Revision summary
Science means systematic, public, criticisable knowledge, not only lab hardware. Positivists apply observation, measurement and comparison to social regularities. Limits include meaning, ethics of experiment, values and the double hermeneutic. Kuhn and feminists complicate even the natural-science side of the contrast. The judged answer is qualified yes: use the tools, drop the closed-system fantasy. Sociology remains a science of an open, interpreted world.
Model answer
Introduction
Science is a public method of producing knowledge that is systematic, open to criticism, and in principle testable against the world. It is not a pile of laboratory instruments. The question is whether the methods that worked for physics and biology—controlled observation, measurement, comparison, law-seeking—can be applied to sociology. Auguste Comte and Emile Durkheim answered largely yes. Max Weber and later interpretive and critical traditions answered: only in part, and never as a copy of the natural-science laboratory.
Body
Why the methods can be applied
Society shows regularities. Birth, death, crime, voting and prices can be counted. Comparison across groups, as in Durkheim’s Suicide or in contemporary NFHS tables, is a cousin of Mill’s methods. Hypotheses, sampling, reliability and replication are not the property of chemistry. Karl Popper’s demand that claims be criticisable travels well. Without some natural-science discipline, sociology collapses into essayistic common sense. Demographic transition, network models and survey experiments in political sociology show that controlled reasoning is possible even when a full laboratory is not.
Why they cannot be copied wholesale
Human beings interpret the investigation, change their behaviour, and live inside values and power. The double hermeneutic, in Anthony Giddens’s phrase, has no analogue in the study of stones. Experiments on people raise ethics and artificiality; the classic laboratory of physics is rarely available. Meanings require Verstehen. Standpoint feminists and phenomenologists add that the knower is socially located. Thomas Kuhn reminded even natural science that paradigms are historical, so the contrast is not between a perfect physics and a failed sociology.
The reasoned conclusion is qualified applicability. Measurement, comparison, models and public criticism should be used wherever the object allows. Participant observation, historical interpretation and critique of categories are still scientific in a broad Weberian sense if they are systematic and honest. What cannot be applied is the fantasy of value-free prediction of a closed system. A village study that names its method and its limits is more scientific than a questionnaire that pretends to be physics. Sociology is a science of an open, meaningful world, not an inferior laboratory discipline.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD SCI[Science as public testable method] --> YES[Apply counts comparison hypotheses] SCI --> NO[Cannot copy closed laboratory] YES --> DUR[Durkheim surveys] NO --> WEB[Verstehen reflexivity] BOTH[Qualified science of society] --> YES BOTH --> NO
Conclusion
Natural-science methods of comparison, measurement and public testing can and should be used in sociology. They cannot be the whole method, because social objects interpret back and are value-laden. Science here means disciplined inquiry, not a borrowed laboratory coat.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What do you understand by sustainable development? Discuss the elements of sustainable development as proposed in the UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals Report-2015
Next question on this syllabus topic (2025 · Q8(a)). View answer →
-
If methods cannot be fully applied, is sociology not a science?
It is a science in the sense of systematic public inquiry. It is not physics, and need not be.
-
Are qualitative methods unscientific?
They are unscientific only if they are unaccountable. Systematic ethnography can be more valid than a bad questionnaire.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is common sense? How are common knowledge and sociology related to each other? Explain. -
2025 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically analyze the sociological significance of informal sector in the economy of developing societies -
2025 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In what way is the scope of sociology unique? Explain. -
2025 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think that the formal workspaces are free of gender bias? Argue your case. -
2025 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by sustainable development? Discuss the elements of sustainable development as proposed in the UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals Report-2015 -
2025 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations -
2024 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the nature of Sociology. Highlight its relationship with Social Anthropology. -
2024 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyse the changing nature of caste as a status group.
More from this topic
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations
Sociology
Traditional kinship canonically runs on descent, marriage alliance and binary gendered terms. Queer kinship organises care, parenthood and belonging beyond that monopoly. Weston’s chosen families and Schneider’s critique of blood as symbol are theoretical anchors. Indian hijra gharanas illustrate initiation-based relatedness outside the patriline. Law often still privileges conjugal heterosexual kinship, which is part of the challenge. The point is that kinship is done through practice, not only inherited as blood.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by sustainable development? Discuss the elements of sustainable development as proposed in the UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals Report-2015
Sociology
Brundtland defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising the future. The 2015 SDG agenda, reflected in UNDP reporting, treats that as a multi-goal programme. Five elements—people, planet, prosperity, peace, partnership—organise the set. Seventeen goals join poverty and inequality to climate, cities, work and institutions. Sociology stresses unequal needs, risk distribution and weak institutions. The agenda is a frame for development, not an automatic achievement.
Q5(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think that the formal workspaces are free of gender bias? Argue your case.
Sociology
Formal organisations claim impersonal merit; gendered sociology shows otherwise. Acker’s gendered job, Kanter’s tokens and Hochschild’s second shift are core arguments. Pay gaps, glass ceilings and care penalties persist inside contracts and appraisals. POSH law in India is evidence that formal offices were not automatically safe. Formalisation can reduce some arbitrary power but also bureaucratises male defaults. The argued case is that formal workspaces are not free of gender bias.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.