Q4 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2020 · GS II · 10 marks · 2 min read

← Q3 Q13 →

The judicial systems in India and UK seem to be converging as well as diverging in the recent times. Highlight the key points of convergence and divergence between the two nations in terms of their judicial practices.

Topic: Governance and Policy. Syllabus: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2020 and Governance and Policy.

Revision summary

Both systems are common-law, precedent-based, and now fronted by a public Supreme Court. The UK’s 2009 Supreme Court and Human Rights Act moved it toward India’s rights-review look. India can strike down statutes and even test amendments against basic structure; the UK cannot. Appointments diverge: JAC in Britain, collegium in India after NJAC fell in 2015. PIL and a written Constitution keep Indian judicial practice more managerial of the executive.

Model answer

Introduction

India inherited the common-law court, the adversarial trial, and a professional Bar from Britain. In recent decades the two systems have moved closer on a Supreme Court as a public institution and on rights review, and further apart on who appoints judges and whether Parliament is supreme. Convergence and divergence are both real.

Body

Convergence

  • The UK Constitutional Reform Act, 2005, and the UK Supreme Court (2009) separated the highest appeal from the House of Lords, which looks more like India’s distinct Supreme Court under Articles 124–147.
  • An independent Judicial Appointments Commission in the UK and India’s declared commitment to judicial independence are the same family of concern, even if the machinery differs.
  • Human Rights Act, 1998, in the UK and India’s long Article 21 expansion both made rights a daily judicial practice, not only a political gift.
  • Both systems use common-law reasoning, precedent, and a strong culture of judicial review of executive action.
  • Open judgments, live streaming experiments, and a public-facing apex court are a shared twenty-first-century style.

Divergence

  • Parliamentary sovereignty remains the UK’s first principle: courts may issue a declaration of incompatibility under the HRA; they do not strike down a primary Act as India does under Articles 13 and 32.
  • India has a written Constitution, basic structure (Kesavananda Bharati, 1973), and PIL; the UK has no equivalent constituent document or social-action docket of the Bandhua Mukti / MC Mehta type.
  • Appointments: UK JAC and Lord Chancellor process versus India’s collegium after the Three Judges Cases and the striking down of NJAC in Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (2015).
  • India combines a Union Supreme Court with High Courts as constitutional courts; the UK’s devolution jurisdictions (Scotland, Northern Ireland) are a different map.
  • Contempt, court-pack size, and the political heat of the collegium have no full UK twin.

Key point

  • They converge as professional common-law apex courts that check the executive. They diverge because India is a constitutional state with judicial supremacy over amendments’ basic structure, while the UK remains a parliamentary state with a new but still bounded Supreme Court.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  CL[Common law Bar review] --> CV[Convergence]
  UK[UK SC 2009 HRA] --> CV
  IN[Art 13 PIL basic structure] --> DV[Divergence]
  AP[Collegium versus JAC] --> DV

Conclusion

Recent times pulled India and the UK together in having a visible Supreme Court and a rights-based review of government. They pulled apart on appointments, PIL, and the power to invalidate primary legislation. The shared common-law skin now covers two different constitutional bodies.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2020 · Q1 · GS II · 10 marks

    "There is a need for simplification of procedure for disqualification of persons found guilty of corrupt practices under the Representation of peoples Act" Comment.

    View answer →

  2. 2020 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks

    How far do you think cooperation, competition and confrontation have shaped the nature of federation in India? Cite some recent examples to validate your answer.

    View answer →

  3. 2020 · Q13 · GS II · 15 marks

    The strength sustenance of local institutions in India has shifted from their formative phase of 'Functions, Functionaries and Funs' to the contemporary stage of 'Functionality'. Highlight the critical challenges faced by local institutions in terms of their functionality in recent times.

    View answer →

  4. 2020 · Q14 · GS II · 15 marks

    Rajya Sabha has been transformed from a 'useless stepney tyre' to the most useful supporting organ in past few decades. Highlight the factors as well as the areas in which this transformation could be visible.

    View answer →

  5. 2019 · Q2 · GS II · 10 marks

    "The Central Administration Tribunal which was established for redressal of grievances and complaints by or against central government employees, nowadays is exercising its powers as an independent judicial authority." Explain.

    View answer →

  6. 2019 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks

    What are the methods used by the Farmers organizations to influence the policy- makers in India and how effective are these methods?

    View answer →

  7. 2019 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks

    Despite Consistent experience of High growth, India still goes with the lowest indicators of human development. Examine the issues that make balanced and inclusive development elusive.

    View answer →

  8. 2019 · Q8 · GS II · 10 marks

    Implementation of information and Communication Technology (ICT) based Projects / Programmes usually suffers in terms of certain vital factors. Identify these factors, and suggest measures for their effective implementation.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q18 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks

The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights has to address the challenges faced by children in the digital era. Examine the existing policies and suggest measures the Commission can initiate to tackle the issue.

Governance and Policy

Harms: grooming, bullying, addictive design, data profiling, deepfakes, influencer labour, and exclusion without devices. Law: POCSO, IT rules, JJ Act, DPDP 2023 parental consent, NEP caution on ed-tech. NCPCR can inquire, recommend and move courts under the 2005 Act. Measures: age-assurance, school device rules with offline equity, POCSO e-evidence protocol, ed-tech data audits, 1098 integration, influencer-work codes, privacy-by-default for minors. The Commission should regulate design, not become a meme censor.

Q17 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks

"In contemporary development models, decision-making and problem-solving responsibilities are not located close to the source of information and execution defeating the objectives of development." Critically evaluate.

Governance and Policy

The quote names a split: knowledge at the bottom, decisions at the top, execution in between. CSS, SPVs and parallel bodies bypass 73rd/74th institutions that the Constitution empowered. 2nd ARC and Punchhi already diagnosed fragmentation of the local State. The critique fits toilets, housing and MGNREGA planning; it fits less for vaccines, tax and defence. Repair: subsidiarity, untied local finance, elected control of SPVs, shared MIS with the Gram Sabha.

Q15 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks

What are environmental pressure groups? Discuss their role in raising awareness, influencing policies and advocating for environmental protection in India.

Governance and Policy

Environmental pressure groups organise to change ecological decisions of State and firms. Awareness: Chipko, Silent Valley, CSE and climate networks. Policy: EPA, FRA, NGT, EIA contests, PESA and mining consent. Advocacy: Mehta cases, Godavarman, Niyamgiri, Narmada and later climate-rights litigation. Limits: urban bias versus FRA communities, science errors, FCRA chill; they are one constitutional voice, not the ministry.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.