Revision summary
Gandhi’s anti-untouchability work created moral trust among many Harijans. Ambedkar rejected Gandhi’s varna frame and Congress tutelage. The Poona Pact is the hinge of political mistrust. Temple entry without structural power did not satisfy Dalit radicals. Trust was partial, moral more than constitutional.
Model answer
Introduction
Gandhi won wide Harijan sympathy as a moral campaigner against untouchability. He did not win full political trust from Ambedkarite Dalits, who wanted rights, separate electorates, and annihilation of caste, not only temple entry.
Body
Where trust existed
- Village constructive work, the Harijan tour, and the fast against separate electorates made Gandhi a protector in many Congress and bhakti milieus.
- He called untouchability a sin. That language moved caste Hindus more than legalism alone.
Where trust broke
- Ambedkar’s What Congress and Gandhi Have Done to the Untouchables charged that Gandhi kept caste as varna duty and blocked independent Dalit power.
- The Poona Pact replaced reserved electorates with reserved seats under a joint vote, which Ambedkar later treated as a loss of autonomy.
- Temple entry without property, army, and law looked to Dalit radicals like a change of heart, not of structure.
Sociological close
- Beteille’s disharmony fits: Gandhi preached equality of souls inside a ranked society. Trust followed that split.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD G[Gandhi Harijan work] --> T[Moral trust] A[Ambedkar] --> R[Rights separate power] PP[Poona Pact] --> G PP --> R
Conclusion
Untouchables trusted Gandhi as a saint against the practice of untouchability. Many did not trust him as the architect of their political freedom. Ambedkar remains the measure of that gap.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Feminization of poverty.
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Did all Dalits reject Gandhi?
No. Many Congress Dalits and village devotees trusted him. The organised Ambedkarite stream did not.
-
Was the disagreement only about electorates?
Electorates were the flash. The deeper fight was varna versus annihilation of caste.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2015 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals -
2015 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical -
2015 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Feminization of poverty. -
2015 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss Marxist approach to the analysis of Indian nationalism. -
2015 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the basic tenets of Hindu religion? Is Hinduism based on monotheism or polytheism? -
2015 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Why is it necessary to implement PCPNDT Act in India? -
2015 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Main objective of Tribal sub plan (TSP) -
2015 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss B.R. Ambedkar as a wise democrat.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Elwin defined tribal freedom as protection of land, language, and self-rule. He rejected Ghurye’s assimilation of tribe into Hindu society. Isolation was a shield, not a museum, until contact was fair. Nehruvian Panchsheel borrowed this caution. Law now tries to keep that freedom as rights inside the state.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Phule linked caste domination to the robbery of the peasant. Gulamgiri and the cultivator’s whip made tillers the centre of critique. Satyashodhak schools attacked the knowledge monopoly that kept the field unfree. He is closer to anti-caste agrarian politics than to mild temple reform. Class language came later; the landlord-priest pair was already his target.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system
Caste System
Dumont treats caste as a hierarchical ideology of purity and impurity. Power and wealth are real but encompassed by ritual rank. Homo hierarchicus contrasts with Western equality as a value. Sripuram and Rampura show class and dominant caste that the ideology does not fix. The perspective is necessary for values, insufficient for land and politics.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.