Revision summary
Most Indian labour migrants enter informal work, not a formal citadel. Contractors, advances and caste-kin networks organise the move. Construction, garments, domestic work and platforms illustrate the link. COVID return walks showed the city does not socially incorporate this labour. Informality and migration reproduce each other.
Model answer
Introduction
Yes, there is a tight connection. Most internal migrants in India do not enter a formal factory with a provident fund. They enter construction, workshops, domestic service, vending, kilns and now platforms—the informal sector. Migration supplies flexible labour; informality is how that labour is used without social security.
Body
How the link works
Jan Breman’s circular migrants move between village and work site without becoming a stable urban proletariat. Labour contractors recruit by kin and caste, pay advances, and keep people outside the regular roll. That is the same dualism Holmström described inside industry. The informal sector is not a traditional leftover; it is how Indian capitalism uses migrant flexibility.
Construction in Mumbai, Delhi and Gulf-oriented Kerala streams; garments in Tiruppur and NCR; domestic work in every metro; and seasonal agriculture in Punjab all rest on this link. The COVID-19 lockdown made the connection visible when informal migrants walked home because the city had no claim on them.
Justification in the Indian context
If migration went mainly into organised public-sector jobs, informality would be a side issue. The employment structure is the opposite. Even registered firms subcontract. e-SHRAM and One Nation One Ration are attempts to follow the migrant inside informality, which admits the link. Caste and region organise niches: eastern India to western construction, Adivasi streams to brick kilns.
The connection is two-way. Informal demand pulls migrants. Migrant oversupply keeps work informal by weakening unions. Village land, however small, subsidises urban cheap labour—A. R. Desai’s political economy still holds.
- So the justification is structural: India’s informal sector is a migrant labour regime, not a separate traditional economy.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD V[Village labour surplus] --> MIG[Circular migration] MIG --> INF[Informal construction services] CON[Contractors] --> INF INF --> CHEAP[Flexible cheap labour]
Conclusion
Labour migration and the informal sector are connected because migrants are recruited into unsecured work through contractors, and because firms stay informal by using that circulating labour. Indian cities and harvests run on that link.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Are slums the manifestations of industrialisation and urbanisation in India? Explain.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Do all informal workers migrate?
No. Local own-account workers are many. The dynamic growth sectors of urban informality lean heavily on migrants.
-
Is the gig economy a break from this link?
It is a digital version of informal wage work, often using the same migrant and young-urban labour pool.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the major problems faced by the labour migrants while working in informal sectors of Indian States? Discuss. -
2025 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the Indian government's schemes launched for poverty alleviation after the United Nation's Declaration of 'Sustainable Development Goals - 2015' ? Briefly describe -
2024 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the changing nature of political elites in India. -
2023 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Critique the victory narratives of Green Revolution in the context of Indian society -
2023 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What is 'reverse migration' ? Discuss its features, causes and consequences in India -
2022 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What role do co-operatives plays in poverty alleviation in rural India ? -
2022 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine whether rural bondage still continues to be a social reality. Give your argument . -
2021 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the factors responsible for the rural unrest in contemporary India
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What, according to you, are the factors responsible for the continuance of caste system in India? Explain.
Caste System
Caste continues as organisation and ideology, not only as village custom. Ambedkar’s endogamy, Dumont’s hierarchy, and Ghurye’s features still describe marriage, food and stigma. Srinivas showed mobility inside caste; Béteille and Desai linked it to land, class and power. The Constitution and reservations recast caste as a political identity rather than simply erasing it. Markets and cities loosened occupation more than they loosened kinship.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the changes taking place in the industrial class structure in India.
Social Classes in India
The older industrial class was a minority organised mill and PSU workforce. Mills declined; contract labour, circular migration and job work expanded. Services and IT added a salariat above a large informal industrial and logistics workforce. Caste and gender still sort who enters secure versus hazardous work. Unions lost the mill colony world and have only partly regrouped.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Is patriarchy a key to understanding different forms of inequalities in Indian society? Elaborate.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Patriarchy is a structure of control over labour, sexuality and status, not only prejudice. Uma Chakravarti’s Brahmanical patriarchy links caste honour to the regulation of women. Ambedkar’s endogamy thesis makes gender central to caste reproduction. Class inequalities run through unpaid care and segmented female work. The state both reforms and reproduces gender through personal law and welfare.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.