Revision summary
Patriarchy is organised male authority in kin, property and public life. Dube’s Seed and Earth explains why daughters are not full heirs in practice. Patrilocal marriage and endogamy limit women’s claims. Law grants rights that households may still deny. Wages and office create partial counter-entitlements.
Model answer
Introduction
Patriarchy is a social system in which men as a category command authority, property, and the legitimate line. In the Indian family it directly shapes what women may claim as entitlement.
Body
Definition
- Patriarchy is not only a cruel father. It is organised male right in kinship, work, and the state.
- Leela Dube’s Seed and Earth names a Hindu North Indian form: man as seed of the line, woman as field to be guarded.
- It intersects caste and class: a landless Dalit woman and a dominant-caste daughter face different walls, both patriarchal.
Bearings on entitlement
- Descent and residence: patriliny and patrilocal marriage send the daughter out, so the natal house treats her as a guest in property.
- Inheritance: even after Hindu succession amendments, brothers often keep the field; title on paper is not tilling power.
- Sexuality and honour: control of marriage is control of the jati, which Ghurye listed as endogamy and which politics still polices.
- Care and unpaid work: entitlement to leisure, food, and medical spending is ranked; NFHS-type patterns of anaemia show household distribution, not only poverty.
- Law versus family: domestic violence and maintenance statutes exist in Beteille’s disharmonic order; panchayat and kin often restore the seed line.
Change
- Education, wages, and panchayat reservation create new claims.
- The family system still makes entitlement a negotiation against patriarchy, not a delivered right.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Patriarchy] --> S[Seed and Earth patriliny] S --> E[Weak property and honour control] L[Law wages office] --> C[Partial new entitlements]
Conclusion
Patriarchy is structured male command of line and resources. It has direct bearings on Indian women’s family entitlements in land, residence, honour, and care. Statutes puncture it; kinship often absorbs the puncture.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Compare the north Indian kinship System with the South Indian kinship system
Next question on this syllabus topic (2017 · Q3(c)). View answer →
-
Is matriliny free of patriarchy?
Property may follow women. Office and violence can still be male-dominated.
-
Does paid work end family patriarchy?
It strengthens bargaining. Honour and land can still overrule a wage.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain how land reforms brought about desired agrarian transformation. -
2022 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the challenges during village studies in India. -
2021 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Caste system studies in India have been dominated by the "book-view" initially, How did the entry of "field-view" bring about a balance in the study of Indian caste system? Discuss -
2019 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Examine the changing initiatives of the land tenure system in India -
2017 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Compare the north Indian kinship System with the South Indian kinship system -
2016 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Significance of Village Studies in Indian Sociology -
2016 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Analyse the major components of Land Reform Acts. Show their effectiveness in curbing rural inequality. -
2015 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Give some of the important studies relating to the structural changes in the Indian family system.
More from this topic
Q4(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Who is said to be the pioneer of village studies in India? Illustratively describe contributions of some Indian sociologists on village studies. How their approaches are distinct from each other?
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
Srinivas is the pioneer of intensive village fieldwork in Indian sociology, with Rampura and the dominant caste. Dube’s Shamirpet offered a holistic community study; Majumdar mixed survey and anthropology. Marriott and Dumont–Pocock insisted the village be read through civilisational and ideological categories. Béteille separated caste, class and power as no longer symmetrical. Marxist and political-anthropological village studies further shifted the master variable to surplus and faction.
Q3(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Do you think that new economic reforms of British rule have disrupted the old economic system of India? Substantiate your answer with suitable examples
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
The old economy combined peasant agriculture, artisan castes and layered trade, not a frozen idyll. Land settlements monetised revenue and strengthened landlord or state claims on the peasant. Nationalists argued deindustrialisation and drain; revisionists note regional survival and later mills. Socially, craft castes and towns lost patronage and many entered labour markets. Disruption is the right word: the old articulation of field and craft was broken even if not every loom stopped.
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
'Textual perspective is important in understanding of Indian Social System.' Discuss.
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
The textual perspective explains Indian society through Dharmashastra, epics and related canons. Ghurye and Dumont used that archive to theorise caste as a hierarchical whole. The approach is strong on civilisational categories and weak on labour, gender and local power. Srinivas’s field view and Desai’s Marxism correct the book without discarding it. Texts remain part of the social system because groups still quote them in law and ritual.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.