Q4(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q1(e) Q4(b) →

Compare the pressing problems of a dalit poor family living in an urban slum with a similar type of family living in a rural setting

Topic: Rural and Agrarian transformation in India. Syllabus: Rural and Agrarian transformation in India: Programmes of rural development, Community Development Programme, cooperatives, poverty alleviation schemes; Green revolution and social change; Changing modes of production in Indian agriculture; Problems of rural labour, bondage, migration. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2017 and Rural and Agrarian transformation in India.

Revision summary

Rural Dalit poverty is organised by landlessness, dominant caste, and open untouchability. Urban slum poverty is organised by informal dirty work and weak housing tenure. The city eases some ritual exclusion and adds eviction and rent. Class exploitation is shared; caste assigns the worst tasks in both places. Marriage and honour still follow the family across the rural–urban move.

Model answer

Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.

Introduction

A poor Dalit family faces graded inequality in both village and slum. The village problem is land, bonded work, and open honour. The slum problem is rent, informal wage, and a quieter but still spatial caste. Comparison shows different cages, not a free city.

Body

Rural setting

  • Landlessness and dominant-caste farms organise labour, as Srinivas’s Rampura still suggests for local power.
  • Untouchability at well, temple, and school can be public. Atrocity is a rural weapon.
  • Housing may be a segregated hamlet; the state is the sarpanch and the police station.

Urban slum

  • Work is construction, sanitation, leather, rag-picking, or domestic service: caste occupation recoded as informal labour.
  • Tenure is illegal or weak; eviction and lack of water and toilets hit women hardest.
  • Anonymity can ease some pollution rules, yet landlords, neighbours, and marriage still ask jati.
  • Ambedkar saw the city as an exit. The slum is a partial exit: wages without dignity of housing.

Shared pressing problems

  • Credit, health costs, children’s school dropout, and violence against women.
  • A. R. Desai’s class eye: both are surplus labour. Caste decides the dirtiest tasks.

Contrast

  • Rural: honour and land. Urban: rent and the municipal state.
  • Neither family has escaped endogamy as the family’s future.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  R[Rural Dalit poor] --> L[Landless honour atrocity]
  U[Urban slum Dalit poor] --> I[Informal wage eviction]
  CST[Caste labour] --> R
  CST[CST] --> U[U]

Conclusion

The rural Dalit poor family is trapped by agrarian dominance and open untouchability. The slum family is trapped by informal work and insecure shelter. City life thins some ritual insults and thickens market precarity. Both need land or tenure, and both need annihilation of caste in everyday institutions.

Quick related

Students also ask

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2026 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Compare G. S. Ghurye's and A. R. Desai's approaches used in understanding Indian society

    View answer →

  2. 2017 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Compare the north Indian kinship System with the South Indian kinship system

    View answer →

  3. 2015 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Broadly compare the kinship system of North and South India.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks · Solution

Synchronise the developmental programmes and social change in India, and describe them through visible and lived experiences

Rural and Agrarian transformation in India

• State-led developmental plans in India act as tools for social engineering to break traditional inequalities. • Land reforms altered agrarian structures, but uneven implementation created varied local realities. • The 1952 Community Development Programme aimed for rural uplift but often strengthened dominant caste power. • The Green Revolution drove agricultural modernization while widening regional and class gaps. • The 73rd Amendment transformed grassroots politics by empowering women and marginalized castes through reservations. • MGNREGA and welfare schemes improved rural bargaining power, reduced distress migration, and redefined state-citizen ties. • True progress requires pairing economic growth with substantive social equality to overcome persistent structural exclusions.

Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution

What are the Indian government's schemes launched for poverty alleviation after the United Nation's Declaration of 'Sustainable Development Goals - 2015' ? Briefly describe

Rural and Agrarian transformation in India

SDG 2015 became a frame for Indian poverty policy rather than a single new statute. PM-KISAN, Ayushman Bharat, Jal Jeevan and PMAY are major post-2015 launches. NFSA, MGNREGA and NRLM pre-date 2015 but were continued and digitised in the SDG era. POSHAN, PMGKAY and Ujjwala sit in the same toolkit. The package is broad; landless and informal workers still fall through title-based and insurance-based designs.

Q5(d) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution

What are the major problems faced by the labour migrants while working in informal sectors of Indian States? Discuss.

Rural and Agrarian transformation in India

Interstate migrants in informal work are hired through contractors, not stable contracts. Wage theft, unsafe housing, and missing social security are the core problems. Women and children carry extra risks of harassment and lost schooling. COVID reverse migration exposed their civic invisibility. Portability laws and e-SHRAM are incomplete answers to a structural informality.

PDF