Revision summary
High-yield wheat and rice plus procurement did raise output in irrigated north-west India. Victory narratives treat that as a national social success. Class and caste capture, mechanisation of labour, and regional bias contradict that story. Groundwater and chemical costs are part of the same package. A sociological critique keeps the grain and drops the miracle.
Model answer
Introduction
Victory narratives say the Green Revolution ended food shortage through high-yield seed, fertiliser, irrigation, and procurement. Sociologically the same package also ranked regions, castes, and ecologies. A critique does not deny grain. It denies that grain was a social victory for all.
Body
What the victory story gets right
- Wheat and rice yields rose in Punjab, Haryana, and parts of western Uttar Pradesh from the late 1960s, and public procurement built a buffer.
- Famine as a national calendar risk receded for several decades.
Social critique
- Gains followed irrigation and owned land, so dominant-caste rich peasants captured machines, credit, and support prices, which Desai’s class lens predicted.
- Landless labourers sometimes gained days of work and then lost them to mechanisation; real wages did not automatically become just.
- Rainfed eastern and central India were labelled ‘backward’ against a Punjabi model, which is regional inequality, not national victory.
- Beteille’s overlap of caste and land explains why a ‘farmer’ in official talk was often a particular jati.
Ecological and later political costs
- Groundwater collapse, pesticide harm, and crop diversity loss sit inside the same package.
- Debt and distress in some Green Revolution belts later contradicted the forever-victory story.
- Victory talk also hid women and migrant labour as the unseen workforce of the miracle.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD HY[HYV irrigation credit] --> Y[Yield and buffers] HY --> D[Dominant caste capture] HY --> E[Water chemicals monocrop] D --> CR[Critique of victory] E --> CR
Conclusion
The Green Revolution was a production success for selected crops and regions. As a social narrative of national victory it erases class capture, regional bias, labour, and ecology.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Citing some case studies, expand the concept of Development-induced Displacement?
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Does critique mean India should not have raised yields?
No. It means yield is not the same as just agrarian structure or sustainable ecology.
-
Was the Green Revolution only Punjab?
The classic wave was north-west wheat-rice. Later pockets elsewhere copied parts of the package with mixed results.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Is there a connection between labour migration and informal sector? Justify your answer with reference to Indian context. -
2024 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the changing nature of political elites in India. -
2023 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What is 'reverse migration' ? Discuss its features, causes and consequences in India -
2022 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What role do co-operatives plays in poverty alleviation in rural India ? -
2022 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine whether rural bondage still continues to be a social reality. Give your argument . -
2021 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the factors responsible for the rural unrest in contemporary India -
2021 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What are the sociological reasons and implication of "reverse migration" during the recent pandemic in India ? -
2021 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the role of co-operatives in rural development
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Highlight the significant features of A.R. Desai's 'Dialectical Perspective' to study Indian Society
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai studies Indian society as historical materialism, not as a harmonious village. Caste and custom are read as ideology over agrarian class. The colonial and planning state are part of the contradiction, not neutral umpires. Village studies of consensus are criticised as incomplete. The method is strong on land, labour, and struggle.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"The decade of 1950s was the golden period of village studies in Indian Sociology." Explain the statement
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
The 1950s joined planning, Community Development, and intensive village ethnography. Srinivas, Dube, Marriott, Bailey, Mayer and others built the classic monographs. Dominant caste, factions, and the field view came from this decade. The village was treated as a keyhole to Indian society. Beteille and class analysis later limited that claim.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Analyse the differences between the attributional and interactional approach in studying the caste system
Caste System
Attributional caste scores groups by listed traits such as diet, occupation and ritual. Ghurye and colonial lists exemplify that approach. Interactional caste ranks groups by who gives and receives food, service and honour. Marriott, Dumont and Srinivas made interaction the test of hierarchy. Lived rank can diverge from textbook attributes.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.