Revision summary
India and South Africa asked for a wide TRIPS waiver on COVID health products. The 2022 Ministerial Decision was a limited, conditional easing for vaccines. Tests and treatments were not given the same treatment. Technology transfer, not only law, remained the production bottleneck. The outcome was a compromise that preserved TRIPS more than it waived it.
Model answer
Introduction
India and South Africa proposed a broad TRIPS waiver in 2020 so that patents would not block COVID-19 vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics. The June 2022 Ministerial Decision was a narrower, time-bound compromise. It was not the waiver as drafted.
Body
What a TRIPS waiver would have been
- A waiver would have suspended specified TRIPS obligations for a set of COVID products so that more producers could copy and export without each patent-holder’s permission.
- Developing-country demand was for speed, coverage of vaccines plus treatments and tests, and simple eligibility.
What the 2022 decision was
- Members authorised a limited easing of compulsory-licensing rules for COVID-19 vaccines, with conditions on eligible members, duration, and notification.
- Diagnostics and therapeutics were left for later discussion, not covered in the same way.
- Legal complexity remained. Many manufacturers still needed technology transfer, not only a legal permission.
- Export and eligibility clauses were tighter than the India–South Africa text.
Comment
- Keohane’s regime view fits: the WTO produced a bargain that kept the TRIPS regime standing rather than opening a hole in it.
- Cox’s view also fits: intellectual-property order serving research firms in the core was protected while a public-health emergency was met with a minimum deal.
- India could still use existing TRIPS flexibilities and its own vaccine production. The political point is that the club did not rewrite IP for the South.
- Calling the outcome a waiver in headlines was inaccurate. It was a compromise that left TRIPS largely intact.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[India South Africa waiver 2020] --> M[WTO 2022 Ministerial] M --> V[Limited vaccine CL ease] M --> X[Diagnostics therapeutics deferred] V --> T[TRIPS regime still standing]
Conclusion
The COVID-19 vaccine decision at the WTO eased some compulsory-licensing steps for vaccines. It was not the broad TRIPS waiver India and South Africa sought. The regime survived the pandemic with a narrow carve-out.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Why do ethnic conflicts and insurgencies continue to remain major impediments to regional co-operation in South Asia?
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Did India stop making vaccines because there was no waiver?
No. Indian firms produced large volumes under other arrangements. The waiver fight was about global legal space and later products, not about a total stop in Pune or Hyderabad.
-
Why do writers still say waiver?
Political branding. The legal text is a limited decision on vaccine compulsory licensing, not a general TRIPS holiday.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the crucial functions of empirical political theory in Comparative Politics? -
2023 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the difficulties faced by a political theorist in comparing the States? -
2023 · Q1(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
How does democratic politics construct citizenship? -
2023 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Narrate the various ways in which rapid environmental degradation is posing a serious threat to human security. Illustrate your answer with suitable examples -
2023 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What do you mean by offensive and defensive realism? -
2023 · Q7(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the challenges and limitations in India - Iran relations? -
2023 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the major drivers of India's interests in Africa -
2022 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the main limitations of the comparative method to the study of Political Science.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the crucial functions of empirical political theory in Comparative Politics?
Comparative Politics
Empirical political theory studies observable political facts with concepts that evidence can test. Its functions are description, classification, explanation, middle-range theory, and checking claims against practice. It shifted Comparative Politics from legal texts alone toward behaviour and institutions. Sartori’s warning against conceptual stretching is part of that discipline. It does not cancel culture or critical theory; it supplies the evidence those approaches still need.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the difficulties faced by a political theorist in comparing the States?
Comparative Politics
States are unlike in size, history, and capacity, so the unit of comparison is not automatic. Conceptual stretching, Galton’s problem, and selection bias are standard difficulties. Data are political products, and language changes the meaning of institutions. Interdependence means States are not independent experiments. Designs such as most-similar cases reduce error; they do not remove it.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
How does democratic politics construct citizenship?
Comparative Politics
Citizenship in a democracy is made by law, votes, and social rights, not only by birth records. Marshall’s civil, political, and social rights describe how that status has thickened. Parties, movements, and civic education teach people to act as citizens. Democracies still contest migrants, minorities, and documents of belonging. Construction is therefore both inclusion and a fight over who is inside.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.