Revision summary
Ethno-nationalism is the political claim of an ethnic people to a state or autonomy. Geertz (primordial attachment), Barth (boundary) and Brass (elites) are the core lens. Resurgence follows weakened class ideology, census-media numbers, resource conflicts and indigenous world talk. Indian cases include Naga, Mizo, Bodo, Gorkha, Jharkhand, linguistic nativism and majoritarian fusion with religion. It can defend language and land; it can also create inner minorities.
Model answer
Introduction
Ethno-nationalism is the claim that a people defined by ethnicity — language, tribe, religion as descent, or a named history — ought to have a state, or a state-like autonomy. Anthropology treats it as a modern way of organising identity, not as a return to a tribal essence. Its resurgence is the return of that claim after a period when class, secular party or developmental nationalism seemed to dominate.
Body
The lens
Clifford Geertz (Old Societies and New States) described primordial attachments — blood, language, sacredness — that new states inherit. Fredrik Barth showed that ethnicity is a boundary maintained by contact, not a museum culture. Paul Brass and instrumentalists stress elites who convert culture into votes. Walker Connor called the nation a felt kinship. Indian material needs all three: feeling, boundary, and organisation.
Ethno-nationalism differs from civic nationalism (Constitution as membership) and from religious fundamentalism (scripture as law), though they can fuse (majoritarian Hindu rashtra talk; Khalistan; some Islamist nationalisms). Tribal ethno-nationalism asks for a Jharkhand, a Nagalim, a Bodoland, or a Sixth Schedule, often without exiting India.
Why resurgence
After 1989, socialist class language weakened globally; census, television and later social media made ethnic numbers visible. In India, Mandal, Mandir, and the reorganisation of states (2000, 2014) taught that identity pays. Insurgency and peace accords in the North-East institutionalised ethnicity as a negotiating unit. Global indigenous discourse (UNDRIP, even without ILO 169 in India) gave ST movements a world vocabulary of peoples.
Economic liberalisation produced winners in some linguistic states and losers in tribal resource belts; mining and dams (Narmada, Niyamgiri, Jharkhand coal) ethnicised development conflict. Diasporas fund homeland parties. COVID-19 and migration revived “outsider” talk in cities and in Assam.
Indian illustrations
Naga nationalism is the longest; accords try to fit it inside the Union. Mizo ethno-nationalism became a state. Bodo and Gorkha movements seek councils or states. Jharkhand fused tribe and region. Tamil, Telangana and Shiv Sena nativism show that ethno-nationalism is not only tribal. Khalistan and Kashmiri nationalisms (distinct histories) show the hard edge. Majoritarian Hindu nationalism is ethno-religious: it uses a civilisational majority rather than a small people, which is why Ghurye’s unity and Ambedkar’s warning both remain relevant.
Resurgence does not mean every tribe wants a nation. Many want PESA, FRA and dignity inside the republic. Anthropology’s task is to see when a cultural boundary becomes a sovereignty claim, and when the state answers with autonomy rather than only force.
Risks
Ethno-nationalism can protect a language. It can also minoritise an inner other (Muslims in a Hindu nation-talk; non-Bodos in BTR; Bru in Mizoram). Barth’s boundary is always two-sided. A secular, liberal, democratic state (the next question’s contrast) must allow cultural politics without letting blood define citizenship.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD E[Ethnic boundary] --> N[Ethno-national claim] N --> A[Autonomy or secession] M[Media numbers resources] --> N I[Inner minority] --> R[Risk of exclusion]
Conclusion
Ethno-nationalism is ethnicity organised as a claim to political sovereignty or autonomy. It has resurged because numbers, media, resource conflict and weak class language make peoplehood pay. In India it ranges from Sixth Schedule demands to majoritarian nation-talk. The anthropological question is who is enclosed as the people, and who is left outside the boundary.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Describe the important Paleolithic sites from South India with suitable examples. What is the significance of South Indian Paleolithic cultures?
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Is every regional party ethno-nationalist?
No. Many bargain inside the Constitution for a larger share. Ethno-nationalism begins when the ethnic we is treated as the rightful owner of the territory.
-
Is tribal self-rule secession?
PESA and Sixth Schedule are autonomy inside the Union. Secession denies the Constitution. Movements may slide from one to the other; the words are not the same.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Digitisation of rural economy -
2024 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Origin of State Societies -
2024 · Q1(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Syro-Malabar Christians -
2024 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Artisan tribes of Jharkhand -
2024 · Q1(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Causes of stunting and wasting among tribal children. -
2024 · Q2(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
How is PESA Act empowering local self-governance and impacting women's political participation? -
2024 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically describe evidences from Rakhi Garhi and its linkages to Harappan civilization. -
2024 · Q5(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
B.K. Roy Burman's concept of 'Buffer Zone'
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Digitisation of rural economy
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Digitisation of the rural economy means electronic payments, identity, credit, markets and welfare records in the village. Jan Dhan, Aadhaar, UPI, e-NAM and computerised land records are the main instruments. Village power now includes control of phones, OTPs and Common Service Centres. Women, elderly people and many tribal hamlets remain excluded where biometrics and language fail. Without PESA and secure titles, digital records can lock in older dispossession.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Origin of State Societies
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
State societies have central offices, territory and surplus extraction beyond kinship. Service and Fried staged the move from tribe and chiefdom to state; Childe linked it to urban surplus. Carneiro stressed warfare and circumscription; hydraulic theories over-fit India. Rakhigarhi and other Harappan cities show urban organisation; Magadha shows a clearer early state. Hill and forest polities in India often remained chiefly or acephalous until colonial mapping.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Syro-Malabar Christians
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Syro-Malabar Christians are Kerala’s East Syriac Catholic community, in communion with Rome. Origin memory is the Thomas tradition; the rite was Latinised after Diamper and later restored. They are socially distinct from Malankara, Orthodox, Latin and Protestant Christians. Endogamy, land and literacy produced a caste-like rank inside Kerala Christianity. They are an Indian social system using a West-Asian liturgical language, not a foreign enclave.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.