Q13 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2021 · GS III · 15 marks · 3 min read

← Q12 Q5 →

What are the salient features of the National Food Security Act, 2013 ? How has the Food Security Bill helped in eliminating hunger and malnutrition in India?

Topic: Farm Subsidies and PDS. Syllabus: Issues related to direct and indirect farm subsidies and minimum support prices; Public Distribution System — objectives, functioning, limitations, revamping; issues of buffer stocks and food security; Technology missions; economics of animal-rearing. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2021 and Farm Subsidies and PDS.

Revision summary

NFSA covers up to 75 per cent of rural and 50 per cent of urban population through TPDS. Priority persons get 5 kg a month at Rs 3/2/1; AAY gets 35 kg per household. Maternity benefit, ICDS, and mid-day meals are statutory, with a food security allowance if grain fails. The Act reduced starvation risk and proved its pipeline in COVID years. Malnutrition persists because the entitlement is cereal-heavy and care, WASH, and diet diversity sit outside the ration shop.

Model answer

Introduction

The National Food Security Act, 2013 turned cheap grain from a scheme into a legal entitlement. It covers up to 75 per cent of the rural and 50 per cent of the urban population through the Targeted Public Distribution System, and it links maternity and child feeding to statute. It has reduced starvation risk for millions. It has not eliminated hunger or malnutrition.

Body

Salient features of NFSA 2013

  • Coverage ceiling: up to 75 per cent rural and 50 per cent urban population as eligible households.
  • Priority households receive 5 kg per person per month of grain at Rs 3/2/1 per kg for rice, wheat, and coarse cereals.
  • Antyodaya Anna Yojana households retain 35 kg per household per month.
  • Identification of eligible households is left to States within the ceiling, with women as heads of ration cards where possible.
  • Pregnant women and lactating mothers are entitled to a maternity benefit of not less than Rs 6,000, besides nutritious food through ICDS.
  • Children get age-wise meals through ICDS and the mid-day meal (now PM-POSHAN) as legal rights, not only administrative schemes.
  • Food Security Allowance is due if entitled grain is not supplied.
  • Grievance redress, transparency, and a role for local bodies are written into the Act. TPDS remains the delivery spine.

How the Act has helped

  • A rights-based PDS expanded and regularised cheap calories, which cuts starvation deaths and distress grain prices in poor districts when it works.
  • Aadhaar and portability (One Nation One Ration Card) later made the same entitlement more usable for migrants, which the 2013 text anticipated as reform of TPDS.
  • ICDS and school meals as statute made it harder to quietly close feeding centres. That supports child calorie access even when it does not by itself fix diets.
  • During COVID, NFSA plus extra Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan grain showed the value of an existing legal pipeline.

Why hunger and malnutrition are not eliminated

  • NFSA is largely a cereal entitlement. Hidden hunger is about protein, fat, iron, and diet diversity. Cheap rice does not end anaemia.
  • Leakage, exclusion errors, and quality complaints persist even after digitisation, especially where State capacity is thin.
  • Maternity benefit in practice has often been narrower than the Act’s Rs 6,000 vision (PMMVY design and budgets).
  • NFHS rounds still show high stunting, wasting, and anaemia. That is malnutrition with a full PDS in many States.
  • Open-market price spikes, WASH, women’s education, and care time decide nutrition as much as the ration shop.
  • Global Hunger Index methods are debated, but domestic anthropometry is enough to reject a claim of elimination.

What would complete the Bill’s promise

  • Fortification where safe, pulses and millets in PDS, ICDS quality, and POSHAN convergence.
  • Keep the legal grain floor; add diet quality rather than declaring victory.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  N[NFSA 2013] --> P[TPDS 75 percent rural 50 percent urban]
  N --> M[Maternity ICDS MDM rights]
  P --> H[Less starvation risk]
  M --> H
  D[Cereal-only leakage care gaps] --> K[Hunger and malnutrition remain]

Conclusion

NFSA 2013 made cheap grain, maternity feeding, ICDS, and mid-day meals justiciable for a large covered population. It has helped against hunger as starvation. It has not eliminated malnutrition, because calories at Rs 3 are not a complete diet or a complete care system.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2024 · Q14 · GS III · 15 marks

    Elucidate the importance of buffer stocks for stabilizing agricultural prices in India. What are the challenges associated with the storage of buffer stock? Discuss.

    View answer →

  2. 2023 · Q14 · GS III · 15 marks

    What are the direct and indirect subsidies provided to farm sector in India? Discuss the issues raised by the World Trade Organization(WTP) in relation to agricultural subsidies.

    View answer →

  3. 2022 · Q3 · GS III · 10 marks

    What are the major challenges of Public Distribution System (PDS) in India ? How can it be made effective and transparent ?

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q12 · GS III · 15 marks

    Do you think India will meet 50 percent of its energy needs from renewable energy by 2030 ? Justify your answer. How will the shift of subsidies from fossil fuels to renewables help achieve the above objective ? Explain.

    View answer →

  5. 2015 · Q5 · GS III · 12 marks

    In what way could replacement of price subsidy with direct benefit Transfer (DBT) change the scenario of subsidies in India? Discuss.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q14 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS III · 15 marks

Elucidate the importance of buffer stocks for stabilizing agricultural prices in India. What are the challenges associated with the storage of buffer stock? Discuss.

Farm Subsidies and PDS

Buffer stocks buy rice and wheat at MSP so harvest prices do not crash, and release them through PDS and open sale so retail prices do not spike. FCI and State agencies hold the central cereal pool; a Price Stabilisation Fund is used for some pulses and perishables. Storage challenges: CAP exposure, rodents and fungus, high carrying cost, and stocks piled in a few surplus States. A rice-wheat mountain does not automatically cool onion or tur inflation. Silos, WDRA warehouses and a wider commodity set are the storage reforms that match the price-stability claim.

Q14 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS III · 15 marks

What are the direct and indirect subsidies provided to farm sector in India? Discuss the issues raised by the World Trade Organization(WTP) in relation to agricultural subsidies.

Farm Subsidies and PDS

Direct subsidies include fertiliser, power, irrigation, crop-loan subvention, PM-KISAN and insurance premium support. Indirect subsidies include MSP, public procurement, food subsidy, and cheap public research and seed. WTO Amber Box covers trade-distorting price and input support, with 10 per cent de minimis for developing countries. Green Box is uncapped if genuinely non-distorting; Blue Box is production-limiting payments. The peace clause protects public stockholding from disputes pending a permanent solution.

Q12 · UPSC Mains 2022 · GS III · 15 marks

Do you think India will meet 50 percent of its energy needs from renewable energy by 2030 ? Justify your answer. How will the shift of subsidies from fossil fuels to renewables help achieve the above objective ? Explain.

Farm Subsidies and PDS

Panchamrit targets 50 per cent of installed electric capacity from non-fossil sources by 2030, including hydro and nuclear. That is not 50 per cent of energy needs, and not even 50 per cent of electricity generation, because solar and wind have lower capacity factors. Half of all energy from renewables by 2030 is unlikely given oil and industrial coal. The capacity target is more plausible if transmission, storage and discom health improve. Shifting subsidies from fossils to renewables and storage helps relative prices and manufacturing; social fuels need targeted DBT, not a blunt cut.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.