Revision summary
Karve’s regional contrast still holds as a broad map. The North emphasises gotra and village exogamy and hypergamy. The South more often permits cross-cousin marriage and closer natal links. Seed and Earth ideology is stronger as a north Indian default. Cities and Sanskritization mix the two without ending caste endogamy.
Model answer
Introduction
North and South Indian kinship differ most in marriage, descent talk, and the woman’s tie to her natal home. Irawati Karve’s regional map still organises the comparison, with many local exceptions.
Body
North
- Preferential village and gotra exogamy, with a wide bride-giving zone, produces hypergamy and a daughter who is sent out.
- Patriliny and virilocality are strong. Leela Dube’s Seed and Earth fits this belt especially well.
- The wife’s natal kin are often distant; purdah and honour codes thicken.
South
- Many Dravidian systems allow cross-cousin marriage, so the bride is already kin and the affinal gap is smaller.
- Karve noted closer natal ties and, in pockets, matriliny such as among Nayars historically, which is not the north Indian default.
- Hierarchy exists, but the north Indian kanyadan-plus-hypergamy machine is less universal.
Shared and changing
- Caste endogamy binds both. Srinivas’s Sanskritization can push southern groups toward northern honour styles.
- Law, migration, and dowry inflation mix the two maps in cities.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD N[North exogamy hypergamy] --> D[Daughter sent out] S[South cross-cousin] --> K[Bride already kin] E[Endogamy] --> N E --> S
Conclusion
North Indian kinship stresses exogamy, hypergamy, and a severed daughter. South Indian kinship more often recycles kin through cousin marriage and keeps natal ties warmer. Both remain caste kinships.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the paradigm of modernization of Indian tradition in analyzing social change in India.
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Is the South without patriarchy?
No. Many southern groups are patrilineal. The marriage circuit and natal claims differ.
-
Do all southern castes marry cousins?
No. It is a regional tendency with caste and class exceptions, not a single rule.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the conceptual issues about lineage and descent in India. Give suitable illustrations , -
2018 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Illustrate the importance of 'Kanyadaan' and 'Kulavadhu' in changing institution of marriage and family. -
2018 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Western patriarchy which surrenders feminine principles is the development project in India. Do you agree with this view? Why? -
2018 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Assess the impact of ban on 'Triple Talak' on marriage and divorce among the Muslim community in India. -
2017 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Clarify the distinction between "household" and "family" and evaluate Whether joint families have completely disintegrated -
2016 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Bring out the significance of the difference between family and household. -
2016 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Examine the impact of industrialization and urbanization on family structure. -
2015 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
What is patriarchy? How does it affect the child socialization pattern in India?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Verrier Elwin's views on freedom for the tribals
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Elwin defined tribal freedom as protection of land, language, and self-rule. He rejected Ghurye’s assimilation of tribe into Hindu society. Isolation was a shield, not a museum, until contact was fair. Nehruvian Panchsheel borrowed this caution. Law now tries to keep that freedom as rights inside the state.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jyotirao Phule as an agrarian radical
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Phule linked caste domination to the robbery of the peasant. Gulamgiri and the cultivator’s whip made tillers the centre of critique. Satyashodhak schools attacked the knowledge monopoly that kept the field unfree. He is closer to anti-caste agrarian politics than to mild temple reform. Class language came later; the landlord-priest pair was already his target.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Louis Dumont's perspective on Indian caste system
Caste System
Dumont treats caste as a hierarchical ideology of purity and impurity. Power and wealth are real but encompassed by ritual rank. Homo hierarchicus contrasts with Western equality as a value. Sripuram and Rampura show class and dominant caste that the ideology does not fix. The perspective is necessary for values, insufficient for land and politics.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.