Q1(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q1(a) Q1(e) →

What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'?

Topic: Sociology. Syllabus: Sociology — The Discipline: Modernity and social changes in Europe and emergence of sociology; Scope of the subject and comparison with other social sciences; Sociology and common sense. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2019 and Sociology.

Revision summary

Fetishism of commodities: social relations among producers appear as relations among things. Exchange-value hides labour time as price. The illusion is socially real, not a personal superstition. Lukács extended it as reification. Gig pay and piece-rates still carry the appearance.

Model answer

Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.

Introduction

In Capital, Karl Marx named commodity fetishism as the way products of labour appear as things with a life of their own. Social relations among producers take the form of relations among objects on the market. The mystery is in the form of the commodity, not in a primitive idol.

Body

The concept

  • A commodity has use-value and exchange-value. In exchange, labour time is expressed as a price.
  • Producers do not meet as co-workers. They meet through things. The social character of labour is hidden in the object.
  • Fetish here means a social illusion that is real in its effects: money and capital seem to grow by themselves.

What it is not

  • It is not only consumer advertising. Georg Lukács later extended it toward reification of the whole of life.
  • It is not a claim that use-values are imaginary. Bread still feeds. The fetish is the market form.

Sociological use

  • Informal piece-rates and gig apps still present a wage as a thing the platform “gives”, hiding the relation.
  • Census occupational tables count jobs; they do not by themselves show this appearance.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  LAB[Social labour] --> COM[Commodity form]
  COM --> APP[Things seem alive]
  APP --> HID[Class relation hidden]

Conclusion

Commodity fetishism is Marx’s name for social labour appearing as a relation among things. Price looks natural; class is displaced. Lukács and later labour studies keep the concept usable beyond the nineteenth-century factory.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Explain the probability sampling strategies with examples

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2019 · Q1(e)). View answer →

  • Is this about religion?

    Marx used a religious metaphor. The object is the market form of labour, not temple ritual.

  • Does a fair price end the fetish?

    A juster wage still leaves the commodity form. Ending the fetish would mean another organisation of production.

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2017 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    What is Weberian critique of Marxist notion of social stratification

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · Solution

Discuss the significance and limitations of 'intersectionality' in social research

Sociology

Intersectionality, coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw, examines how overlapping identities like race, class, and gender shape systemic oppression. Its significance in social research lies in capturing lived realities beyond single-axis frameworks and preventing reductive generalisations. However, limitations include methodological complexity, risks of infinite regress, and difficulties in operationalising fluid categories. Effective application requires balancing structural macro-analysis with micro-level lived experiences.

Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks · Solution

Discuss the intellectual origins of sociology and its evolution as a distinct field of study

Sociology

Sociology arose in 19th-century Western Europe to make sense of massive upheavals caused by the Industrial and French Revolutions. Enlightenment thinkers laid the groundwork by championing reason, empirical observation, and human agency over traditional dogma. Auguste Comte gave the discipline its name, pushing for a positivist "physics of society" based on scientific laws. Émile Durkheim secured its academic legitimacy by defining "social facts" and using empirical methods to study human behavior. Max Weber introduced interpretive sociology, while Karl Marx focused on material conditions and class struggle. In the 20th century, Talcott Parsons advanced structural-functionalism to study systemic equilibrium. Later, conflict theories, the Frankfurt School, and postmodern critiques broadened the field to address power and marginalisation. Today, sociology continues to evolve by analyzing globalisation, digital shifts, and modern identity politics.

PDF