Revision summary
SDG 2015 became a frame for Indian poverty policy rather than a single new statute. PM-KISAN, Ayushman Bharat, Jal Jeevan and PMAY are major post-2015 launches. NFSA, MGNREGA and NRLM pre-date 2015 but were continued and digitised in the SDG era. POSHAN, PMGKAY and Ujjwala sit in the same toolkit. The package is broad; landless and informal workers still fall through title-based and insurance-based designs.
Model answer
Introduction
The UN Sustainable Development Goals (2015), especially SDG 1 (no poverty) and related goals on food, health, water and work, became a frame for Indian welfare. Some schemes were new after 2015; others were older rights continued and digitally recast. A brief sociological catalogue should keep that distinction.
Body
Post-2015 launches and recasts
PM-KISAN (2019) pays an income support to landholder farmer families—poverty alleviation as a cash transfer, skewed toward those with title. Ayushman Bharat (2018)—PM-JAY insurance plus health and wellness centres—attacks medical impoverishment (SDG 3). Jal Jeevan Mission (2019) targets household tap water (SDG 6). PMAY (Gramin 2016, Urban 2015) is housing as asset and dignity (SDG 11). National Nutrition Mission / POSHAN (2018) and the continued NFSA, 2013 (implemented through the SDG years with One Nation One Ration portability) address hunger. NRLM / DAY-NRLM (pre-2015 architecture, expanded with SHGs and lakhpati didi targets) is women’s livelihood poverty work (SDG 5 and 1). MGNREGA (2005) continued as a rural employment floor through the SDG period, including a COVID spike in demand.
- Other aligned instruments: e-SHRAM, PMGKAY food extra during COVID, Ujjwala, Saubhagya, and Direct Benefit Transfer plumbing. Together they form a welfare architecture mapped onto SDGs, not a single anti-poverty law.
- Limits belong in a brief note: landless labour gains less from PM-KISAN; insurance is not a health system; MGNREGA wages and delays remain political. PMAY can become a pucca house without a livelihood. Jal Jeevan can deliver a tap and still fail on quality. The schemes still matter as the state’s post-2015 poverty toolkit, especially when read as SDG 1 plus 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 11 rather than as rival ministries.
Sociologically they also recast the poor as Aadhaar-verified beneficiaries, which is inclusion and surveillance together. That is the post-2015 signature as much as any new acronym.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD SDG[SDGs 2015] --> CASH[PM-KISAN DBT] SDG --> HEALTH[Ayushman] SDG --> H2O[Jal Jeevan] SDG --> HOUS[PMAY] OLD[NFSA MGNREGA NRLM] --> SDG
Conclusion
After 2015 India combined new transfers (PM-KISAN, Ayushman, Jal Jeevan, PMAY) with continued rights (NFSA, MGNREGA, NRLM). That is the government’s SDG-era poverty package: wide, digital, and still uneven for the landless informal poor.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Did MGNREGA start after the SDGs?
No. It is a 2005 Act. After 2015 it continued as the main rural employment guarantee, which India reports against SDG 1 and 8.
-
Is NFSA a post-2015 scheme?
The Act is 2013. Its nationwide implementation, portability and COVID top-ups fall in the SDG years.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the major problems faced by the labour migrants while working in informal sectors of Indian States? Discuss. -
2024 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Is there a connection between labour migration and informal sector? Justify your answer with reference to Indian context. -
2024 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the changing nature of political elites in India. -
2023 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Critique the victory narratives of Green Revolution in the context of Indian society -
2023 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What is 'reverse migration' ? Discuss its features, causes and consequences in India -
2022 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What role do co-operatives plays in poverty alleviation in rural India ? -
2022 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine whether rural bondage still continues to be a social reality. Give your argument . -
2021 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the factors responsible for the rural unrest in contemporary India
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
'Textual perspective is important in understanding of Indian Social System.' Discuss.
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
The textual perspective explains Indian society through Dharmashastra, epics and related canons. Ghurye and Dumont used that archive to theorise caste as a hierarchical whole. The approach is strong on civilisational categories and weak on labour, gender and local power. Srinivas’s field view and Desai’s Marxism correct the book without discarding it. Texts remain part of the social system because groups still quote them in law and ritual.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Justify that the Indian traditions are modernizing. Also discuss its contributing factors.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Yogendra Singh treats modernization of Indian tradition as internal and external change together. Sanskritization, westernization and the Rudolphs’ modernity of tradition describe recasting, not simple death. Law, education, media, the developmental state and the post-1991 market are the main levers. Caste, household and religion persist in new organisational forms. Unevenness remains: mobility in class can coexist with control in marriage.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
According to you, which social reform movement has played the most effective role in uplifting the status of women? Explain.
Social Movements in Modern India
The most effective women’s social reform is the Phule–Ambedkar anti-caste line, not only bhadralok campaigns. It tied girls’ education, a critique of endogamy, and constitutional legal personhood. Sati abolition and widow remarriage opened the public question but had a narrower class-caste base. Hindu Code, later feminist litigation and Shah Bano debates inherit that citizenship frame. Patriarchy continues; effectiveness means a changed legal and educational grammar, not a finished utopia.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.