Revision summary
Srinivas studied India as an observed village structure, not a book of sacred rules. Function explained how custom held groups together. Desai’s class reading and Beteille’s disharmony expose the harmony bias. The village monograph cannot stand for mill, city, and tribe. Keep the field tools; refuse the closed-system claim.
Model answer
Introduction
M. N. Srinivas’s structural-functional view mapped Indian society as a living village system of caste, kinship, and faction. The critique is not that the field view was useless. It is that harmony language, village closure, and a weak class eye limited what the method could see.
Body
What the perspective did
- Structure was the observed network of groups and statuses, not a varna chart. Function was what a custom did for order, as in Rampura festivals that tied patrons and clients.
- Dominant caste and Sanskritization put mobility inside the system, so change did not have to mean collapse.
- The method corrected G. S. Ghurye’s book view with interaction.
Limits of function and harmony
- A. R. Desai argued that landlord, tenant, and labourer are class relations. Treating them as functions of village solidarity hides surplus extraction.
- Andre Beteille’s Sripuram kept structure but named disharmony: equality as a public value beside ranked caste and class.
- Sanskritization explains ritual climbing. It does not explain annihilation of caste as Ambedkar demanded.
Village as the whole
- Rampura is a powerful case, not India. Town, mill, plantation, and tribe sit outside that frame.
- Women and Dalit labour were often under-seen when the informant was a headman.
Use after critique
- Keep field method, dominant caste, and Sanskritization as tools.
- Add class, gender, and extra-village power.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD SF[Srinivas structure function] --> RP[Rampura field view] RP --> DC[Dominant caste Sanskritization] CL[Desai class] --> CR[Critique] BT[Beteille disharmony] --> CR CR --> SF
Conclusion
Srinivas’s structural functionalism is strongest as a field correction to Indology. It is weakest when Indian society is reduced to a self-balancing village. Critique means adding class, disharmony, and the Constitution, not throwing Rampura away.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ?
Next question in the 2017 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Does critique mean Srinivas ignored conflict?
He saw faction and mobility. He still framed them as adjustments of a structure, not as class war.
-
Is the method only functionalist?
It is structural-functional in the Radcliffe-Brown line, rewritten with Indian tools of dominant caste and Sanskritization.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2017 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ? -
2017 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the distinct features of islam as practised in India, and how have they changed over time ? -
2017 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Indebtedness is one of the serious issues leading to farmers suicides Discuss reasons and suggest solutions -
2017 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the concepts of dominant caste' and ' vote ' bank giving examples from specific regions -
2017 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give an account of the problems relating to the "creamy layer". -
2017 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss some of the striking issues of development induced imbalances that need urgent attention -
2017 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the causes and solutions for the low female sex-ratio in the DEMARU States of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal, and Gujarat ? -
2017 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
To what extent does nation building depends on strengthening of pluralities in Indian society?
More from this paper
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Which is more significant, the principle of 'hierarchy' or the principal of difference; in inter caste relations in the present day ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Hierarchy still ranks bodies through honour, endogamy, and atrocity. Difference organises caste as political identity and rights. Srinivas’s dominant caste already split ritual rank from local power. Beteille’s disharmony names equality as value beside ranked practice. Public life leans to difference; intimacy still leans to hierarchy.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the distinct features of islam as practised in India, and how have they changed over time ?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Indian Islam is regional, often shrine-centred, and internally ranked. Minority status after Partition made community a political fact. Reform and print pushed scriptural uniformity against custom. Caste-like divisions and dargah practice persist. Change is toward a firmer boundary, not toward one identical piety.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How have the struggles against untouchability changed their forms and perspective from Gandhian to Ambedkarite positions?
Caste System
Gandhi treated untouchability as a moral sin to be cured by service and temple entry. He kept a reformed village and varna ideal. Ambedkar treated it as caste structure needing annihilation, rights, and exit options. Forms moved from satyagraha to parties, conversion, and the Constitution. Contemporary Dalit politics is largely Ambedkarite in perspective.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.