Revision summary
Civil society: associations and publics between family and state. Gramsci, Tocqueville, and Habermas are the frame. Indian S&T engagement: people’s science, Bhopal, dams, GM, trials, RTI. Unequal scientific capital limits who sits on committees. Consultation is not yet co-decision.
Model answer
Introduction
- Civil society is associative life between family and state: unions, movements, professional bodies, and publics that argue. Antonio Gramsci placed hegemony there. In India it has also knocked on the laboratory door.
Body
Civil society
- Alexis de Tocqueville saw associations as schools of democracy. Jürgen Habermas pictured a public sphere of critical talk.
- It is not only NGOs. Uncivil groups also organise. The test is public argument, not a registration certificate.
Engagement with S&T policy
- People’s science movements, the Kerala Sasthra Sahithya Parishad, and later right-to-information work asked that expertise be accountable.
- Campaigns on Bhopal, big dams, GM crops, nuclear siting, and drug trials forced environmental and ethical review.
- Patient groups and disability networks entered medical technology debates. Farmers’ groups contested seed law.
Limits
- Donor-led NGOs can thin into project talk. The state may consult and still decide.
- Scientific capital, as Bourdieu would say, is unequally held. Informal labour rarely sits on expert committees.
Note
- Engagement is real in EIA hearings, PILs, and open-data fights. It is uneven in who speaks for “the people”.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CS[Civil society] --> PUB[Public argument] CS --> ST[S and T policy] ST --> CAM[Bhopal dams GM trials] LIM[Expert closure] --> ST
Conclusion
Civil society is organised public life outside office and kin. In Indian S&T policy it has forced accountability on disaster, dams, seeds, and trials. Gramsci and Habermas frame the hope. Capture and expert closure frame the limit.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Assess the role of mass media as an agent of social change
Next question on this syllabus topic (2017 · Q5(e)). View answer →
-
Is a think tank civil society?
It can be a public voice. It can also be a state or corporate satellite. Look at funding and audience.
-
Does protest anti-science?
Much Indian engagement demands better science and consent, not a return to mystery.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine the contribution of dependency theories in understanding the present global scenario. -
2021 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Describe the role of Science and Technology in enabling us to face the challenges triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. -
2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Is humanity at the mercy of Nature, Science and Technology ? Comment in the light of pandemic situation. -
2020 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Technology has accelerated the process of development and dependency. Discuss. -
2017 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Assess the role of mass media as an agent of social change -
2017 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Examine any two theories of social change in detail society -
2017 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Critically analyse the role of science and technology in bringing about social change -
2016 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Social conflict is both a cause and a consequence of social change." Explain.
More from this topic
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
To what extent can education and skill development be an agent of social change? Critically analyze.
Social Change in Modern Society
Durkheim and Parsons treat schooling as moral and role socialisation, a force of change. Human capital and capability approaches link skill to productivity and freedom. Bourdieu and correspondence theorists show reproduction of class through the school. Indian expansion of education has created new aspirations and some mobility. Coaching, English, caste and credential inflation limit the equalising effect. The extent is partial: necessary for change, insufficient as a sole agent.
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically examine the World-Systems theory of Immanuel Wallerstein in terms of development and dependency of various nations
Social Change in Modern Society
Wallerstein takes the capitalist world-economy, not the nation, as the unit of analysis. Core, semi-periphery and periphery are linked positions in one division of labour. Development of the core has been historically tied to peripheral constraint. The theory criticises Rostow-style national stages and is cousin to Frank’s underdevelopment thesis. Criticisms include thin treatment of internal class, culture and new industrial cores. It remains a strong map of dependency, provided ranks are not treated as eternal.
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss various theories of social change. Explain the limitations of unilinear theory of social change
Social Change in Modern Society
Social change is theorised as evolution, cycle, conflict, functional adaptation and global hierarchy. Unilinear evolution claims one sequence of stages for all societies. Comte, Morgan and some readings of Marx illustrate the ladder form. Limits include Eurocentrism, teleology and weak handling of collapse and mixture. Multilinear and dependency arguments were developed against that ladder. Differentiation can be kept as a theme without a compulsory staircase.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.