Revision summary
North-East insurgency survives, not only starts, because of hill terrain and retreat across Myanmar and other borders. Identity, homeland and migration politics continue to supply recruits after decades. Extortion on contracts and highways, plus narcotics, fund groups when popular support falls. Splinter factions outlive peace talks; AFSPA-era resentment can still be used in propaganda. Mizoram-type accords plus Act East connectivity show that persistence is political and economic, not inevitable.
Model answer
Introduction
The North-East has seen armed groups since the 1950s, from Naga hills to Assam, Manipur and Tripura. Some peace accords have worked in part; other outfits splinter and return. Survival of insurgency is not the same as its origin. Groups last because terrain, identity politics, money, and a porous frontier still give them a living, even when the original demand has been diluted.
Body
Major reasons the armed insurgency survives
- Terrain and logistics: hills, forest and monsoon tracks favour ambush and hideouts; security forces cannot hold every ridge the way they hold a plains district.
- Porous borders with Myanmar, Bangladesh and Bhutan (historically) allow safe havens, arms, and retreat; even after Bhutan's 2003 operations, Myanmar camps have mattered for several groups.
- Identity and homeland claims: Naga integration, Assamese versus 'foreigner' politics after migration, Kuki-Meitei-Naga triangles in Manipur, and tribal autonomy demands keep a political story that recruits youth.
- Demographic fear in Assam and Tripura, rooted in Partition and later migration, feeds groups that claim to defend the 'sons of the soil' even after electoral politics occupies the same space.
- Underdevelopment and isolation: a thin industrial base, the old Chicken's Neck connectivity, and high unemployment make extortion and 'taxes' on highways, contractors and oil a parallel economy that funds cadres.
- Splintering of talks: when a faction signs an accord, a hard-line split continues the gun; Naga talks illustrate how a ceasefire can coexist with residual violence.
- Easy weapons and narcotics on the Myanmar-China edge, and links with organised crime, replace declining political donations.
- Governance gaps: delayed accords, corruption in local contracts, and heavy-handed security (including resentment around Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act in notified areas) can refresh the recruiter's narrative even when the public is tired of the underground.
- Ethnic inter-group rivalry means one surrender does not pacify a district; another community's outfit fills the vacuum.
- External political sympathy and, in earlier decades, alleged foreign intelligence play, gave oxygen; even reduced, the habit of looking across the border remains.
Why this is persistence, not fate
- Where roads, Act East trade, and credible Sixth Schedule or accord politics deliver jobs, cadres fade, as in parts of Mizoram after the 1986 accord.
- Survival is therefore reproduced by money, hills, and unfinished political settlement, not by a single ancient hatred that policy cannot touch.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD T[Terrain porous borders] --> S[Survival of armed groups] I[Identity migration homelands] --> S M[Extortion narcotics] --> S P[Splintered accords AFSPA resentment] --> S A[Act East jobs political settlement] --> E[Fade of cadres]
Conclusion
Armed insurgency has lasted in the North-East because hills and borders give sanctuary, identity and migration politics still recruit, and extortion plus narcotics pay the gun when ideology thins. Splintered talks and development that does not reach the hill district keep the cycle. Lasting peace needs settlement of core political claims, Myanmar-border cooperation, and livelihoods that beat the underground tax, not only more battalions.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
The terms 'Hot Pursuit' and 'Surgical Strikes' are often used in connection with armed action against terrorist attacks. Discuss the strategic impact of such actions.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2016 · Q17). View answer →
-
Is insurgency in the North-East only about underdevelopment?
Underdevelopment funds and recruits it, but identity, borders and unfinished accords are equally why the gun lasts.
-
Do peace accords end all armed groups?
