Revision summary
After 1857 the colonial property and revenue order produced Deccan, Pabna, indigo, and Malabar-type agrarian unrest. Gandhi’s Champaran and Kheda campaigns nationalised peasant grievances without making Congress a class party of the poor. Kisan Sabhas, Bardoli, Awadh, Tebhaga, and communist agrarian work pushed rent, occupancy, and landlordism onto the political agenda. Guha’s subaltern reading and Ambedkar’s caste caution both warn against treating ‘the peasantry’ as one subject. These movements expanded the national struggle and left land reform as a founding task of the republic.
Model answer
Introduction
Between the Revolt of 1857 and Independence, Indian peasants were not a silent backdrop to elite nationalism. They fought rent, debt, plantation discipline, and the colonial state’s revenue. Their movements were local and often caste- or region-specific, yet they repeatedly forced the Indian National Congress and the left to take the agrarian question seriously.
Body
After 1857: revenue, rent, and the new property order
1857 itself had a large peasant and taluqdar face in Awadh. After its defeat, British rule tightened the legal order of zamindari, ryotwari, and money-lending. Deccan riots of 1875 against Marwari and Gujarati sahukars, the Pabna agrarian leagues of the 1870s in Bengal, and the Mappila outbreaks in Malabar showed a pattern: cash revenue, collapsing prices, and insecure occupancy. Ranajit Guha later read such episodes as peasant insurgency with its own political grammar, not as a mere appendix to Congress.
Indigo in 1859–60 and later plantation belts tied peasants to export agriculture. Punjab’s canal colonies created a different proprietary peasantry.
Twentieth-century mass agrarian politics
Champaran (1917) and Kheda (1918) brought Gandhi into peasant India. The 1920s–30s saw Awadh’s Kisan Sabha, Sahajanand Saraswati, Bardoli under Patel, and the 1921 Moplah rising. Tebhaga (1946–47) demanded a two-thirds crop share. Congress wanted a united front; the left wanted landlordism abolished. Ambedkar reminded that the peasant is caste-divided. The All India Kisan Sabha (1936) institutionalised the agrarian left. These struggles widened nationalism beyond the town and left land reform as an unfinished founding task.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Peasants 1857-1947] --> R[Revenue rent debt] P --> N[National movement] N --> G[Gandhian satyagraha] N --> K[Kisan Sabha / left] P --> L[Land question at 1947]
Conclusion
Peasant movements from 1857 to 1947 were struggles over revenue, rent, debt, and dignity. They entered the national movement on Gandhi’s terms and on the Kisan Sabha’s terms, never fully on one script. Independence inherited both their energy and their unfinished demand for land.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Write a note on the Dalit perspective of Indian National Movement
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Were peasant movements nationalist by nature?
They were first about land and survival. They became nationalist when colonial law and revenue were named as the enemy, which was often but not always the case.
-
Why did Congress hesitate on class war in the countryside?
It sought a broad anti-British coalition that included substantial peasants and some landlords, and it feared a split that the Raj could exploit.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q4(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
The foundational base of western democracy has been shaped by Locke's ideas of constitutionalism, freedom and property. Elucidate -
2025 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Hannah Arendt analysed a few categories of vita activa. Explain -
2025 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Do you think that legitimacy acquired by consent or manufactured by indoctrination is an essential element in maintenance of political rule? Justify your answer with relevant examples -
2025 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Write a note on the Dalit perspective of Indian National Movement -
2025 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Delineate the key factors that have shaped the evolving political landscape in Jammu and Kashmir post 2019 -
2025 · Q6(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Parliamentary Committees are a strong tool of Parliamentary Democracy. It provides for the opportunity for cross-pollination of ideas among members of the Parliament. Discuss -
2025 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Enunciate the impediments to women's participation in local governance in the process of political decentralisation -
2025 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Caste remains a vital axis for political mobilisation in India. How would the caste census address the aspirations of people? Discuss
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the Philosophical approach to the study of Political theory
Political Theory
The philosophical approach treats political theory as reasoned inquiry into meaning, right, and the good regime. It defines concepts such as the state, obligation, and justice, and tests them against rival claims. Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, Hegel, and Rawls are central practitioners of this method. Strauss, Oakeshott, Berlin, and Arendt show that texts and categories still organise modern debate. The approach is not a substitute for behavioural data or institutional history, but it supplies questions that measurement cannot invent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Write a note on the relation between equality and liberty from the multi-cultural perspective
Political Theory
Liberty is non-arbitrary space of action; equality is the claim that this space belongs to every person. Mill and Berlin warn that liberty can be crushed in the name of a single real self or a uniform good. Taylor, Kymlicka, and Parekh show that recognition and group-differentiated rights can be liberal tools in diverse societies. Uniform rules may still silence minorities; group vetoes may still silence women and dissenters inside a community. The Indian Constitution already pairs equal citizenship with cultural rights, which is the practical form of this relation.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the Macpherson's view on power
Political Theory
Macpherson read Hobbes and Locke as theorists of possessive individualism: the person as owner of capacities in a market society. The liberal state in that reading mainly protects property and contract. He then distinguished extractive power, which takes benefit from others, from developmental power, which is the ability to unfold human capacities. Democracy should be judged by equal developmental power, not only by elections or negative liberty. The argument retrieves an ethical liberalism and a non-authoritarian Marxism against a thin competitive elite model of democracy.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.