Revision summary
NCW is a statutory Commission under the 1990 Act, not a constitutional court. It can investigate, recommend, inspect custodial places, and support important litigation. Public-sphere tools (POSH, police, local-body reservation) do the heavy tackling; NCW watches. Private-sphere harm needs the Domestic Violence Act, economic rights and local officers, which NCW cannot command. It can strategise in both spheres; it cannot adequately tackle either without the executive.
Model answer
Introduction
The National Commission for Women is a statutory body under the National Commission for Women Act, 1990. It can inquire, advise, litigate in a limited way, and run awareness. Public-sphere harms are workplaces, streets, police stations and political office. Private-sphere harms are the household, personal law, and unpaid care. The Commission can strategise on both; it cannot, by itself, tackle either with the power of a court or a ministry.
Body
What the Commission can do
- Section 10 of the 1990 Act lets it investigate deprivation of women’s rights, inspect jails and remand homes, fund litigation of a typical importance, and recommend on law and policy.
- It can summon, call for documents, and receive complaints of violence, dowry, workplace harassment, and denial of property or maintenance, which is a national letterbox for both spheres.
- It has used public hearings, research, and draft Bills (for example on trafficking, sexual harassment before the 2013 Act, and parts of criminal law) to set an agenda the government may pick up.
- As a specialised body it can coordinate with State Commissions for Women, the police, and the National Legal Services Authority, which is strategy by network, not by command.
Public sphere: partial reach
- Street violence, trafficking, political under-representation, and workplace harassment are public problems. The Commission can shame, recommend POSH compliance, and ask for more women in the force and in tickets.
- It cannot prosecute, cannot pass a budget, and cannot post a Superintendent of Police. Those remain with the criminal system and the executive.
- After Vishaka (1997) and the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013, the legal tools in the public workplace are stronger than the Commission’s own teeth; NCW is a watchdog, not the Internal Committee.
- Reservation in local bodies (Articles 243D and 243T) did more for public political presence than any NCW circular. The Commission can support that presence; it did not create it.
Private sphere: structural limits
- The family is where most unpaid labour, domestic violence, and personal-law inequality sit. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and criminal provisions are the tackling instruments; NCW is a referral and monitoring voice.
- Personal law and the household are politically sensitive. A recommendatory Commission will hesitate, or will be ignored, when reform touches marriage, divorce, guardianship, or the marital home.
- Privacy of the home, social stigma, and economic dependence mean many women never reach a Commission office. Strategy that does not include local protection officers, shelters, and independent income will fail the private sphere.
- NCW has no all-India field army. State Commissions are uneven. A Delhi-centred body cannot casework every private harm.
Reasons for a balanced answer
- Able to strategise: yes, because statute, visibility, and a complaint mandate let it name problems in both spheres and push model laws.
- Able to tackle: only in a weak sense — inquiry, recommendation, and occasional court intervention. Tackling needs police, prosecutors, labour inspectors, and fiscal rights (land, wages, pensions).
- The body is not constitutional, unlike the National Commission for Scheduled Castes. Governments can starve it of members, money, and independence, which is why performance swings with political will.
- A honest answer is therefore “strategise, yes; tackle, not adequately, unless the executive and courts carry the load.”
Flow diagram
flowchart TD N[NCW Act 1990] --> S[Inquire advise recommend] S --> U[Public sphere work street politics] S --> V[Private sphere family personal law] U --> L[Needs police labour law] V --> D[Needs DV Act shelters property rights]
Conclusion
The National Commission for Women can strategise on public and private harms through inquiry, draft law, and complaint handling under the 1990 Act. It cannot tackle those harms by itself because it lacks prosecution power, field staff, and control of personal-law or budget reform. It is a necessary watchdog; it is not a substitute for a gender-just State.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
'The emergence of Self Help Groups(SHGs) in contemporary times points to the slow but steady withdrawal of the state from developmental activities'. Examine the role of the SHGs in developmental activities and the measures taken by the Government of India to promote the SHGs. (250 words).
Next question in the 2017 paper (Q16). View answer →
-
Can NCW punish a harasser or a violent spouse?
No. It can inquire, recommend, and sometimes go to court. Punishment needs the criminal or POSH or domestic-violence process.
-
Why does the private sphere resist NCW strategy?
Because the household is guarded by personal law, stigma, and economic dependence. A recommendatory Delhi body cannot enter every home; local law and income can.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2017 · Q1 · GS II · 10 marks
"The local self government system in India has not proved to be effective instrument of governance". Critically examine the statement and give your views to improve the situation. -
2017 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks
How do pressure groups influence Indian political process? Do you agree with this view that informal pressure groups have emerged as powerful than formal pressure groups in recent years? -
2017 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks
'To ensure effective implementation of policies addressing water, sanitation and hygiene needs, the identification of beneficiary segments is to be synchronized with the anticipated outcomes' Examine the statement in the context of the WASH scheme. -
2017 · Q7 · GS II · 10 marks
Does the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 ensure effective mechanism for empowerment and inclusion of the intended beneficiaries in the society? Discuss. -
2017 · Q16 · GS II · 15 marks
'The emergence of Self Help Groups(SHGs) in contemporary times points to the slow but steady withdrawal of the state from developmental activities'. Examine the role of the SHGs in developmental activities and the measures taken by the Government of India to promote the SHGs. (250 words). -
2016 · Q3 · GS II · 12 marks
"The Indian party system is passing through a phase of transition which looks to be full of contradictions and paradoxes." Discuss. -
2016 · Q5 · GS II · 12 marks
Discuss each adjective attached to the word 'Republic' in the 'Preamble'. Are they defendable in the present circumstances? -
2016 · Q8 · GS II · 12 marks
What is quasi judicial body? Explain with the help of concrete examples.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2017 · GS II · 10 marks
"The local self government system in India has not proved to be effective instrument of governance". Critically examine the statement and give your views to improve the situation.
Governance and Policy
The 73rd and 74th Amendments created a third tier with elections, reservations and two Schedules of functions. Articles 243G and 243W still leave funds, functions and functionaries to State law, so devolution is uneven. Parastatals, late State Finance Commissions and administrator rule keep real governance above the ward. PESA, Finance Commission grants and a few State activity maps show what works when power is actually transferred. Improvement needs exclusive functions, notified SFC awards, and elected control of the staff who deliver services.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2017 · GS II · 10 marks
Critically examine the Supreme Court's judgement on 'National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014' with reference to appointment of judges of higher judiciary in India.
Executive and Judiciary
The Second and Third Judges Cases made the collegium the method of appointing Supreme Court and High Court judges. The 99th Amendment and the NJAC Act, 2014, tried to share that power with the Law Minister and two eminent persons. SCAORA (2015) struck both down as damaging basic-structure judicial primacy, with Justice Chelameswar dissenting. The Court asked for a better Memorandum of Procedure; that transparency work is still unfinished. Independence of appointment was protected; openness of appointment was not delivered by the judgment alone.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2017 · GS II · 10 marks
'Simultaneous election to the Lok Sabha and the State Assemblies will limit the amount of time and money spent in electioneering but it will reduce the government's accountability to the people' Discuss.
Parliament and State Legislatures
A common poll calendar would reduce Election Commission cost, party spend and Model Code freezes. Articles 83 and 172 set five-year terms that can end earlier; forcing one date can cut or stretch those bargains. Off-year Assembly verdicts are a real accountability tool that simultaneity would weaken. National waves may swamp State issues and federal diversity of mandates. Clustered cycles and an honest dissolution rule are safer than a rigid one-nation lockstep.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.