Revision summary
Brundtland defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising the future. The 2015 SDG agenda, reflected in UNDP reporting, treats that as a multi-goal programme. Five elements—people, planet, prosperity, peace, partnership—organise the set. Seventeen goals join poverty and inequality to climate, cities, work and institutions. Sociology stresses unequal needs, risk distribution and weak institutions. The agenda is a frame for development, not an automatic achievement.
Model answer
Introduction
Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without closing the chances of future generations. The Brundtland Commission popularised that formula in 1987. In 2015 the United Nations adopted the Sustainable Development Goals, and UNDP’s reporting around that agenda treated sustainability as a package of social, economic and environmental aims, not as a green afterthought to growth. Sociology is needed because “needs” are unequally defined and because institutions, not only technology, decide who bears environmental cost.
Body
From definition to the 2015 elements
The 2015 agenda is organised as seventeen goals with targets, from no poverty and zero hunger through health, education, gender equality, water, energy, decent work, industry, inequality, cities, consumption, climate, oceans, land, peace and justice, to partnership. UNDP and UN communications also grouped the agenda as five interlocking “P”s: people, planet, prosperity, peace and partnership. People names the social floor: poverty, hunger, health, education, gender. Planet names climate, ecosystems and resource limits. Prosperity names inclusive growth and decent work rather than GDP alone. Peace names institutions, rights and an end to violence as development conditions. Partnership names finance, data and global cooperation, including the famous idea of leaving no one behind.
Sociologically this is a shift from earlier modernisation theory, which trusted industrial take-off, and from a narrow environmentalism that ignored livelihoods. Amartya Sen’s capability concern sits in the background of human development reporting: sustainability without freedom is incomplete. Ulrich Beck’s risk society and later environmental sociology add that hazards are socially distributed: a heatwave or a flood is not class-blind.
Critical sociological reading
The elements can become a checklist that states report while extractive growth continues. Indicators may hide unpaid care and informal work. Goal 16 on institutions is easy to praise and hard to fund. Partnership can mean donor agendas. In India, tensions among coal livelihoods, air quality, forest rights and SDG localisation at panchayat level show that the elements collide. Still, as a public language, the 2015 set forces sociology of development to hold inequality, ecology and governance in one frame, which is its intellectual yield.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD SD[Sustainable development] --> PE[People] SD --> PL[Planet] SD --> PR[Prosperity] SD --> PA[Peace institutions] SD --> PN[Partnership] SD --> G17[Seventeen SDGs 2015]
Conclusion
Sustainable development means intergenerational justice in meeting needs. The 2015 UNDP-linked SDG agenda specifies that as people, planet, prosperity, peace and partnership, operationalised in seventeen goals. The sociological task is to see those elements as institutional and distributional, not as a poster of trees beside a factory.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations
Next question on this syllabus topic (2025 · Q8(c)). View answer →
-
Is sustainable development only about the environment?
No. The 2015 elements include poverty, gender, work, inequality and peace as well as climate and ecosystems.
-
Why mention UNDP specifically?
UNDP’s human development and SDG reporting treated the 2015 goals as an integrated development framework, which the question names.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is common sense? How are common knowledge and sociology related to each other? Explain. -
2025 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically analyze the sociological significance of informal sector in the economy of developing societies -
2025 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In what way is the scope of sociology unique? Explain. -
2025 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think that the formal workspaces are free of gender bias? Argue your case. -
2025 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is science? Do you think that the methods used in natural sciences can be applied to sociology? Give reasons for your answer -
2025 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations -
2024 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the nature of Sociology. Highlight its relationship with Social Anthropology. -
2024 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyse the changing nature of caste as a status group.
More from this topic
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations
Sociology
Traditional kinship canonically runs on descent, marriage alliance and binary gendered terms. Queer kinship organises care, parenthood and belonging beyond that monopoly. Weston’s chosen families and Schneider’s critique of blood as symbol are theoretical anchors. Indian hijra gharanas illustrate initiation-based relatedness outside the patriline. Law often still privileges conjugal heterosexual kinship, which is part of the challenge. The point is that kinship is done through practice, not only inherited as blood.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is science? Do you think that the methods used in natural sciences can be applied to sociology? Give reasons for your answer
Sociology
Science means systematic, public, criticisable knowledge, not only lab hardware. Positivists apply observation, measurement and comparison to social regularities. Limits include meaning, ethics of experiment, values and the double hermeneutic. Kuhn and feminists complicate even the natural-science side of the contrast. The judged answer is qualified yes: use the tools, drop the closed-system fantasy. Sociology remains a science of an open, interpreted world.
Q5(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think that the formal workspaces are free of gender bias? Argue your case.
Sociology
Formal organisations claim impersonal merit; gendered sociology shows otherwise. Acker’s gendered job, Kanter’s tokens and Hochschild’s second shift are core arguments. Pay gaps, glass ceilings and care penalties persist inside contracts and appraisals. POSH law in India is evidence that formal offices were not automatically safe. Formalisation can reduce some arbitrary power but also bureaucratises male defaults. The argued case is that formal workspaces are not free of gender bias.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.