Revision summary
Caste remains a mobilisation axis because it still structures dignity, land, and access to the state, as Kothari, Mandal, and bahujan politics show. Parties already count jatis; the demand is that the official Census should too, beyond SC and ST. Aspirations include fairer reservation design, targeting of welfare, and recognition after the unpublished 2011 SECC caste data. Risks include reification of identity and a pure percentage war that forgets class, gender, and Ambedkar’s horizon of annihilation. A democratic census would publish usable aggregates while protecting persons and keeping constitutional individual rights at the centre.
Model answer
Introduction
Caste remains a vital axis of Indian political mobilisation because it still organises marriage, land, dignity, and the queue for the state. Parties speak the language of development; they count jatis at the booth. A caste census is demanded as the statistical twin of that politics: if caste is how power is lived, the republic should know the numbers on which quotas, schemes, and tickets rest.
Body
Mobilisation
From the Non-Brahmin movement and Periyar through Lohia’s backward-caste socialism, the Mandal moment of 1990, and the BSP’s bahujan project under Kanshi Ram and Mayawati, caste has been a language of both hierarchy and revolt. Upper-caste consolidation, OBC federations, and Dalit assertion are modern ways of claiming the vote, the job, and the police station, not pre-modern leftovers. Every alliance in Bihar or Uttar Pradesh remains a caste arithmetic.
Aspirations are a share of education and jobs, protection from atrocity, and dignity in temples and streets. Rajni Kothari still holds: politics processes caste; it does not erase it. Parties already count jatis at every booth; the demand is that the official Census should too.
What a caste census is asked to do
The last full caste count was 1931, apart from SC and ST. The 2011 SECC caste table was not released. Advocates say Indra Sawhney’s ceiling, the Rohini fragmentation of OBC quotas, and welfare targeting fly blind without numbers. The census is asked to rebalance reservation, check elite jati capture, and recognise a structure the republic otherwise names only at elections.
Risks and a democratic handling
A census can freeze identities and turn justice into a percentage auction that forgets class and gender inside a jati. Ambedkar wanted annihilation of caste, not its eternal administration. Used as a tool of honest equality, with private records and public aggregates, the count can still be a first step of seeing. Mobilisation will not wait for the table; the table may civilise it or intensify it. A democratic handling therefore keeps constitutional individual rights at the centre even while it counts groups for welfare and representation.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD M[Caste mobilisation] --> V[Vote job dignity] CC[Caste census] --> N[Numbers for quota and welfare] N --> A[Aspirations: share and recognition] N --> R[Risk: freeze and auction] M --> CC
Conclusion
Caste mobilises because it still distributes power. A caste census is asked to match that fact with public knowledge, so that reservation and welfare rest on evidence rather than on the loudest federation. It can serve equality if it is a tool of justice; it will harm equality if it becomes a permanent auction of percentages without a horizon beyond caste.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
There is a debate on the procedure for appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners to the Election Commission of India. Analyse its various aspects
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Does a caste census strengthen caste?
It can, if politics stops at percentages. It can also weaken unjust monopoly if it reveals who actually captures benefits and who remains unseen.
-
Is SC/ST counting already a caste census?
It is a partial one. The political demand is to count OBCs and others with the same official seriousness, because mobilisation already does.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q4(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
The foundational base of western democracy has been shaped by Locke's ideas of constitutionalism, freedom and property. Elucidate -
2025 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Hannah Arendt analysed a few categories of vita activa. Explain -
2025 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Do you think that legitimacy acquired by consent or manufactured by indoctrination is an essential element in maintenance of political rule? Justify your answer with relevant examples -
2025 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain briefly the role of Peasant Movements after 1857 and before independence -
2025 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Write a note on the Dalit perspective of Indian National Movement -
2025 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Delineate the key factors that have shaped the evolving political landscape in Jammu and Kashmir post 2019 -
2025 · Q6(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Parliamentary Committees are a strong tool of Parliamentary Democracy. It provides for the opportunity for cross-pollination of ideas among members of the Parliament. Discuss -
2025 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Enunciate the impediments to women's participation in local governance in the process of political decentralisation
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the Philosophical approach to the study of Political theory
Political Theory
The philosophical approach treats political theory as reasoned inquiry into meaning, right, and the good regime. It defines concepts such as the state, obligation, and justice, and tests them against rival claims. Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, Hegel, and Rawls are central practitioners of this method. Strauss, Oakeshott, Berlin, and Arendt show that texts and categories still organise modern debate. The approach is not a substitute for behavioural data or institutional history, but it supplies questions that measurement cannot invent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Write a note on the relation between equality and liberty from the multi-cultural perspective
Political Theory
Liberty is non-arbitrary space of action; equality is the claim that this space belongs to every person. Mill and Berlin warn that liberty can be crushed in the name of a single real self or a uniform good. Taylor, Kymlicka, and Parekh show that recognition and group-differentiated rights can be liberal tools in diverse societies. Uniform rules may still silence minorities; group vetoes may still silence women and dissenters inside a community. The Indian Constitution already pairs equal citizenship with cultural rights, which is the practical form of this relation.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the Macpherson's view on power
Political Theory
Macpherson read Hobbes and Locke as theorists of possessive individualism: the person as owner of capacities in a market society. The liberal state in that reading mainly protects property and contract. He then distinguished extractive power, which takes benefit from others, from developmental power, which is the ability to unfold human capacities. Democracy should be judged by equal developmental power, not only by elections or negative liberty. The argument retrieves an ethical liberalism and a non-authoritarian Marxism against a thin competitive elite model of democracy.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.