Revision summary
Wolf already placed local peoples inside world markets. Globalization intensifies land commodification, wage labour, and branded culture. Niyamgiri and dam displacement are Indian cases of resource enclosure. Remittances and tourism can feed and hollow the same household. New brokers create internal inequality. Friction, law, and cooperatives are the counter-moves, not a return to a closed isolate.
Model answer
Introduction
Indigenous economies were already inside colonial markets, as Eric Wolf showed. Globalization intensifies that enclosure through price, land, media, and law, and it does not have one single effect.
Body
What is hit
- Subsistence mixes of hunting, shifting cultivation, pastoralism, and craft meet cash crops, wage labour, and packaged food, which Marshall Sahlins’s domestic mode of production no longer describes as a closed circuit.
- Land and forest become commodities through mines, dams, plantations, and conservation fences, so tenure is the first economic fact, not only income.
Typical impacts
- Dispossession: Dongria Kondh resistance at Niyamgiri, Narmada displacement ethnography, and Amazon oil frontiers show that global demand for bauxite, electricity, and crude rewrites local livelihood.
- Labour and cash: Gulf and city migration from highland and island communities sends remittances that both feed households and empty fields, a pattern Arjun Appadurai would read as ethnoscapes of labour.
- Commoditised culture: tourism, fair-trade coffee, and patented seed can raise cash while stripping ritual control of knowledge, as in many Andean and north-east Indian craft markets.
- New inequality: brokers, contractors, and educated youth capture rents; elders and women who held common resources often lose.
- Health and food: market starch and alcohol replace diverse forest diets, which nutritional anthropology records as a biological cost of the same economic shift.
Not only loss
- Indigenous firms, cooperatives, and legal victories such as community forest rights can use global courts and NGOs, which Anna Tsing would call friction rather than a steamroller.
- Some pastoralists and fishers specialise for urban markets and stay on the land under new terms.
How to write the impact
- Name the local system first: jhum, herd, reef, or forest.
- Then name the global chain: metal, tourist, carbon, or garment.
- Then say who captures the cash.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD G[Global markets] --> L[Land mines dams] G --> W[Wages remittances] I[Indigenous economy] --> L I --> W L --> U[Unequal outcomes]
Conclusion
Globalization pulls indigenous economies into longer commodity chains and weaker tenure. The impact is dispossession and cash together, and the anthropological task is to show which households gain and which commons fail.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Describe the practical applications of DNA technology in the current scenario.
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Does globalization always destroy indigenous economy?
It often encloses land and replaces subsistence. Some groups capture niches in tourism, craft, or law. The outcome is empirical and unequal.
-
Were these economies untouched before the 1990s?
No. Colonial tax, missions, and indenture already linked them. Globalization is intensification, not first contact.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q7(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss political and methodological aspects of national character studies. Elucidate the contemporary relevance of such studies. -
2022 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Debate between formalist and substantivist approaches -
2016 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the principles governing production, distribution and exchange in simple societies. -
2015 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Horticulture.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Scope and relevance of Social and Cultural Anthropology
Social-cultural Anthropology.
Social and cultural anthropology studies learned life in the round, from Tylor’s culture to Boas’s fieldwork. Malinowski and Radcliffe-Brown added living systems and social structure. The scope is kinship, economy, politics, religion, and change. Relevance lies in development, health, law, and comparison, as Srinivas and Elwin showed in India. Geertz keeps public meaning inside that same scope.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Cultural impact of Iron Age.
Iron Age
Iron opened heavier soils and denser farming after bronze. Childe linked that productive change to urban and political growth. In India, PGW and NBPW with iron mark the Ganga plains, and Hallur and megaliths mark the south. Craft, coin, war, and kingship are the cultural effects. The Iron Age is a social transformation, not only a metal phase.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Race and Ethnicity.
Race and racism, biological basis of morphological variation of non-metric and metric characters. Racial criteria, racial traits in relation to heredity and…
Race as a few fixed stocks fails Boas’s plasticity evidence and Lewontin’s genetic apportionment. Race still organises inequality as a social category. Ethnicity is a maintained boundary of language, history, and politics, as Barth argued. Cohen showed ethnicity at work in urban competition. In India the same people may be sorted by caste, tribe, or language depending on the boundary in play.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.