Q1 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2020 · GS II · 10 marks · 2 min read

Q2 →

"There is a need for simplification of procedure for disqualification of persons found guilty of corrupt practices under the Representation of peoples Act" Comment.

Topic: Governance and Policy. Syllabus: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2020 and Governance and Policy.

Revision summary

Corrupt practices are listed in Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Election petitions in the High Court and Section 8A disqualification by the President after the Election Commission’s opinion are separate, slow tracks. A member can sit through much of a term while the petition and the 8A file move. Lily Thomas made conviction-based disqualification immediate; the corrupt-practice route was not similarly tightened. Time-bound petitions and a single visible disqualification consequence would match the Act’s purpose.

Model answer

Introduction

Corrupt practice under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, is meant to keep a tainted candidate out of the House. The procedure that converts a High Court finding into actual disqualification is slow, split across forums, and easy to game with appeals. Simplification is therefore a democratic need, not a drafting nicety.

Body

What the law already does

  • Section 123 of the RPA lists corrupt practices: bribery, undue influence, appeal to religion or caste, booth capture, and expenditure beyond the prescribed limit.
  • An election petition under Sections 80–100 lies in the High Court; if the returned candidate is found guilty, the election can be declared void.
  • Separate from the petition, Section 8A lets the President disqualify a person found guilty of a corrupt practice, after the opinion of the Election Commission, for a period that the Commission recommends.
  • Section 8, by contrast, is the criminal-conviction route that Lily Thomas v. Union of India (2013) made immediate upon a two-year-plus sentence, which is why the corrupt-practice track looks even slower beside it.

Why the procedure needs simplification

  • An election petition can run past a large part of the five-year term; a member who sits while the case crawls enjoys the fruits of the very practice the Act condemns.
  • The High Court finding, the President’s order, and the Commission’s opinion are three clocks; stay orders and adjournments multiply them.
  • Voters, rival candidates, and the Commission cannot read a single timeline; complexity itself becomes a shield.
  • Model Code and expenditure cases often die as technical disputes rather than as clean findings of corrupt practice.

What simplification should look like

  • A statutory outer limit for election petitions, with day-to-day hearing as the Supreme Court has already urged in principle.
  • One disqualification consequence that follows a confirmed finding of corrupt practice, without a long second round unless a constitutional court stays it for recorded reasons.
  • Publish the Section 8A calendar so the President–Commission step is not an invisible file.
  • Recommendation: treat corrupt practice as seriously as the Lily Thomas conviction rule, or the RPA’s moral claim remains a paper threat.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  CP[s.123 corrupt practice] --> EP[High Court election petition]
  EP --> VO[Election void]
  EP --> EC[EC opinion s.8A]
  EC --> PR[President disqualifies]
  DL[Delay and stays] --> PR

Conclusion

The RPA already names corrupt practices and gives High Courts and the President tools to disqualify. The procedure is too fragmented and slow for those tools to bite inside one Lok Sabha term. Simplification — time-bound petitions and a single, visible disqualification follow-through — is needed if the Act is to protect the purity of elections rather than the sitting member.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2020 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks

    How far do you think cooperation, competition and confrontation have shaped the nature of federation in India? Cite some recent examples to validate your answer.

    View answer →

  2. 2020 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks

    The judicial systems in India and UK seem to be converging as well as diverging in the recent times. Highlight the key points of convergence and divergence between the two nations in terms of their judicial practices.

    View answer →

  3. 2020 · Q13 · GS II · 15 marks

    The strength sustenance of local institutions in India has shifted from their formative phase of 'Functions, Functionaries and Funs' to the contemporary stage of 'Functionality'. Highlight the critical challenges faced by local institutions in terms of their functionality in recent times.

    View answer →

  4. 2020 · Q14 · GS II · 15 marks

    Rajya Sabha has been transformed from a 'useless stepney tyre' to the most useful supporting organ in past few decades. Highlight the factors as well as the areas in which this transformation could be visible.

    View answer →

  5. 2019 · Q2 · GS II · 10 marks

    "The Central Administration Tribunal which was established for redressal of grievances and complaints by or against central government employees, nowadays is exercising its powers as an independent judicial authority." Explain.

    View answer →

  6. 2019 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks

    What are the methods used by the Farmers organizations to influence the policy- makers in India and how effective are these methods?

    View answer →

  7. 2019 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks

    Despite Consistent experience of High growth, India still goes with the lowest indicators of human development. Examine the issues that make balanced and inclusive development elusive.

    View answer →

  8. 2019 · Q8 · GS II · 10 marks

    Implementation of information and Communication Technology (ICT) based Projects / Programmes usually suffers in terms of certain vital factors. Identify these factors, and suggest measures for their effective implementation.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2020 · GS II · 10 marks

"Recent amendments to the Right to information Act will have profound impact on the autonomy and independence of the Information Commission". Discuss.

Indian Constitution

The 2005 Act gave CIC and ICs a five-year term and CEC-equivalent salary as a tenure-and-status guarantee. The RTI (Amendment) Act, 2019, left term and pay to Central Government rules and dropped the no-disadvantage clause. State Commissioners’ conditions also sit with the Centre, which federalises control over a State appellate. Appointment collegium was not the main target; security of tenure after appointment was. Autonomy suffers when the executive that is a frequent respondent also writes the Commissioner’s service rules.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2020 · GS II · 10 marks

How far do you think cooperation, competition and confrontation have shaped the nature of federation in India? Cite some recent examples to validate your answer.

Governance and Policy

Cooperation runs through the GST Council, All-India Services and disaster law. Competition appears in investment races and NITI-style indices after higher tax devolution. Confrontation shows in CBI consent withdrawals, GST compensation fights and 2020 farm-law resistance. Delhi’s LG–government dispute is executive confrontation inside a Union Territory with a legislature. Indian federalism is all three at once; no single word captures 2014–20 practice.

Q4 · UPSC Mains 2020 · GS II · 10 marks

The judicial systems in India and UK seem to be converging as well as diverging in the recent times. Highlight the key points of convergence and divergence between the two nations in terms of their judicial practices.

Governance and Policy

Both systems are common-law, precedent-based, and now fronted by a public Supreme Court. The UK’s 2009 Supreme Court and Human Rights Act moved it toward India’s rights-review look. India can strike down statutes and even test amendments against basic structure; the UK cannot. Appointments diverge: JAC in Britain, collegium in India after NJAC fell in 2015. PIL and a written Constitution keep Indian judicial practice more managerial of the executive.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.