Revision summary
India’s Bangladesh leverage after 2009 was tied to Sheikh Hasina; her 2024 exit opened space for China. Beijing’s BRI projects, credit and defence courtship give Dhaka an omni-enmeshment option. Indian delays on Teesta, a trade surplus and political optics of patronage stored grievances. The shift weakens Delhi’s privileged access but does not erase geography, power trade or transit. A less personality-based Neighbourhood First is the repair, not a hyper-realist sulk.
Model answer
Introduction
- India’s Bangladesh policy after 2009 rested on a close bet on Sheikh Hasina: security cooperation against northeast insurgents, transit, power trade, and a managed border. That bet was jolted when Hasina left office in August 2024 and an interim order under Muhammad Yunus began to reopen the external field. China’s growing footprint is both cause and beneficiary of that shift. India’s leverage in Dhaka has weakened. It has not vanished.
Body
The tangible shift
- Beijing already sat in Bangladesh’s infrastructure: bridges, power plants, and Belt and Road credit. After 2024, political permission for a more visible China — defence conversation, extra projects, and a less embarrassed equidistance — increased. For a smaller state, omni-enmeshment is rational: play India and China, as Nepal and Sri Lanka have. Reports of Chinese interest in dual-use facilities and of Dhaka’s wish to diversify arms away from a single neighbour are the security reading. The Teesta water file, long stalled, became a symbol of Indian delay that China offered, rhetorically, to fill with projects.
Why Indian leverage thinned
Leverage was personalised around Awami League networks and around India’s role as the 1971 midwife. It under-priced domestic anger: jobless youth, alleged electoral closure, and the optics of Delhi as a patron. A large bilateral trade surplus in India’s favour, occasional border killings, and CAA–NRC sensitivities among Bangladeshi Muslims were stored grievances. When the regime broke, those grievances became foreign policy. China does not carry 1971’s emotional debt; it carries cash and a UN veto.
Comment
The statement is largely right as a trend, overstated as a verdict. India remains the market, the electricity grid partner, the transit geography to the northeast, and the cultural neighbour. Delhi still holds visas, river data, and the capacity to spoil. A hyper-realist over-reaction would push Dhaka further east. A smarter line is Neighbourhood First with less regime-personality: water-sharing, trade access, and quiet security coordination that does not look like tutelage. China’s rise in the Bay is real. India’s loss is political capital, not the map.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD H[Hasina-era bet] --> S[Shock 2024] S --> C[China footprint] S --> L[Thinner Indian leverage] G[Geography grids rivers] --> I[Residual Indian cards]
Conclusion
China’s opening in a post-Hasina Bangladesh has cut India’s privileged access. Geography, grids and markets still give Delhi cards. Leverage is weaker because it was too personal and too slow on water and trade dignity. It is not yet a lost neighbourhood.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
For India, a multipolar world order would also mean a multipolar Asia. Comment.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2025 · Q5(c)). View answer →
-
Has Bangladesh ‘switched camps’?
No. It is widening options. Camp-switch language is a Delhi anxiety, not a Dhaka communiqué.
-
Does 1971 still matter?
As memory, yes, especially among some elites. As a blank cheque for Indian influence, 2024 showed it does not.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
For India, a multipolar world order would also mean a multipolar Asia. Comment. -
2024 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Despite deep ties, India's relations with Sri Lanka have seen strains due to China's growing influence in Sri Lanka through investments and economic dominance. Analyse. -
2024 · Q6(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Would you concur with the view that of late, India's foreign policy has been in a transition mode from Nehruvianism to Neoliberalism? Support your answer with the help of suitable examples. -
2023 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the major features of India's Foreign Policy in the 21st century. -
2023 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"India's Nuclear policy is deeply influenced by its cultural beliefs and the pragmatic approach of its foreign policy." Discuss -
2023 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What steps has India taken to regain its foothold in Afghanistan since the Taliban has taken over the country in August 2021? -
2023 · Q8(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the significance of "West Asia Quad" in the light of India's 'Look West' policy -
2022 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Peaceful co-existence remains the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Comment.
More from this topic
Q5(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
For India, a multipolar world order would also mean a multipolar Asia. Comment.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
A multipolar world is several great-power centres; it is hollow for India if Asia is Sino-centric. India’s threats, trade and waters are Asian, so Asian power-sharing is the real test of the slogan. Japan, ASEAN centrality, Korea, Australia and India beside China and the U.S. are the intended map. Quad and FOIP are instruments of pluralism, not a finished concert. The claim is right as strategy and still aspirational as fact.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Would you concur with the view that of late, India's foreign policy has been in a transition mode from Nehruvianism to Neoliberalism? Support your answer with the help of suitable examples.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
Nehruvianism meant NAM, UN moralism and refusal of blocs; neoliberalism in this debate means markets, U.S. partnership and globalisation. 1991, Act East, the U.S. nuclear bargain and the Quad are the visible transition. India still refuses formal alliance, keeps Russia, defends WTO policy space and talks Global South — Nehruvian residues. Concur partly: instruments have shifted; doctrine of autonomy has not been abolished. Multi-alignment is the mix, not a clean replacement of one school by the other.
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Despite deep ties, India's relations with Sri Lanka have seen strains due to China's growing influence in Sri Lanka through investments and economic dominance. Analyse.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
India and Sri Lanka share people-to-people, security and neighbourhood-first ties, including the civil-war and 13th Amendment file. Chinese infrastructure credit, Colombo Port City and the Hambantota lease created economic presence with strategic meaning for Delhi. Colombo used China to hedge Indian political weight, especially on Tamil issues. The 2022 debt crisis restored India’s role as first financier and IMF-era partner. Strain is real omni-enmeshment, not a finished Chinese capture of the island.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.