stress. For India, a Chinese-run deep port on the southern flank, plus possible dual-use visits, is a security externalities problem like Bhutan’s border, only maritime. Colombo’s earlier governments used Chinese money to reduce dependence on India, especially when Delhi was associated with Tamil concerns and with 1987 intervention memory.
Strains show up as delayed energy projects with India, mixed messages on Chinese ‘research’ vessels, and domestic Sri Lankan politics that treat Indian proximity as interference and Chinese proximity as development.
Analyse, do not flatten
China did not buy Sri Lankan identity. It bought time and concrete when Indian and Western finance were slower or more conditional. The 2022 default damaged the Chinese model’s reputation as costless. India’s aid, IMF-linked recovery, and renewed talk of connectivity (ports, power, tourism) showed that economic dominance is reversible in influence if not in every lease. Tamil aspirations and fishermen’s livelihoods remain Indian domestic constraints that China does not carry.
- The relationship is therefore a triangle: Colombo hedges; Beijing builds; Delhi both resents and remains indispensable. Strain is the price of a neighbour’s omni-enmeshment. It is not a completed loss of the island.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD T[Deep India-Sri Lanka ties] --> S[Strain] CH[China loans ports] --> H[Hambantota] H --> S CR[2022 crisis Indian support] --> R[Residual Indian cards]
Conclusion
India–Sri Lanka ties remain thick in people, security and crisis finance. Chinese investment, Hambantota and port-city politics have strained that intimacy by giving Colombo another paymaster. The 2022 crash showed the limit of that paymaster. Analysis should register strain without writing India out of the map.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Would you concur with the view that of late, India's foreign policy has been in a transition mode from Nehruvianism to Neoliberalism? Support your answer with the help of suitable examples.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Is Hambantota a Chinese naval base?
It is a commercial lease with dual-use anxiety. Treating it as an announced PLAN base overstates the public record and understates the risk Delhi actually manages.
-
Did India lose Sri Lanka?
It lost exclusivity. It did not lose first-responder status or the strait. Those are different losses.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
China's growing footprint and a tangible shift in power dynamics in Bangladesh has weakened India's leverage in Dhaka. Comment. -
2025 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
For India, a multipolar world order would also mean a multipolar Asia. Comment. -
2024 · Q6(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Would you concur with the view that of late, India's foreign policy has been in a transition mode from Nehruvianism to Neoliberalism? Support your answer with the help of suitable examples. -
2023 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the major features of India's Foreign Policy in the 21st century. -
2023 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"India's Nuclear policy is deeply influenced by its cultural beliefs and the pragmatic approach of its foreign policy." Discuss -
2023 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What steps has India taken to regain its foothold in Afghanistan since the Taliban has taken over the country in August 2021? -
2023 · Q8(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the significance of "West Asia Quad" in the light of India's 'Look West' policy -
2022 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Peaceful co-existence remains the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Comment.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the interpretive approach to the study of comparative politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The interpretive approach studies political action as meaning in context, following Weber’s verstehen and later cultural and linguistic turns. It replies to behaviouralism’s search for covering laws by asking how votes, nations and authority are understood locally. Thick description, ethnography and discourse analysis are typical tools. It explains legitimacy, nationalism and everyday state practice that a constitution or a class map alone cannot supply. Limits are relativism, weak generalisation, and neglect of material and institutional constraint if used alone.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the central tenets of the World-Systems Theory.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
Wallerstein’s unit is the capitalist world-economy since the long sixteenth century, not the isolated nation-state. Core, semi-periphery and periphery form a durable three-tier division of labour. Unequal exchange and strong/weak states move surplus toward the core. The theory rejects modernisation’s national ladder and differs from Waltz’s interstate anarchy as first cause. Limits include economic determinism and underplaying state autonomy and culture; mobility exists but hierarchy persists.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
The expansionist tendencies of the current Russian regime indicate its intentions for the realization of a Greater Russia on the lines of the Soviet era. Comment.
Comparative Politics
Russia’s wars in Georgia and Ukraine, plus pressure on Belarus and nuclear signalling, show expansionist intent in the post-Soviet space. The Greater Russia story denies full independence of neighbours, especially Ukraine. The Soviet analogy fits geography of control more than ideology: today’s regime is nationalist and oligarchic, not a communist world-system. Morgenthau and Waltz explain power and structure; they do not make the war merely defensive. Comment: accept expansionism; reject a simple USSR restoration.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.