Revision summary
Science and technology are major forces of social change and are also steered institutions. Marx, Weber, Ogburn and Merton offer different angles on this role. Online education can archive and extend lessons for connected students. It exposes a digital divide of devices, space and home support. Schooling is socialisation as well as content, which a screen only partly supplies. The sound opinion is public digital infrastructure plus the school, not replacement by platforms.
Model answer
Introduction
Science and technology change how societies produce, heal, fight, communicate and teach. They are among the strongest forces of modern social change. They are also social institutions, funded and steered by states, firms and professions. A critical examination must hold both sides. Online education is a current test of that double view.
Body
Roles in social change
- William Ogburn spoke of cultural lag: material technology moves first, and norms catch up later. Karl Marx treated the forces of production, including tools and knowledge, as a motor of change, always inside relations of property. Max Weber saw rationalisation and technical means as part of the disenchantment of the world. Science, as Robert Merton described it, has an ethos of organised scepticism, yet it also needs patronage. Green revolution seeds, vaccines, railways and mobile phones have remade Indian rural and urban life. They have also created new inequalities of skill, capital and risk, as in industrial disasters and in data extraction.
Technology does not determine a single path. The same digital network can support a public health campaign and a rumour mill. Langdon Winner and later STS scholars argue that artefacts can embody social choices. Social change through science is therefore real, powerful and politically directed.
Online education and teaching
Online education expanded sharply during COVID-19. It can reach a student who has a device and a signal, and it can archive lectures. SWAYAM and other Indian platforms show a public effort to widen access. That is a genuine gain for some working students and for remote coaching.
The same trend deepens the digital divide. ASER and other studies showed that many children lacked devices, quiet space or literate help at home. Teaching is not only content delivery. It is socialisation, peer group, discipline and the hidden curriculum that Bourdieu linked to cultural capital. A screen lesson can weaken those functions. Surveillance of students, commercial platforms and a market in recorded coaching can turn education into a commodity more than a public good. Teachers’ labour is also reorganised, sometimes without security.
My opinion is that online tools should remain a supplement and a public infrastructure, not a cheap replacement for the school as a social institution. Science and technology should widen equal access to knowledge. When they are left to private platforms and uneven households, they speed change for some and leave others further behind.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD ST[Science and technology] --> SC[Social change] ST --> IN[Inequality and power] ON[Online education] --> ACC[Access for some] ON --> DIV[Digital divide] ON --> SOC[Weaker school socialisation]
Conclusion
Science and technology drive social change as productive forces and as institutions of power. Online education can extend teaching, but it cannot replace the school’s social functions for most children. A critical view supports public digital access and keeps face-to-face education at the centre.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Underline the role of social media in contemporary social movements and describe its challenges
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Is opposition to online teaching anti-science?
No. A sociological opinion can support science and still say that teaching is a social relationship, not only a file transfer.
-
Can online education reduce inequality?
It can, if devices, language and public platforms are equalised. Without that, it often reproduces household advantage.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
To what extent can education and skill development be an agent of social change? Critically analyze. -
2024 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss various theories of social change. Explain the limitations of unilinear theory of social change -
2024 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically examine the World-Systems theory of Immanuel Wallerstein in terms of development and dependency of various nations -
2023 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the role of science and technology in addressing age-old taboos and superstitions -
2022 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment. -
2022 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Trace the trajectory of development perspectives on social change. -
2022 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Sociologists argue for democratization of science and technology for inclusive development. Comment. -
2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Are traditional social institutions getting weakend as agents of social change in the contemporary society ? Substantiate.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the nature of Sociology. Highlight its relationship with Social Anthropology.
Sociology
Sociology is the systematic study of social relationships, institutions and structures. Its nature is empirical, comparative and theoretical, after Comte, Durkheim, Marx and Weber. Social anthropology studies culture and community life, often through intensive fieldwork. The two subjects share the study of institutions and meaning. They differ in typical scale, method and historical setting. Indian village studies show how the border has been crossed in practice.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyse the changing nature of caste as a status group.
Sociology
Weber’s status group is a community of honour, lifestyle and closure. Caste fits this through hierarchy, endogamy and ritual ranking described by Ghurye, Dumont and Ambedkar. Sanskritisation and the dominant caste show older strategies of status mobility and local power. Law, reservations and democratic politics have recast caste as a public identity. Urban class and occupation have loosened hereditary work more than they have loosened marriage. Change is real, but caste has not ceased to be a status group.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Marriage as an institution has undergone a radical transformation from 'ritual' to 'commercial' in its outlook. Explain the factors behind this change.
Sociology
Older marriage was a ritual alliance of families, caste and honour. A commercial outlook prices grooms, dowry and wedding display. Hypergamy and scarce high-status jobs inflate the market. Media, urban consumption and the wedding industry make the ceremony a public show. Law against dowry exists, but practice still follows family bargaining. Ritual form can survive while the outlook becomes commercial.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.