Revision summary
Look East opened India to ASEAN after 1991. Act East thickens defence, connectivity, and Indo-Pacific talk. China and the Himalaya give the policy a balancing edge. ASEAN centrality is still the diplomatic method. It is alignment, not a formal eastern NATO.
Model answer
Introduction
Look East began as a post-1991 economic turn to ASEAN. Act East, named in 2014, keeps that trade core and adds security, connectivity, and the Indo-Pacific. The implication is a more military-diplomatic east, not a renamed brochure.
Body
From Look to Act
- P. V. Narasimha Rao’s Look East sought investment, ASEAN dialogue, and a post-Cold War Asian identity.
- Act East raised the tempo: summit regularity, north-east and Myanmar connectivity, and defence exercises with Vietnam, Japan, Australia, and the United States.
- The Quad’s revival sits in the same theatre even when India refuses NATO language.
Strategic implications
- China is the unspoken referent: Himalayan pressure and the South China Sea make the east a second front of balancing.
- ASEAN centrality remains the diplomatic ticket. India must deliver on connectivity or Act East looks like speeches.
- The north-east becomes a land bridge, which ties internal security to foreign policy.
- Indo-Pacific vocabulary links the Bay of Bengal to the wider maritime commons.
What does not follow
- It is not a military alliance. It is issue-based alignment plus economic unfinished business.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD LE[Look East 1990s] --> AE[Act East 2014] AE --> T[ASEAN trade] AE --> S[Security Quad Indo-Pacific] AE --> C[Connectivity north-east]
Conclusion
Look East was trade and ASEAN belonging. Act East adds deterrence, connectivity, and Indo-Pacific presence. The strategic implication is hedging China while staying inside ASEAN-led process.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Why South Asia is considered as the world's politically and economically least integrated region? Explain
Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q7(a)). View answer →
-
Is Act East only about China?
China is the main security driver. Trade with ASEAN and the north-east’s development are stated goals in their own right.
-
Did Look East fail?
It built dialogue-partner status. Delivery on roads and trade share lagged, which is why “Act” was added.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Does the idea of the 21st century as 'Asian century' continue to remain feasible given the growing friction between India and China? -
2023 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the reasons for lack of 'regionness' in South Asia? -
2023 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Why do ethnic conflicts and insurgencies continue to remain major impediments to regional co-operation in South Asia? -
2022 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the ways and means to realise greater economic co-operation among the Member States of South Asia. -
2022 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the steps required to realise hydro-co-operation between India and Bangladesh. -
2022 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the implications of 'Look-East' Policy on the north-eastern region of India? -
2021 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Why South Asia is considered as the world's politically and economically least integrated region? Explain -
2021 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Relations between India and Russia are rooted in history, mutual trust and mutually beneficial cooperation. Discuss
More from this topic
Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Does the idea of the 21st century as 'Asian century' continue to remain feasible given the growing friction between India and China?
India and South Asia
The Asian century meant a shift of growth and weight to Asia with China and India as co-engines. Doklam, Galwan, a hard LAC and Chinese Indian Ocean presence make China India’s central strategic problem. Trade can continue without a political concert; the Quad and BRI are rival organising projects. Economically the shift to Asia can still happen; politically the century looks contested or bipolar, not harmonious. Feasible as theatre of world politics, not as a Sino-Indian team.
Q5(d) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Why do ethnic conflicts and insurgencies continue to remain major impediments to regional co-operation in South Asia?
India and South Asia
Insurgency and ethnic war in South Asia routinely cross borders. Sanctuary charges, refugees, and military alerts replace trade talks. SAARC and road-and-port plans stall on insecure stretches, including Afghanistan 2021 and Myanmar 2021. Domestic ethnic politics also block a regional “we.” Cooperation needs a security floor that these conflicts remove.
Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the reasons for lack of 'regionness' in South Asia?
India and South Asia
Regionness is shared political identity plus working institutions. South Asia has a dominant India, a blocked India–Pakistan pair, and Chinese alternatives for smaller States. SAARC consensus cannot produce EU-style spillover. Security is a conflict complex, not a community. BIMSTEC is a work-around that still does not make a South Asian region.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.