'The emergence of Self Help Groups(SHGs) in contemporary times points to the slow but steady withdrawal of the state from developmental activities'. Examine the role of the SHGs in developmental activities and the measures taken by the Government of India to promote the SHGs. (250 words).

Role of SHGs in developmental activities

• Thrift and credit: members save, lend internally, and then borrow from banks as a group. That role cuts the moneylender and builds a credit history for women who had no collateral.
• Livelihoods: groups run micro-enterprises, farm aggregation, livestock, and non-farm work. Under the National Rural Livelihoods Mission they are meant to be the organisational unit of poverty reduction, not a hobby circle.
• Human development: SHGs have been used for immunisation, sanitation, nutrition (including links with anganwadis), and school attendance, which is social development through peer pressure and local knowledge.
• Governance: federations of SHGs sit in gram sabha processes, monitor wages under MGNREGA, and sometimes bid for local contracts. That is voice, which is a developmental outcome.
• Disaster and inclusion: groups have channelled relief, bank accounts, and insurance to members faster than a distant block office. They fail when capture by local elites or one caste occurs, or when credit becomes over-indebtedness without a market.

Does emergence mean State withdrawal?

• The slogan of withdrawal mixes two stories. One is liberalisation: the State stepped back from some production and subsidy channels. The other is a new public-management story: the State delivers through groups, banks, and missions instead of only through departments.
• Bank linkage, refinance, interest subvention, and NRLM salaries are State money and State design. An SHG that exists because a mission paid a community resource person is not evidence of exit; it is evidence of a changed instrument.
• Where the State has truly thinned — understaffed health centres, weak agricultural extension — SHGs cannot replace doctors or irrigation. Treating groups as a full developmental State is a category error.
• The better examination is complementary: SHGs socialise credit and women’s agency; the State still owes infrastructure, law, and counter-cyclical welfare (food, work, health).
• If “withdrawal” means less licence-raj production, the statement has a grain of truth. If it means the State may stop funding poverty work because SHGs exist, the statement is false and dangerous.

Measures taken by the Government of India

• NABARD’s SHG–Bank Linkage Programme (from 1992) is the parent financial measure: groups, then savings, then bank credit without traditional collateral.
• Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana and then NRLM (2011), later DAY-NRLM, made SHGs and their federations the core of rural livelihood policy, with community professionals, revolving funds, and interest subvention.
• Rashtriya Mahila Kosh, and earlier RMK-type micro-credit, plus SIDBI and MUDRA channels, widened non-farm credit around the SHG and related micro units.
• Priority-sector tagging of SHG loans, Business Correspondents, and Jan Dhan accounts made the bankable last mile possible.
• Women-centred missions (National Rural Health Mission community processes, Swachh Bharat local mobilisation, and State Kudumbashree-type models supported in national learning) used SHGs as implementation partners.
• Legal and regulatory easing for mutually aided cooperatives and for bank agents helped federations operate, though a full SHG law is not the main Union instrument; mission guidelines are.

Examine, then judge the quote

• SHGs are a developmental actor in credit, livelihoods and social norms.
• Their emergence is largely a State-promoted strategy. That is reconfiguration of the State, not a quiet goodbye.