They can end the main war, as in Mizoram. Splinters and rival ethnic outfits often continue unless the political deal is wide and livelihoods follow.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q10 · GS III · 10 marks
The Government of India recently stated that Left Wing Extremism (LWE) will be eliminated by 2026. What do you understand by LWE and how are the people affected by it? What measures have been taken by the government to eliminate LWE? -
2023 · Q19 · GS III · 15 marks
What are the internal security challenges being faced by India? Give out the role of Central Intelligence and Investigative Agencies tasked to counter such threats. -
2023 · Q20 · GS III · 15 marks
Give out the major sources of terror funding in India and efforts being made to curtail these sources. In the light of this, also discuss the aim and objective of the ' No Money for Terror [NMFT]' Conference recently held at New Delhi in November 2022. -
2022 · Q20 · GS III · 15 marks
Naxalism is a social, economic and developmental issue manifesting as a violent internal security threat. In this context, discuss the emerging issues gest a multilayered strategy to tackle the menace of Naxalism. -
2019 · Q9 · GS III · 10 marks
The banning of 'Jammat-e-Islami' in Jammu and Kashmir brought into focus the role of over-ground workers (OGWs) in assisting terrorist organizations. Examine the role played by OGWs in assisting terrorist organizations in insurgency affected areas. Discuss measures to neutralize influence of OGWs. -
2018 · Q10 · GS III · 10 marks
Left Wing Extremism (LWE) is showing a downward trend, but still affects many parts of the country. Briefly explain the Government of India's approach to counter the challenges posed by LWE. (150 Words, 10 Marks). -
2016 · Q17 · GS III · 12 marks
The terms 'Hot Pursuit' and 'Surgical Strikes' are often used in connection with armed action against terrorist attacks. Discuss the strategic impact of such actions. -
2015 · Q19 · GS III · 12 marks
The persisting drives of the government for development of large industries in backward areas have resulted in isolating the tribal population and the farmers who face multiple displacements. With Malkangiri and Naxalbari foci, discuss the corrective strategies needed to win the Left Wing Extremism (LWE) doctrine affected citizens back into mainstream of social and economic growth.
More from this topic
Q19 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS III · 15 marks
What are the major challenges to internal security and peace process in the North-Eastern States? Map the various peace accords and agreements initiated by the government in the past decade.
Internal Security and Extremism
The Northeast’s security problems mix leftover insurgency, ethnic conflict, drugs, migration and Myanmar-China borders. The 2020 Bodo Accord and 2021 Karbi Accord were the big Assam settlements of the decade. The 2015 Naga framework agreement is still not a final peace. The 2020 Bru-Reang deal and 2023 UNLF pact sit beside Manipur’s 2023 ethnic violence. Assam’s border agreements with Meghalaya and Arunachal tried to quiet inter-State maps.
Q10 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS III · 10 marks
The Government of India recently stated that Left Wing Extremism (LWE) will be eliminated by 2026. What do you understand by LWE and how are the people affected by it? What measures have been taken by the government to eliminate LWE?
Internal Security and Extremism
Left Wing Extremism in India means the Maoist insurgency centred on central Indian forest-tribal belts. Villagers suffer killings, extortion, closed schools and the crossfire of operations. Official figures show fewer severely affected districts and fewer deaths than at the peak. SAMADHAN combines intelligence, camps, surrenders and connectivity. A 2026 ‘end’ is credible as a shrinking map, not as the death of every idea; development and forest rights decide whether the map stays quiet.
Q20 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS III · 15 marks
Give out the major sources of terror funding in India and efforts being made to curtail these sources. In the light of this, also discuss the aim and objective of the ' No Money for Terror [NMFT]' Conference recently held at New Delhi in November 2022.
Internal Security and Extremism
Major sources are overseas patronage, hawala, narcotics, counterfeit notes, extortion, misuse of non-profits, and emerging crypto rails. India uses UAPA, PMLA, NIA, FIU-IND, FCRA, narcotics and fake-currency drives, and FATF standards. The No Money for Terror conference in New Delhi in November 2022 was the third ministerial on terror finance. Its aim was joint investigation, freezing, and no safe haven for financiers, including new payment tech. International cooperation is required because the money chain is rarely inside one country.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.