Revision summary
Horticulture uses hand tools and fallow, not the plough as the main engine. Swidden and mixed gardens are typical. Trobriand yam gardens show kinship claiming produce. Boserup tied intensification to population pressure. It is a skilled ecology, not a failed agriculture.
Model answer
Introduction
Horticulture is small-plot plant cultivation with hand tools, often with fallow. It sits between foraging and plough agriculture.
Body
Features
- Digging stick, hoe, and axe matter more than the plough and draught animal.
- Swidden or slash-and-burn, as in Northeastern India and Melanesia, uses ash, then long fallow.
- Gardens mix tubers, banana, and pulses. Surplus is modest. Land is often lineage-held, as Malinowski showed in Trobriand yam gardens.
Contrast
- Esther Boserup treated intensification as a response to population, not a one-way ladder.
- Sahlins placed horticulturalists in a domestic mode of production, with kinship claiming the harvest.
- It is not ‘primitive farming’. It is a skilled ecology of soil rest and plot rotation.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD H[Horticulture] --> T[Hoe stick fallow] H --> K[Kin tenure] H --> S[Swidden jhum]
Conclusion
Horticulture is hoe-and-fallow cultivation inside kin tenure. Trobriand yams and Naga jhum are type cases, not failed ploughing.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Is horticulture the same as gardening for leisure?
No. It is a subsistence system. The English word is a technical label for hoe cultivation.
-
Does it always destroy forest?
Long fallow can hold forest. Short fallow under land pressure is the risk.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the impact of globalization on the economic systems of indigenous communities. -
2023 · Q7(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss political and methodological aspects of national character studies. Elucidate the contemporary relevance of such studies. -
2022 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Debate between formalist and substantivist approaches -
2016 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the principles governing production, distribution and exchange in simple societies.
More from this topic
Q7(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss political and methodological aspects of national character studies. Elucidate the contemporary relevance of such studies.
Economic Organization
National character work grew from culture-and-personality, especially Benedict on Japan. It was politically funded as wartime culture-at-a-distance. Methods were life history, projective tests, film, and émigré interview. Faults are stereotyping, sample bias, and the ecological fallacy. Geertz moved the field from private character to public meaning. Today the genre survives in branding and populism; anthropology uses it as a caution.
Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the impact of globalization on the economic systems of indigenous communities.
Economic Organization
Wolf already placed local peoples inside world markets. Globalization intensifies land commodification, wage labour, and branded culture. Niyamgiri and dam displacement are Indian cases of resource enclosure. Remittances and tourism can feed and hollow the same household. New brokers create internal inequality. Friction, law, and cooperatives are the counter-moves, not a return to a closed isolate.
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Debate between formalist and substantivist approaches
Economic Organization
Formalists treat scarcity and choice as universal. Substantivists, after Polanyi, treat reciprocity, redistribution, and market as historical forms. Kula and Nuer cattle show goods locked in kinship and prestige. Spheres of exchange refuse one money. Use both tools: calculation inside an instituted process.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.