Q5(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q5 Q5 →

What are the reasons for lack of 'regionness' in South Asia?

Topic: India and South Asia. Syllabus: India and South Asia: Regional Co-operation; South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation; South Asian Economic cooperation; Impediments to regional co-operation; India and the Look East / Act East policy. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2023 and India and South Asia.

Revision summary

Regionness is shared political identity plus working institutions. South Asia has a dominant India, a blocked India–Pakistan pair, and Chinese alternatives for smaller States. SAARC consensus cannot produce EU-style spillover. Security is a conflict complex, not a community. BIMSTEC is a work-around that still does not make a South Asian region.

Model answer

Introduction

Regionness means a shared political identity and working regional institutions, as in the European Union’s dense law. South Asia has geography and some culture in common. It has not produced that political region.

Body

Structural reasons

  • India is so much larger in economy, military, and population that neighbours fear a centre rather than join a club. Asymmetry is the first fact.
  • India–Pakistan conflict over Kashmir, terrorism, and nuclear signalling blocks SAARC, which works by consensus.
  • Extra-regional China offers arms, infrastructure, and political backing that lets smaller States hedge against India.

Identity and security

  • Barry Buzan’s regional security complex idea fits: South Asia is a conflict formation, not a security community.
  • Nationalisms, Partition memory, and majority–minority politics inside States make a thin regional “we.”
  • Ethnic conflict and insurgency, treated in 5(d), spill across borders and poison trust.

Institutional thinness

  • SAARC’s charter and the South Asian Free Trade Area did not create EU-style spillover. Mitrany’s functional path needs a political floor that is missing.
  • BIMSTEC and the Bay of Bengal exclude Pakistan and still move slowly. They prove the demand for work-arounds, not the existence of regionness.
  • People-to-people trade and culture exist. They have not been turned into a regional political community.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  A[Indian asymmetry] --> S[Weak SAARC]
  P[India Pakistan conflict] --> S
  C[China hedge] --> S
  S --> R[Low regionness]

Conclusion

South Asia lacks regionness because of Indian asymmetry, the India–Pakistan freeze, Chinese extra-regional pull, and conflictual identities. Geography is not a region in the EU sense without institutions and trust.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2024 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks

    Does the idea of the 21st century as 'Asian century' continue to remain feasible given the growing friction between India and China?

    View answer →

  2. 2023 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

    Why do ethnic conflicts and insurgencies continue to remain major impediments to regional co-operation in South Asia?

    View answer →

  3. 2022 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

    Discuss the ways and means to realise greater economic co-operation among the Member States of South Asia.

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

    Discuss the steps required to realise hydro-co-operation between India and Bangladesh.

    View answer →

  5. 2022 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks

    What are the implications of 'Look-East' Policy on the north-eastern region of India?

    View answer →

  6. 2021 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

    Discuss the strategic implications of India's Look East Policy transforming into Act East Policy.

    View answer →

  7. 2021 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks

    Why South Asia is considered as the world's politically and economically least integrated region? Explain

    View answer →

  8. 2021 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks

    Relations between India and Russia are rooted in history, mutual trust and mutually beneficial cooperation. Discuss

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

What are the crucial functions of empirical political theory in Comparative Politics?

Comparative Politics

Empirical political theory studies observable political facts with concepts that evidence can test. Its functions are description, classification, explanation, middle-range theory, and checking claims against practice. It shifted Comparative Politics from legal texts alone toward behaviour and institutions. Sartori’s warning against conceptual stretching is part of that discipline. It does not cancel culture or critical theory; it supplies the evidence those approaches still need.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

What are the difficulties faced by a political theorist in comparing the States?

Comparative Politics

States are unlike in size, history, and capacity, so the unit of comparison is not automatic. Conceptual stretching, Galton’s problem, and selection bias are standard difficulties. Data are political products, and language changes the meaning of institutions. Interdependence means States are not independent experiments. Designs such as most-similar cases reduce error; they do not remove it.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

How does democratic politics construct citizenship?

Comparative Politics

Citizenship in a democracy is made by law, votes, and social rights, not only by birth records. Marshall’s civil, political, and social rights describe how that status has thickened. Parties, movements, and civic education teach people to act as citizens. Democracies still contest migrants, minorities, and documents of belonging. Construction is therefore both inclusion and a fight over who is inside.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.