Revision summary
Russia, China and other powers are already entrenched in Central Asia through security, pipelines and BRI. India’s land path is blocked, so it uses Connect Central Asia, SCO, INSTC and Chabahar. The Ashgabat Agreement is a multimodal transit pact; India acceded in 2018. Accession offers legal corridor access toward Central Asia via Iran, not an instant rival to BRI. Iran sanctions and missing rail-customs links are the tests that will decide if 2018 was a turning point or a paper.
Model answer
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CA[Central Asia] --> CH[China BRI SCO] CA --> RU[Russia CSTO] IN[India 2018 Ashgabat] --> IR[Iran Chabahar] IR --> TM[Turkmenistan Uzbekistan] TM --> CA IN --> NS[INSTC]
Conclusion
- Finish Chabahar operational links, harmonise customs with INSTC, and run scheduled Indian cargo so the Agreement is a timetable, not a communiqué.
- Use SCO and bilateral energy talks with Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan to fill the corridor with actual freight.
- Keep a sanctions-aware Iran policy so the 2018 accession does not become a stranded legal asset.
Outside powers are already dug into Central Asia; India’s interest is connectivity and energy without a Pakistani land gate. Joining the Ashgabat Agreement in 2018 gives India a transit-law foothold that can join Chabahar and INSTC. The implication is opportunity plus homework: the paper corridor will matter only if ships, rails and Iran policy keep moving.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Indian and USA are two large democracies. Examine the basic tenets on which the two political systems are based. (15).
Next question on this syllabus topic (2018 · Q13). View answer →
-
Does joining Ashgabat give India a land route through Pakistan?
The Agreement is about agreed transit among members, not about opening the India–Pakistan political border. India’s practical path remains sea-plus-Iran.
-
Is Ashgabat a military alliance against China?
No. It is a transport pact. The strategic implication is a thinner alternative corridor, not a CSTO- or NATO-style bloc.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks
"Policy contradictions among various competing sectors and stakeholders have resulted in inadequate 'protection and prevention of degradation to environment." Comment with relevant illustrations. -
2018 · Q9 · GS II · 10 marks
"India's relations with Israel have, of late, acquired a depth and diversity, which cannot be rolled back." Discuss. (10 ). -
2018 · Q13 · GS II · 15 marks
Indian and USA are two large democracies. Examine the basic tenets on which the two political systems are based. (15). -
2018 · Q14 · GS II · 15 marks
How is the Finance Commission of India constituted? What do you know about the terms of reference of the recently constituted Finance Commission? Discuss. (15). -
2018 · Q15 · GS II · 15 marks
Assess the importance of the Panchayat system in India as a part of local government. Apart from government grants, what sources the Panchayats can look out for financing developmental projects? (15). -
2018 · Q20 · GS II · 15 marks
In what ways would the ongoing US-Iran Nuclear Pact Controversy affect the national interest of India? How should India respond to its situation? (15). -
2017 · Q1 · GS II · 10 marks
"The local self government system in India has not proved to be effective instrument of governance". Critically examine the statement and give your views to improve the situation. -
2017 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks
How do pressure groups influence Indian political process? Do you agree with this view that informal pressure groups have emerged as powerful than formal pressure groups in recent years?
More from this topic
Q18 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights has to address the challenges faced by children in the digital era. Examine the existing policies and suggest measures the Commission can initiate to tackle the issue.
Governance and Policy
Harms: grooming, bullying, addictive design, data profiling, deepfakes, influencer labour, and exclusion without devices. Law: POCSO, IT rules, JJ Act, DPDP 2023 parental consent, NEP caution on ed-tech. NCPCR can inquire, recommend and move courts under the 2005 Act. Measures: age-assurance, school device rules with offline equity, POCSO e-evidence protocol, ed-tech data audits, 1098 integration, influencer-work codes, privacy-by-default for minors. The Commission should regulate design, not become a meme censor.
Q17 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
"In contemporary development models, decision-making and problem-solving responsibilities are not located close to the source of information and execution defeating the objectives of development." Critically evaluate.
Governance and Policy
The quote names a split: knowledge at the bottom, decisions at the top, execution in between. CSS, SPVs and parallel bodies bypass 73rd/74th institutions that the Constitution empowered. 2nd ARC and Punchhi already diagnosed fragmentation of the local State. The critique fits toilets, housing and MGNREGA planning; it fits less for vaccines, tax and defence. Repair: subsidiarity, untied local finance, elected control of SPVs, shared MIS with the Gram Sabha.
Q15 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
What are environmental pressure groups? Discuss their role in raising awareness, influencing policies and advocating for environmental protection in India.
Governance and Policy
Environmental pressure groups organise to change ecological decisions of State and firms. Awareness: Chipko, Silent Valley, CSE and climate networks. Policy: EPA, FRA, NGT, EIA contests, PESA and mining consent. Advocacy: Mehta cases, Godavarman, Niyamgiri, Narmada and later climate-rights litigation. Limits: urban bias versus FRA communities, science errors, FCRA chill; they are one constitutional voice, not the ministry.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.