Q1(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q7(c) Q1(c) →

Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline

Topic: Sociology. Syllabus: Sociology — The Discipline: Modernity and social changes in Europe and emergence of sociology; Scope of the subject and comparison with other social sciences; Sociology and common sense. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2019 and Sociology.

Revision summary

Sociology emerged when industry, the state, and revolution made society a problem. Enlightenment comparison and Saint-Simon–Comte positivism supplied permission. Nisbet’s conservative themes of community and authority also fed the field. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber turned the name into a discipline. Census offices made method a public craft.

Model answer

Introduction

Sociology named itself in nineteenth-century Europe when industrial capitalism, the nation-state, and revolution made society a problem. The antecedents are older ideas plus those shocks. Auguste Comte gave the name; the questions were already on the table.

Body

Intellectual antecedents

  • Enlightenment reason treated institutions as human products open to criticism, as Montesquieu’s comparison of laws already showed.
  • Scottish moralists such as Adam Smith studied the division of labour and morals as regularities, not as church mystery.
  • Saint-Simon demanded a science of social reorganisation after the French Revolution. Comte turned that programme into a hierarchy of sciences.

Material and political shocks

  • The Industrial Revolution created factories, cities, and new classes that parish custom could not explain.
  • The French Revolution showed that political order can collapse and be remade. Conservative reaction, which Robert Nisbet stressed, made community and authority into problems.
  • Colonial encounters supplied comparison, even when Europe used that comparison to rank others.

From philosophy to a discipline

  • Karl Marx analysed class and the mode of production. Emile Durkheim fixed social facts. Max Weber studied social action and rationalisation.
  • Universities, statistical bureaux, and the census made a career and a method possible.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  EN[Enlightenment comparison] --> SOC[Sociology]
  IND[Industry and revolution] --> SOC
  COM[Comte name] --> SOC
  MDW[Marx Durkheim Weber] --> SOC

Conclusion

Sociology emerged from Enlightenment comparison, industrial and revolutionary crisis, and the later classic trio of Marx, Durkheim, and Weber. Comte named the science. The antecedents are both ideas and the factory-state world that made those ideas urgent.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'?

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2019 · Q1(c)). View answer →

  • Did sociology begin only with Comte?

    He named it. Comparison, political economy, and revolutionary crisis already posed the questions.

  • Was it only a European story?

    The first chairs were European. Colonial censuses and later Indian sociology reworked the same tools.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2019 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'?

    View answer →

  2. 2019 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Explain the probability sampling strategies with examples

    View answer →

  3. 2019 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    According to Mead, "We play a key role in our own socialization."

    View answer →

  4. 2019 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Bring out the significance of Ethnography in social research

    View answer →

  5. 2019 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    What is 'reserve army of labour' ? Present the position of feminist scholars on this

    View answer →

  6. 2019 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Discuss the importance of interpretative understanding of social phenomena and explain its limitations

    View answer →

  7. 2019 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Are all world religions patriarchal ? Substantiate your answer with examples

    View answer →

  8. 2019 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    What, according to Irawati Karve, are the Major difference between North Indian and South Indian Kinship system?

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations

Sociology

Traditional kinship canonically runs on descent, marriage alliance and binary gendered terms. Queer kinship organises care, parenthood and belonging beyond that monopoly. Weston’s chosen families and Schneider’s critique of blood as symbol are theoretical anchors. Indian hijra gharanas illustrate initiation-based relatedness outside the patriline. Law often still privileges conjugal heterosexual kinship, which is part of the challenge. The point is that kinship is done through practice, not only inherited as blood.

Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

What do you understand by sustainable development? Discuss the elements of sustainable development as proposed in the UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals Report-2015

Sociology

Brundtland defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising the future. The 2015 SDG agenda, reflected in UNDP reporting, treats that as a multi-goal programme. Five elements—people, planet, prosperity, peace, partnership—organise the set. Seventeen goals join poverty and inequality to climate, cities, work and institutions. Sociology stresses unequal needs, risk distribution and weak institutions. The agenda is a frame for development, not an automatic achievement.

Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

What is science? Do you think that the methods used in natural sciences can be applied to sociology? Give reasons for your answer

Sociology

Science means systematic, public, criticisable knowledge, not only lab hardware. Positivists apply observation, measurement and comparison to social regularities. Limits include meaning, ethics of experiment, values and the double hermeneutic. Kuhn and feminists complicate even the natural-science side of the contrast. The judged answer is qualified yes: use the tools, drop the closed-system fantasy. Sociology remains a science of an open, interpreted world.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.