Revision summary
Law and vote made hierarchy publicly illegitimate even as practice continued. Sanskritization now competes with Dalit and OBC identity. Village service grids loosened; occupations and parties recast caste. A small reserved middle class appeared. Endogamy and land still structure everyday caste.
Model answer
Introduction
Since Independence, caste has changed in culture and in structure, without disappearing. Culture shifted from an openly sacred hierarchy toward identity, shame, and rights talk. Structure shifted from a village service grid toward politics, education, and labour markets, while endogamy and atrocity still hold.
Body
Cultural change
- Untouchability is legally an offence and publicly stigmatised, a disharmonic value shift in Beteille’s sense.
- Sanskritization continues, but reservation and Ambedkarite pride offer other languages than copying twice-born style.
- Cinema, campus, and urban anonymity weaken everyday pollution talk, yet honour and marriage ads keep it alive.
Structural change
- Land reform, Green Revolution, and dominant-caste politics recast who commands the village surplus.
- Adult franchise and caste associations turned jati into vote blocs.
- Occupations opened in towns, so hereditary service is no longer the only map, though Dalit labour still clusters in dirty and casual work.
- Protective discrimination created a small Dalit and OBC middle class, and a creamy-layer debate.
What did not change enough
- Endogamy remains the spine.
- Rural land and urban rental markets still carry caste.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD IND[Independence law vote] --> CU[Culture rights shame identity] IND --> ST[Structure politics class mobility] EN[Endogamy atrocity] --> P[Persistence]
Conclusion
Culturally, caste is less a proud sacred ladder and more a contested identity. Structurally, it is less a closed village occupational order and more a political-economic resource. Both changes are real; neither is completion.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Indebtedness is one of the serious issues leading to farmers suicides Discuss reasons and suggest solutions
Next question in the 2017 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Is caste now only political?
Politics is louder. Marriage, labour, and violence show structure beyond the booth.
-
Did Sanskritization stop?
No. It shares the field with assertion that refuses imitation.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give a critical analysis of Andre Beteille's study of Tanjore village. -
2018 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Has caste system hindered democracy and adult franchise in India. Discuss. -
2017 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How have the struggles against untouchability changed their forms and perspective from Gandhian to Ambedkarite positions? -
2016 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
How has B.R. Ambedkar identified the features of caste system ? How is it different from the mainstream treatment of caste features ? -
2016 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss Andre Beteille account of the relationship between caste, class and power as a change from symmetrical to asymmetrical one. -
2015 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system -
2015 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Is caste system changing, weakening or disintegrating in India? -
2015 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How far Srinivas Sanskritization is modernizing force or traditionalizing force in understanding the changes in caste system?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a critique of the structural and functional perspective used by M.N. Srinivas in the understanding of Indian society
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Srinivas studied India as an observed village structure, not a book of sacred rules. Function explained how custom held groups together. Desai’s class reading and Beteille’s disharmony expose the harmony bias. The village monograph cannot stand for mill, city, and tribe. Keep the field tools; refuse the closed-system claim.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Hierarchy still ranks bodies through honour, endogamy, and atrocity. Difference organises caste as political identity and rights. Srinivas’s dominant caste already split ritual rank from local power. Beteille’s disharmony names equality as value beside ranked practice. Public life leans to difference; intimacy still leans to hierarchy.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the distinct features of islam as practised in India, and how have they changed over time ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Indian Islam is regional, often shrine-centred, and internally ranked. Minority status after Partition made community a political fact. Reform and print pushed scriptural uniformity against custom. Caste-like divisions and dargah practice persist. Change is toward a firmer boundary, not toward one identical piety.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.